Quantitative analysis of impact of human activities on soil erosion using the RUSLE model in a typical karst area in Guizhou, China

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13293-8
Xiong Gao, Zhongfa Zhou, Pingping Yang, Haoru Zhang, Changxin Yang, Shui Li
{"title":"Quantitative analysis of impact of human activities on soil erosion using the RUSLE model in a typical karst area in Guizhou, China","authors":"Xiong Gao,&nbsp;Zhongfa Zhou,&nbsp;Pingping Yang,&nbsp;Haoru Zhang,&nbsp;Changxin Yang,&nbsp;Shui Li","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13293-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human activities have significant influence on soil erosion in karst areas. The spatial and temporal evolution of soil erosion in Guizhou Province was evaluated using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), which revealed an increasing trend in the initial data analysis for the soil erosion modulus. To disclose the impact of human activities on regional soil erosion, the soil erosion in 2000, 2010, and 2020 was analyzed. The results show the following: (1) The average values of the soil erosion modulus in the study area for 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 4.479, 4.945, and 5.806 t·hm<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>, respectively; when considering human activities without the influence of rainfall erosivity, these values were 4.679, 4.963, and 4.799 t·hm<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>. The influence of human activities on soil erosion is gradually becoming a positive force. (2) According to the Spearman regression analysis, the top four factors related to soil erosion in 2000 and 2010 were soil loss risk (<i>E</i>, 0.721 and 0.737), anti-erosion factors (<i>Pr</i>, − 0.236 and − 0.221), rock exposure rate (0.222 and 0.279), and altitude (0.210 and 0.195). In 2020, the top four factors were <i>Pr</i> (0.725), land surface temperature (LST, 0.268), NDVI (− 0.232), and <i>E</i> (0.186). In the first two stages, soil erosion is closely related to natural factors, while in 2020, soil erosion is more closely related to human activities. (3) The geographically weighted regression (GWR) showed the highest range of regression coefficients for <i>Pr</i> (150), followed by <i>E</i> and NDVI (25), rock exposure rate (10), and land surface temperature (LST) (1.5). The rainfall erosivity is increasing annually as a consequence of global climate change. This rise in rainfall erosivity has resulted in a corresponding increase in soil erosion in the study area, which obscures the positive impact of human activities in the reduction of soil erosion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"196 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13293-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human activities have significant influence on soil erosion in karst areas. The spatial and temporal evolution of soil erosion in Guizhou Province was evaluated using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), which revealed an increasing trend in the initial data analysis for the soil erosion modulus. To disclose the impact of human activities on regional soil erosion, the soil erosion in 2000, 2010, and 2020 was analyzed. The results show the following: (1) The average values of the soil erosion modulus in the study area for 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 4.479, 4.945, and 5.806 t·hm−2·a−1, respectively; when considering human activities without the influence of rainfall erosivity, these values were 4.679, 4.963, and 4.799 t·hm−2·a−1. The influence of human activities on soil erosion is gradually becoming a positive force. (2) According to the Spearman regression analysis, the top four factors related to soil erosion in 2000 and 2010 were soil loss risk (E, 0.721 and 0.737), anti-erosion factors (Pr, − 0.236 and − 0.221), rock exposure rate (0.222 and 0.279), and altitude (0.210 and 0.195). In 2020, the top four factors were Pr (0.725), land surface temperature (LST, 0.268), NDVI (− 0.232), and E (0.186). In the first two stages, soil erosion is closely related to natural factors, while in 2020, soil erosion is more closely related to human activities. (3) The geographically weighted regression (GWR) showed the highest range of regression coefficients for Pr (150), followed by E and NDVI (25), rock exposure rate (10), and land surface temperature (LST) (1.5). The rainfall erosivity is increasing annually as a consequence of global climate change. This rise in rainfall erosivity has resulted in a corresponding increase in soil erosion in the study area, which obscures the positive impact of human activities in the reduction of soil erosion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 RUSLE 模型定量分析中国贵州典型岩溶地区人类活动对水土流失的影响。
人类活动对岩溶地区的水土流失有重大影响。利用修订的通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)对贵州省土壤侵蚀的时空演变进行了评估,初步数据分析显示土壤侵蚀模数呈上升趋势。为了揭示人类活动对区域土壤侵蚀的影响,对 2000 年、2010 年和 2020 年的土壤侵蚀情况进行了分析。结果显示如下(1)研究区域 2000 年、2010 年和 2020 年的土壤侵蚀模数平均值分别为 4.479、4.945 和 5.806 t-hm-2-a-1;在不考虑降雨侵蚀性影响的情况下,考虑人类活动的土壤侵蚀模数平均值分别为 4.679、4.963 和 4.799 t-hm-2-a-1。人类活动对水土流失的影响逐渐成为一种正向作用力。(2)根据斯皮尔曼回归分析,2000 年和 2010 年与水土流失相关的前四个因子分别为土壤流失风险(E,0.721 和 0.737)、抗侵蚀因子(Pr,- 0.236 和 - 0.221)、岩石裸露率(0.222 和 0.279)、海拔高度(0.210 和 0.195)。2020 年,排在前四位的因子分别是 Pr(0.725)、地表温度(LST,0.268)、NDVI(- 0.232)和 E(0.186)。在前两个阶段,土壤侵蚀与自然因素密切相关,而在 2020 年,土壤侵蚀与人类活动的关系更为密切。(3) 地理加权回归(GWR)显示,Pr 的回归系数范围最大(150),其次是 E 和 NDVI(25)、岩石裸露率(10)和地表温度(LST)(1.5)。由于全球气候变化,降雨侵蚀率逐年上升。降雨侵蚀率的上升导致研究区域土壤侵蚀的相应增加,从而掩盖了人类活动在减少土壤侵蚀方面的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal(loid)s pollution in soils of a typical agricultural and rural area: Source apportionment and derived risk quantification Spatial distribution patterns and hotspots of extreme agro-climatic resources in the Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia Health risks and pathological effects of heavy metals in Oreochromis mossambicus from Usuma River, Nigeria Comprehensive assessment of fish diversity and water health in river Indus, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Enhanced removal of methyl orange and malachite green using mesoporous TO@CTAB nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization, optimization and real wastewater treatment efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1