Masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic appliances.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05054-3
Rungtiwa Jirawiwatsaree, Chidsanu Changsiripun
{"title":"Masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic appliances.","authors":"Rungtiwa Jirawiwatsaree, Chidsanu Changsiripun","doi":"10.1186/s12903-024-05054-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clear thermoplastic materials are used in a variety of oral appliances. In some situations, patients may wear clear thermoplastic appliances while eating. However, the effect of wearing clear thermoplastic appliances on chewing efficiency is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic retainers over a 6-month period, and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients who received upper and lower clear retainers after debonding fixed appliances were examined for objective and subjective masticatory function at retainer delivery (T0), 3-month (T1), and 6-month follow-ups (T2) in two conditions: with and without wearing their retainers while chewing. The objective method used multiple sieves reported as the median particle size (MPS). The food intake ability (FIA) test served as the subjective method. Paired t-test was used to compare the outcomes between chewing with and without retainers at each evaluation time point. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare the outcomes between the three evaluating time points. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess whether age, sex, and extraction/non-extraction was associated with these effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MPS was significantly greater when chewing with retainers compared with chewing without them at T0 (P < 0.05), however, it was not significantly greater at T1 and T2 (P > 0.05). The MPS with and without the retainers tend to decrease between T0, T1 and T2. In particular, the MPS while chewing with retainers significantly decreased between T0 and T1. The total FIA score and FIA subscores for hard and soft food were significantly lower when eating with retainers at T0 (P < 0.05), however, all FIA scores when eating without retainers did not significantly change between T0, T1, and T2. No significantly associated factors were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearing clear retainers while chewing decreases objective and subjective masticatory function immediately after completing orthodontic treatment. However, this significantly improved to levels comparable to chewing without retainers after a 3-month follow-up. Age, sex, and extraction/non-extraction treatment were not associated with the difference in masticatory function while chewing with and without wearing the retainers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"1343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05054-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clear thermoplastic materials are used in a variety of oral appliances. In some situations, patients may wear clear thermoplastic appliances while eating. However, the effect of wearing clear thermoplastic appliances on chewing efficiency is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic retainers over a 6-month period, and its associated factors.

Methods: Thirty patients who received upper and lower clear retainers after debonding fixed appliances were examined for objective and subjective masticatory function at retainer delivery (T0), 3-month (T1), and 6-month follow-ups (T2) in two conditions: with and without wearing their retainers while chewing. The objective method used multiple sieves reported as the median particle size (MPS). The food intake ability (FIA) test served as the subjective method. Paired t-test was used to compare the outcomes between chewing with and without retainers at each evaluation time point. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare the outcomes between the three evaluating time points. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess whether age, sex, and extraction/non-extraction was associated with these effects.

Results: The MPS was significantly greater when chewing with retainers compared with chewing without them at T0 (P < 0.05), however, it was not significantly greater at T1 and T2 (P > 0.05). The MPS with and without the retainers tend to decrease between T0, T1 and T2. In particular, the MPS while chewing with retainers significantly decreased between T0 and T1. The total FIA score and FIA subscores for hard and soft food were significantly lower when eating with retainers at T0 (P < 0.05), however, all FIA scores when eating without retainers did not significantly change between T0, T1, and T2. No significantly associated factors were identified.

Conclusions: Wearing clear retainers while chewing decreases objective and subjective masticatory function immediately after completing orthodontic treatment. However, this significantly improved to levels comparable to chewing without retainers after a 3-month follow-up. Age, sex, and extraction/non-extraction treatment were not associated with the difference in masticatory function while chewing with and without wearing the retainers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佩戴和不佩戴透明热塑矫形器咀嚼时的咀嚼功能。
背景:透明热塑材料可用于各种口腔矫治器。在某些情况下,患者可能会在进食时佩戴透明热塑矫治器。然而,佩戴透明热塑矫治器对咀嚼效率的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估佩戴透明热塑保持器和不佩戴透明热塑保持器 6 个月期间咀嚼功能的差异及其相关因素:方法:30 名患者在固定矫治器脱钩后接受了上下透明保持器,在保持器交付(T0)、3 个月(T1)和 6 个月随访(T2)时,在咀嚼时佩戴和不佩戴保持器两种情况下对其咀嚼功能进行了客观和主观检查。客观方法采用多筛法,以中位数粒度(MPS)报告。食物摄入能力(FIA)测试作为主观方法。在每个评估时间点,使用配对 t 检验比较戴保持器和不戴保持器时的咀嚼结果。在比较三个评估时间点的结果时,采用了重复测量方差分析,然后进行了 Bonferroni 事后检验。进行了多变量线性回归分析,以评估年龄、性别和拔牙/未拔牙是否与这些影响相关:T0时,戴保持器咀嚼时的MPS明显高于不戴保持器咀嚼时的MPS(P 0.05)。在 T0、T1 和 T2 之间,带和不带保持器时的 MPS 都呈下降趋势。特别是,带保持器咀嚼时的 MPS 在 T0 和 T1 之间明显下降。在 T0 戴保持器进食时,FIA 总分以及 FIA 硬质食物和软质食物的子分都明显降低(P 结论:戴保持器进食时,MPS 明显降低:咀嚼时佩戴透明保持器会降低完成正畸治疗后的客观和主观咀嚼功能。但是,在 3 个月的随访后,这种情况会明显改善,达到与不戴保持器时的咀嚼功能相当的水平。年龄、性别和拔牙/非拔牙治疗与戴保持器和不戴保持器时咀嚼功能的差异无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of pain intensity and airway changes in non-growing patients treated by MARPE with and without micro-osteoperforation: a randomized clinical trial. Evaluation of post-extraction healing after atraumatic extraction in gutka chewers and non-gutka chewers using the modified inflammation proliferation remodeling scale. Evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in Pakistani population using the new classification: a CBCT study. Final year oral hygiene students' perceptions and reflections on experiential learning in a special needs oral health care program. Multimorbidity and tooth loss: data from Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1