Progress in geriatric pharmacology: Improving drug development, evaluation and use for ageing populations

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16330
Sarah N. Hilmer, Danijela Gnjidic
{"title":"Progress in geriatric pharmacology: Improving drug development, evaluation and use for ageing populations","authors":"Sarah N. Hilmer,&nbsp;Danijela Gnjidic","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ageing of the population worldwide, with the age-associated increase in multimorbidity, means that older people are now the major users of therapeutic drugs. Ensuring optimal drug development, evaluation and use by older people is an urgent priority for the global clinical pharmacology community. This special edition builds on presentations and discussions from a geriatric pharmacology seminar and a deprescribing workshop led by the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) Geriatric Committee at the World Congress of Pharmacology, Glasgow, 2023. It includes reviews and translational research on some of the challenges and proposed solutions to providing quality use of medicines for older people.</p><p>Prescribing for older people has relied on evidence that may not be generalizable to them for far too long. Pre-clinical evidence has been limited to studies in young, male rodents. The commentary by Mitchell et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> highlights the importance of pre-clinical drug evaluation in models that are representative of the older people who will use the drugs in terms of age, sex, frailty and drug exposures (e.g., polypharmacy). Similarly, there are international calls for representative recruitment of frail older people to clinical trials.<span><sup>2</sup></span> The review by Nguyen et al.<span><sup>3</sup></span> identified clinical pharmacology studies that have conducted subgroup analyses according to frailty. The measurement and effect of frailty on efficacy and safety outcomes differed between drugs and studies.</p><p>Prescribers rely on the adage, ‘start low, go slow’ to select safe and effective drug doses for older adults, aiming to reduce the risk of adverse effects in this vulnerable population. However, frail older people are also vulnerable to disease and need drugs at doses that are effective. Pharmacometrics, encompassing physiological pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling, can improve dose selection for such patients to optimize both safety and efficacy. Population pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of levofloxacin were applied to older patients with pneumonia in the study by He et al.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This study highlighted some of the challenges of studies in older patients, such as obtaining accurate measures of weight, as well as the opportunities to apply this method using convenience sampling times. Pharmacometrics studies are now starting to investigate the effects of frailty on pharmacokinetics.</p><p>Another prescribing technique for older adults is the ‘geriatrician's salute’, also known as deprescribing.<span><sup>5</sup></span> A major barrier to deprescribing in practice is a lack of evidence on its effects, making it difficult to practice ‘<i>informed</i> shared decision-making’. In this special issue, three complementary systematic reviews tackle this issue. The first has a disease focus, investigating the effect of deprescribing heart failure pharmacotherapy in older people.<span><sup>6</sup></span> The second has a drug focus: deprescribing diuretics,<span><sup>7</sup></span> which are most often prescribed for either heart failure or hypertension. Both reviews highlighted the lack of high-quality evidence on the feasibility, safety and tolerability of deprescribing, with no studies reporting on the outcomes according to frailty status of participants. The third examines the role of technology to enhance deprescribing. It found that existing applications focused on education and identified future opportunities to including interactive elements and artificial intelligence to enhance their utility in clinical care.<span><sup>8</sup></span></p><p>Real-world data are critically important for understanding drug effects in older adults, who are under-represented in clinical trials. The review by Kalisch Ellett et al.<span><sup>9</sup></span> describes novel, innovative methods in pharmacovigilance studies of drug use and outcomes in older people, including harnessing digital health technologies such as integration of electronic health records with routine adverse event reporting systems and the role of wearables. Older people residing in aged care homes are particularly under-represented in clinical trials and extremely vulnerable to medication-related harms. The review by Ea et al.<span><sup>10</sup></span> highlights innovations and gaps in generating and translating evidence for safe and effective medication management in aged care homes through effective partnerships with aged care homes and provider organizations and by leveraging existing data and knowledge sharing through international platforms.</p><p>The papers in this special issue feature key opportunities for applying innovations in clinical pharmacology to improve prescribing for geriatric patients. Some key challenges identified are lack of translatable pre-clinical models and representative recruitment in clinical trials and some cohort studies. Multifactorial geriatric giants (e.g., falls, frailty and cognitive impairment) and other outcomes that matter most to older people (e.g., functional independence and social connectedness) must be addressed. These need to be routinely captured in baseline data and as outcomes in all phases of research. Even if they were captured, it is difficult to recognize adverse drug events and adverse drug withdrawal events when they present non-specifically as geriatric giants. Further innovations in each phase of the drug development and evaluation pathway, using bioinformatics to consider the complexity of older people, will enable personalized medicine for frail older people with a lifetime of exposures, multimorbidity, frailty and polypharmacy.</p><p>Sarah N. Hilmer is Chair of the IUPHAR Clinical and Translational Section and Chair of its Geriatric Committee. She proposed and chaired the geriatric pharmacology seminar and deprescribing workshop at the World Congress of Pharmacology, Glasgow, 2023. She spoke in the symposium on ‘Translational approaches to optimising pharmacotherapy for older people: Controversies in geriatric pharmacology’. Danijela Gnjidic presented in the deprescribing workshop at the World Congress of Pharmacology, Glasgow, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"91 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16330","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ageing of the population worldwide, with the age-associated increase in multimorbidity, means that older people are now the major users of therapeutic drugs. Ensuring optimal drug development, evaluation and use by older people is an urgent priority for the global clinical pharmacology community. This special edition builds on presentations and discussions from a geriatric pharmacology seminar and a deprescribing workshop led by the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) Geriatric Committee at the World Congress of Pharmacology, Glasgow, 2023. It includes reviews and translational research on some of the challenges and proposed solutions to providing quality use of medicines for older people.

Prescribing for older people has relied on evidence that may not be generalizable to them for far too long. Pre-clinical evidence has been limited to studies in young, male rodents. The commentary by Mitchell et al.1 highlights the importance of pre-clinical drug evaluation in models that are representative of the older people who will use the drugs in terms of age, sex, frailty and drug exposures (e.g., polypharmacy). Similarly, there are international calls for representative recruitment of frail older people to clinical trials.2 The review by Nguyen et al.3 identified clinical pharmacology studies that have conducted subgroup analyses according to frailty. The measurement and effect of frailty on efficacy and safety outcomes differed between drugs and studies.

Prescribers rely on the adage, ‘start low, go slow’ to select safe and effective drug doses for older adults, aiming to reduce the risk of adverse effects in this vulnerable population. However, frail older people are also vulnerable to disease and need drugs at doses that are effective. Pharmacometrics, encompassing physiological pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling, can improve dose selection for such patients to optimize both safety and efficacy. Population pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of levofloxacin were applied to older patients with pneumonia in the study by He et al.4 This study highlighted some of the challenges of studies in older patients, such as obtaining accurate measures of weight, as well as the opportunities to apply this method using convenience sampling times. Pharmacometrics studies are now starting to investigate the effects of frailty on pharmacokinetics.

Another prescribing technique for older adults is the ‘geriatrician's salute’, also known as deprescribing.5 A major barrier to deprescribing in practice is a lack of evidence on its effects, making it difficult to practice ‘informed shared decision-making’. In this special issue, three complementary systematic reviews tackle this issue. The first has a disease focus, investigating the effect of deprescribing heart failure pharmacotherapy in older people.6 The second has a drug focus: deprescribing diuretics,7 which are most often prescribed for either heart failure or hypertension. Both reviews highlighted the lack of high-quality evidence on the feasibility, safety and tolerability of deprescribing, with no studies reporting on the outcomes according to frailty status of participants. The third examines the role of technology to enhance deprescribing. It found that existing applications focused on education and identified future opportunities to including interactive elements and artificial intelligence to enhance their utility in clinical care.8

Real-world data are critically important for understanding drug effects in older adults, who are under-represented in clinical trials. The review by Kalisch Ellett et al.9 describes novel, innovative methods in pharmacovigilance studies of drug use and outcomes in older people, including harnessing digital health technologies such as integration of electronic health records with routine adverse event reporting systems and the role of wearables. Older people residing in aged care homes are particularly under-represented in clinical trials and extremely vulnerable to medication-related harms. The review by Ea et al.10 highlights innovations and gaps in generating and translating evidence for safe and effective medication management in aged care homes through effective partnerships with aged care homes and provider organizations and by leveraging existing data and knowledge sharing through international platforms.

The papers in this special issue feature key opportunities for applying innovations in clinical pharmacology to improve prescribing for geriatric patients. Some key challenges identified are lack of translatable pre-clinical models and representative recruitment in clinical trials and some cohort studies. Multifactorial geriatric giants (e.g., falls, frailty and cognitive impairment) and other outcomes that matter most to older people (e.g., functional independence and social connectedness) must be addressed. These need to be routinely captured in baseline data and as outcomes in all phases of research. Even if they were captured, it is difficult to recognize adverse drug events and adverse drug withdrawal events when they present non-specifically as geriatric giants. Further innovations in each phase of the drug development and evaluation pathway, using bioinformatics to consider the complexity of older people, will enable personalized medicine for frail older people with a lifetime of exposures, multimorbidity, frailty and polypharmacy.

Sarah N. Hilmer is Chair of the IUPHAR Clinical and Translational Section and Chair of its Geriatric Committee. She proposed and chaired the geriatric pharmacology seminar and deprescribing workshop at the World Congress of Pharmacology, Glasgow, 2023. She spoke in the symposium on ‘Translational approaches to optimising pharmacotherapy for older people: Controversies in geriatric pharmacology’. Danijela Gnjidic presented in the deprescribing workshop at the World Congress of Pharmacology, Glasgow, 2023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年药理学的进展:改进针对老龄人口的药物开发、评估和使用。
全世界人口的老龄化以及与年龄相关的多种疾病的增加意味着老年人现在是治疗药物的主要使用者。确保老年人的最佳药物开发、评估和使用是全球临床药理学界的当务之急。本特别版以2023年格拉斯哥世界药理学大会上由国际基础和临床药理学联盟(IUPHAR)老年委员会领导的老年药理学研讨会和开处方研讨会的报告和讨论为基础。它包括对一些挑战的审查和转化研究,以及为老年人提供高质量用药的建议解决办法。长期以来,为老年人开处方所依赖的证据可能无法推广到他们身上。临床前证据仅限于对年轻的雄性啮齿动物的研究。Mitchell等人的评论1强调了临床前药物评估模型的重要性,这些模型代表了在年龄、性别、体质和药物暴露方面使用药物的老年人(例如,多种药物)。同样,国际上也呼吁招募有代表性的体弱老年人进行临床试验Nguyen等人的综述3确定了根据虚弱程度进行亚组分析的临床药理学研究。虚弱对疗效和安全性结果的测量和影响在不同的药物和研究中有所不同。开处方者依靠“低起点,慢行”这句格言来为老年人选择安全有效的药物剂量,旨在减少这一脆弱人群产生不良反应的风险。然而,体弱多病的老年人也容易患病,需要有效剂量的药物。药物计量学,包括生理药代动力学和药效学模型,可以改善这类患者的剂量选择,以优化安全性和有效性。He等人在研究中将左氧氟沙星的人群药代动力学和剂量优化应用于老年肺炎患者。4该研究强调了老年患者研究的一些挑战,例如获得准确的体重测量,以及使用方便采样时间应用该方法的机会。药物计量学研究现在开始调查虚弱对药代动力学的影响。另一种给老年人开处方的技巧是“老年病医生的致敬”,也被称为“开处方”在实践中限制处方的一个主要障碍是缺乏关于其效果的证据,这使得很难实践“知情的共同决策”。在本期特刊中,三篇相辅相成的系统综述探讨了这一问题。第一个研究以疾病为重点,研究老年人心衰药物治疗的效果第二种则以药物为重点:解除利尿剂处方,这是最常用于治疗心力衰竭或高血压的药物。两篇综述都强调缺乏关于处方的可行性、安全性和耐受性的高质量证据,也没有研究报告根据参与者虚弱状态的结果。第三部分考察了技术在加强处方方面的作用。研究发现,现有的应用侧重于教育,并确定了未来的机会,包括互动元素和人工智能,以增强其在临床护理中的效用。真实数据对于了解老年人的药物作用至关重要,而老年人在临床试验中代表性不足。Kalisch Ellett等人的评论9描述了老年人药物使用和结果的药物警戒研究中的新颖创新方法,包括利用数字健康技术,如将电子健康记录与常规不良事件报告系统集成以及可穿戴设备的作用。居住在养老院的老年人在临床试验中的代表性尤其不足,而且极易受到药物相关伤害。Ea等人的回顾突出了通过与养老院和提供者组织的有效伙伴关系以及通过国际平台利用现有数据和知识共享,为养老院安全有效的药物管理产生和转化证据方面的创新和差距。本特刊的论文介绍了应用临床药理学创新来改善老年患者处方的关键机会。确定的一些关键挑战是缺乏可翻译的临床前模型和在临床试验和一些队列研究中具有代表性的招募。必须解决多因素老年问题(如跌倒、虚弱和认知障碍)以及对老年人最重要的其他后果(如功能独立和社会联系)。 这些需要在基线数据中常规捕获,并作为研究所有阶段的结果。即使它们被捕获,当它们非特异性地呈现为老年巨人时,也很难识别药物不良事件和药物不良戒断事件。在药物开发和评估途径的每个阶段进一步创新,利用生物信息学来考虑老年人的复杂性,将为终身暴露、多种疾病、虚弱和多种药物的体弱多病的老年人提供个性化医疗。Sarah N. Hilmer是IUPHAR临床和转化部门的主席,也是老年委员会的主席。她提议并主持了2023年格拉斯哥世界药理学大会的老年药理学研讨会和处方研讨会。她在题为“优化老年人药物治疗的转化方法:老年药理学的争议”的研讨会上发言。Danijela Gnjidic在2023年格拉斯哥世界药理学大会的处方研讨会上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
HLA genotype testing for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx). A survey of community pharmacists perspectives on monitoring antidepressant adverse events. The interplay of GLP-1 receptor agonist use, chronic kidney disease and fracture risk in obese pAtients: a retrospective cohort study. Practice, knowledge and attitude of physicians and pharmacists towards the spontaneous reporting system of adverse drug reactions in Switzerland. Dose effect of buspirone combined with clozapine on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1