Morbidity and quality of life of totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (CKLASS01).
Yu Zhang, Ziyu Li, Yantao Tian, Jiang Yu, Jieti Wang, Changmin Lee, Kuan Wang, Xianli He, Qing Qiao, Gang Ji, Zekuan Xu, Li Yang, Hao Xu, Xiaohui Du, Xiangqian Su, Jiadi Xing, Zhaojian Niu, Linghua Zhu, Su Yan, Yong Li, Junjiang Wang, Zhengrong Li, Yongliang Zhao, Jun You, Changqing Jing, Lin Fan, Yian Du, Gaoping Zhao, Wu Song, Yi Xuan, Mingde Zang, Jie Chen, Sungsoo Park, Hua Huang
{"title":"Morbidity and quality of life of totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial (CKLASS01).","authors":"Yu Zhang, Ziyu Li, Yantao Tian, Jiang Yu, Jieti Wang, Changmin Lee, Kuan Wang, Xianli He, Qing Qiao, Gang Ji, Zekuan Xu, Li Yang, Hao Xu, Xiaohui Du, Xiangqian Su, Jiadi Xing, Zhaojian Niu, Linghua Zhu, Su Yan, Yong Li, Junjiang Wang, Zhengrong Li, Yongliang Zhao, Jun You, Changqing Jing, Lin Fan, Yian Du, Gaoping Zhao, Wu Song, Yi Xuan, Mingde Zang, Jie Chen, Sungsoo Park, Hua Huang","doi":"10.1007/s10120-024-01561-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for early gastric cancer (EGC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phase III, prospective, multi-center RCT was conducted, wherein patients (n = 442) with clinical stage I gastric cancer eligible for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were randomized 1:1 to the TLDG or the LADG group. Postoperative morbidity and quality of life (QoL) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 422 patients were assessed (TLDG, 216; LADG, 206) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. The morbidity rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (TLDG, 6.0%; LADG, 5.8%; P = 0.93). The 90-day mortality rate was comparable between the groups (TLDG, 0.5%; LADG, 0.0%; P > 0.99). TLDG was significantly associated with a lower pain score compared with LADG in patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (P = 0.002) at 24 h postoperatively. Moreover, TLDG significantly improved QoL in terms of C30 social functioning at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04), C30 global health status at 3 months (P = 0.02), and STO22 body image at 3 months (P = 0.01), with differences dissipating at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TLDG is not superior to LADG in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, but it provides better C30 social functioning at 3 and 6 months, C30 global health status and STO22 body image at 3 months, and reduces early postoperative pain for patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03393182.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01561-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for early gastric cancer (EGC).
Methods: A phase III, prospective, multi-center RCT was conducted, wherein patients (n = 442) with clinical stage I gastric cancer eligible for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were randomized 1:1 to the TLDG or the LADG group. Postoperative morbidity and quality of life (QoL) were compared.
Results: In total, 422 patients were assessed (TLDG, 216; LADG, 206) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. The morbidity rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (TLDG, 6.0%; LADG, 5.8%; P = 0.93). The 90-day mortality rate was comparable between the groups (TLDG, 0.5%; LADG, 0.0%; P > 0.99). TLDG was significantly associated with a lower pain score compared with LADG in patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.002) at 24 h postoperatively. Moreover, TLDG significantly improved QoL in terms of C30 social functioning at 3 and 6 months (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04), C30 global health status at 3 months (P = 0.02), and STO22 body image at 3 months (P = 0.01), with differences dissipating at 12 months.
Conclusions: TLDG is not superior to LADG in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, but it provides better C30 social functioning at 3 and 6 months, C30 global health status and STO22 body image at 3 months, and reduces early postoperative pain for patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2.
期刊介绍：
Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide.
The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics.
Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field.
With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
