Workplace Violence in a Large Urban Emergency Department.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43160
Marla C Doehring, Megan Palmer, Ashley Satorius, Tabitha Vaughn, Bruck Mulat, Andrew Beckman, Kyra Reed, Theresa Spech Dos Santos, Benton R Hunter
{"title":"Workplace Violence in a Large Urban Emergency Department.","authors":"Marla C Doehring, Megan Palmer, Ashley Satorius, Tabitha Vaughn, Bruck Mulat, Andrew Beckman, Kyra Reed, Theresa Spech Dos Santos, Benton R Hunter","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers (HCWs) is common and likely underreported. Reliable data on the incidence of WPV and its impact on victims are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To prospectively define the frequency of WPV against HCWs in the emergency department (ED), examine whether HCW demographics are associated with increased risk, and explore the impact of these events on HCWs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted over 2 months in 2023 (August 28 to October 22, 2023) in the ED of a large, urban, academic safety net hospital in the US. Participants included ED physicians, nurses, and other HCWs, who were asked to complete a brief so-called shift sheet for every ED shift worked during the study period.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>WPV as recorded on shift sheets.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the number of events per shift. Events were coded for severity (types 1-5) and gender- or race and ethnicity-related bias. Shift sheets asked for the participant's demographics and whether they experienced verbal or physical abuse during the shift. If so, they were asked to provide a description; rate the impact the event had on them; and indicate whether they felt the event was sexist, racist, or otherwise biased. Perceived impact was recorded, and demographic characteristics associated with the likelihood of experiencing WPV were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 72 HCWs who participated in the study, 52 were female (72%). A total of 575 shift sheets were returned of an estimated 1250 possible (46%), with 155 events, including 77 type 1 events (50%; shouting, yelling, or insults), 29 type 2 events (19%; threats of physical or sexual violence, death threats, or use of slurs), and 39 type 3 events (25%; physical violence); there was a mean (SD) of 3.7 (1.9) shifts per 1 event. No type 4 or 5 events, which involve physical violence causing grievous injuries requiring medical attention and, in the case of type 5 events, permanent disability or death, were recorded. Ten events could not be coded. Sexist or racist bias occurred in 38 events (25%) and 11 events (7%), respectively. Participants reported how the event impacted them in 133 events. Of those, moderate or severe impact was reported in 32 (24%) and mild to no effect in 101 (76%). There was no association between self-reported impact and coded severity of events. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, a higher likelihood of experiencing WPV on any given shift was independently associated with being in the nursing role (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.0) and being age 40 years or younger (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of HCWs in the ED, participants experienced WPV once every 3.7 shifts. The nursing role and younger age were associated with increased risk. These results highlight an urgent need to identify interventions to support and protect HCWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2443160"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers (HCWs) is common and likely underreported. Reliable data on the incidence of WPV and its impact on victims are lacking.

Objective: To prospectively define the frequency of WPV against HCWs in the emergency department (ED), examine whether HCW demographics are associated with increased risk, and explore the impact of these events on HCWs.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted over 2 months in 2023 (August 28 to October 22, 2023) in the ED of a large, urban, academic safety net hospital in the US. Participants included ED physicians, nurses, and other HCWs, who were asked to complete a brief so-called shift sheet for every ED shift worked during the study period.

Exposure: WPV as recorded on shift sheets.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the number of events per shift. Events were coded for severity (types 1-5) and gender- or race and ethnicity-related bias. Shift sheets asked for the participant's demographics and whether they experienced verbal or physical abuse during the shift. If so, they were asked to provide a description; rate the impact the event had on them; and indicate whether they felt the event was sexist, racist, or otherwise biased. Perceived impact was recorded, and demographic characteristics associated with the likelihood of experiencing WPV were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among 72 HCWs who participated in the study, 52 were female (72%). A total of 575 shift sheets were returned of an estimated 1250 possible (46%), with 155 events, including 77 type 1 events (50%; shouting, yelling, or insults), 29 type 2 events (19%; threats of physical or sexual violence, death threats, or use of slurs), and 39 type 3 events (25%; physical violence); there was a mean (SD) of 3.7 (1.9) shifts per 1 event. No type 4 or 5 events, which involve physical violence causing grievous injuries requiring medical attention and, in the case of type 5 events, permanent disability or death, were recorded. Ten events could not be coded. Sexist or racist bias occurred in 38 events (25%) and 11 events (7%), respectively. Participants reported how the event impacted them in 133 events. Of those, moderate or severe impact was reported in 32 (24%) and mild to no effect in 101 (76%). There was no association between self-reported impact and coded severity of events. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, a higher likelihood of experiencing WPV on any given shift was independently associated with being in the nursing role (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.0) and being age 40 years or younger (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of HCWs in the ED, participants experienced WPV once every 3.7 shifts. The nursing role and younger age were associated with increased risk. These results highlight an urgent need to identify interventions to support and protect HCWs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型城市急诊室中的工作场所暴力。
重要性:针对医护人员(HCWs)的工作场所暴力(WPV)很常见,但很可能未得到充分报告。目前还缺乏有关 WPV 发生率及其对受害者影响的可靠数据:前瞻性地确定急诊科(ED)中针对医护人员的 WPV 事件的发生频率,研究医护人员的人口统计学特征是否与风险增加有关,并探讨这些事件对医护人员的影响:这项横断面研究于 2023 年在美国一家大型城市学术安全网医院的急诊科进行,历时 2 个月(2023 年 8 月 28 日至 10 月 22 日)。参与者包括急诊科医生、护士和其他医护人员,他们被要求在研究期间的每一次急诊科轮班中填写一份简短的所谓轮班表:主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是每班发生的事件数量。对事件的严重程度(1-5 类)以及性别或种族和民族偏见进行编码。轮班表要求填写参与者的人口统计数据,以及他们在轮班期间是否遭受过言语或身体虐待。如果有,则要求他们提供描述;评价该事件对他们的影响;并指出他们是否认为该事件具有性别歧视、种族主义或其他偏见。记录所感受到的影响,并使用多变量逻辑回归分析探讨与遭遇 WPV 可能性相关的人口特征:在参与研究的 72 名医护人员中,52 人为女性(占 72%)。在估计可能发生的 1250 起事件中,共收回了 575 份轮班表(46%),发生了 155 起事件,其中包括 77 起 1 类事件(50%;大喊大叫或侮辱)、29 起 2 类事件(19%;身体或性暴力威胁、死亡威胁或使用污言秽语)和 39 起 3 类事件(25%;身体暴力);平均(标清)每发生 1 起事件需要轮班 3.7 次(1.9 次)。没有第 4 类和第 5 类事件的记录,第 4 类和第 5 类事件涉及身体暴力,造成严重伤害,需要就医,而第 5 类事件则造成终身残疾或死亡。有 10 起事件无法编码。性别歧视或种族主义偏见分别发生在 38 起事件(25%)和 11 起事件(7%)中。在 133 起事件中,参与者报告了事件对他们的影响。其中,32 人(24%)报告了中度或严重影响,101 人(76%)报告了轻度或无影响。自我报告的影响与事件的编码严重程度之间没有关联。在一项多变量逻辑回归分析中,在任何特定班次中经历 WPV 的可能性较高与护理角色(几率比为 3.1;95% CI,1.9-5.0)和年龄在 40 岁或以下(几率比为 2.0;95% CI,1.2-3.5)独立相关:在这项针对急诊室医护人员的横断面研究中,参与者每 3.7 个班次中就有一次感染 WPV 的经历。护理角色和年轻与风险增加有关。这些结果凸显了确定干预措施以支持和保护高危护理人员的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Network Open. Meal Timing Interventions for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health-What Does the Evidence Tell Us So Far? Saving Children's Lives Through Universal Pediatric Readiness Is a Wise Investment. Anemia Acuity Effect on Transfusion Strategies in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the MINT Trial. Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1