Safe and effective pressure of endotracheal tube suctioning based on sputum viscosity grades during artificial airway open suctioning procedures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13203
Weiquan Liu, Chunling Gu, Miqi Li, Jie Xiong
{"title":"Safe and effective pressure of endotracheal tube suctioning based on sputum viscosity grades during artificial airway open suctioning procedures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Weiquan Liu, Chunling Gu, Miqi Li, Jie Xiong","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal tube suctioning is an effective measure to ensure airway patency during mechanical ventilation; however, inappropriate suction pressure often leads to many adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate safe and effective suction pressures and intracatheter pressure ranges during artificial airway open suctioning procedures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 438 patients receiving mechanical ventilation in China were divided into nine groups according to their sputum viscosity grades and suction pressure. A random sampling method was used to select one of the three pressure groups (low-, medium- and high-pressure groups). Registered intensive care unit (ICU) nurses performed open suction manoeuvres of the artificial airway based on the pressures set by the researchers. Two teaching supervisors observed and recorded the sputum viscosity, suction pressure, minimum intracatheter pressure, maximum intracatheter pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulse oxygen saturation, airway mucosal bleeding and sputum sound improvement score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study finally included 438 patients. The results showed that the safe and effective suction pressures were 80-120 mmHg for grade I sputum viscosity, 150 mmHg for grade II sputum viscosity and 200 mmHg for grade III sputum viscosity in open suction procedures for ICU patients. These pressure values were associated with the lowest changes in heart rate, mean arterial pressure and pulse oxygen saturation; the lowest incidence of airway mucosal bleeding; and the highest sputum sound improvement score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an open suction procedure, accurate setting of safe and effective suction pressure for sputum of different viscosity grades can not only achieve the suction effect but also have minimal impact on the vital signs and airway mucosal bleeding of patients.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The findings can guide critical care nurses to accurately select safe and effective initial suction pressure values rather than use general ranges when performing artificial airway open suctioning procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal tube suctioning is an effective measure to ensure airway patency during mechanical ventilation; however, inappropriate suction pressure often leads to many adverse effects.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate safe and effective suction pressures and intracatheter pressure ranges during artificial airway open suctioning procedures.

Study design: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 438 patients receiving mechanical ventilation in China were divided into nine groups according to their sputum viscosity grades and suction pressure. A random sampling method was used to select one of the three pressure groups (low-, medium- and high-pressure groups). Registered intensive care unit (ICU) nurses performed open suction manoeuvres of the artificial airway based on the pressures set by the researchers. Two teaching supervisors observed and recorded the sputum viscosity, suction pressure, minimum intracatheter pressure, maximum intracatheter pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulse oxygen saturation, airway mucosal bleeding and sputum sound improvement score.

Results: This study finally included 438 patients. The results showed that the safe and effective suction pressures were 80-120 mmHg for grade I sputum viscosity, 150 mmHg for grade II sputum viscosity and 200 mmHg for grade III sputum viscosity in open suction procedures for ICU patients. These pressure values were associated with the lowest changes in heart rate, mean arterial pressure and pulse oxygen saturation; the lowest incidence of airway mucosal bleeding; and the highest sputum sound improvement score.

Conclusions: In an open suction procedure, accurate setting of safe and effective suction pressure for sputum of different viscosity grades can not only achieve the suction effect but also have minimal impact on the vital signs and airway mucosal bleeding of patients.

Relevance to clinical practice: The findings can guide critical care nurses to accurately select safe and effective initial suction pressure values rather than use general ranges when performing artificial airway open suctioning procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工气道开放吸引过程中基于痰液粘度等级的安全有效气管导管吸引压力:双盲随机对照试验。
背景:目的:本研究旨在探讨人工气道开放吸引过程中安全有效的吸引压力和导管内压力范围:在这项双盲随机对照试验中,438 名接受机械通气的中国患者根据痰液粘度等级和吸痰压力被分为九组。采用随机抽样的方法从三个压力组(低压组、中压组和高压组)中选择一组。重症监护室(ICU)的注册护士根据研究人员设定的压力对人工气道进行开放式吸痰操作。两名教学督导观察并记录痰液粘度、吸痰压力、导管内最低压力、导管内最高压力、心率、平均动脉压、脉搏氧饱和度、气道粘膜出血量和痰声改善评分:本研究最终纳入了 438 名患者。结果显示,ICU 患者开放式抽吸术的安全有效抽吸压力为:I 级痰液粘度 80-120 mmHg,II 级痰液粘度 150 mmHg,III 级痰液粘度 200 mmHg。这些压力值与心率、平均动脉压和脉搏氧饱和度的最低变化、气道粘膜出血的最低发生率以及痰声改善的最高评分相关:结论:在开放式吸痰术中,针对不同黏度等级的痰液准确设定安全有效的吸痰压力,不仅能达到吸痰效果,而且对患者生命体征和气道黏膜出血的影响最小:研究结果可指导重症监护护士在进行人工气道开放式吸痰操作时,准确选择安全有效的初始吸痰压力值,而不是使用一般范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions to support the cognitive rehabilitation of patients admitted to the intensive care unit: An umbrella review. Safe and effective pressure of endotracheal tube suctioning based on sputum viscosity grades during artificial airway open suctioning procedures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clotted blood samples in the neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study to evaluate interventions to reduce blood sample clotting. Prediction of mortality in ICU patients: A comparison between the SOFA score and other indicators. Change in prefilter pressure as a key determinant in the decision to return blood in continuous renal replacement therapy: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1