Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory-synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation.
Jie Li, Paul Karabelas, Lingyue Gong, Caylie A Sheridan, James B Fink
{"title":"Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory-synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation.","authors":"Jie Li, Paul Karabelas, Lingyue Gong, Caylie A Sheridan, James B Fink","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y-piece, and between Y-piece and ETT (Y-ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y-ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inspiration-synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p < .05). The highest inhaled doses (42.2 ± 2.0% and 40.7 ± 1.0% for pediatric and neonate, respectively) were observed with the small-particle inspiration-synchronized VMN placed at Y-ETT. In the pediatric model, the inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronized conventional VMN was similar, independent of nebulizer placements (24.4 ~ 27.0%). In contrast, the inhaled dose was greatest with continuous VMN placed at the humidifier inlet. With the neonatal model, VMN placed at Y-ETT yielded higher doses than the humidifier inlet, and small-particle VMNs outperformed conventional VMNs across all settings (all p < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prototype small-particle VMN positioned between Y-piece and ETT in an inspiration-synchronized mode optimized aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation in both pediatric and neonatal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: An inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation.
Methods: A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y-piece, and between Y-piece and ETT (Y-ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y-ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm).
Results: The inspiration-synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p < .05). The highest inhaled doses (42.2 ± 2.0% and 40.7 ± 1.0% for pediatric and neonate, respectively) were observed with the small-particle inspiration-synchronized VMN placed at Y-ETT. In the pediatric model, the inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronized conventional VMN was similar, independent of nebulizer placements (24.4 ~ 27.0%). In contrast, the inhaled dose was greatest with continuous VMN placed at the humidifier inlet. With the neonatal model, VMN placed at Y-ETT yielded higher doses than the humidifier inlet, and small-particle VMNs outperformed conventional VMNs across all settings (all p < .05).
Conclusion: The prototype small-particle VMN positioned between Y-piece and ETT in an inspiration-synchronized mode optimized aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation in both pediatric and neonatal models.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.