Efficacy and safety of different antibiotic treatment versus surgical treatment for acute appendicitis: A network meta-analysis.

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared various antibiotic treatments with surgical treatment for acute appendicitis.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the prespecified inclusion criteria up to July 2023. The interventions included various antibiotics and surgery. The outcomes measured were initial treatment success, treatment success at 1-year follow-up, and treatment-related complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software with the gemtc package. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank the interventions.

Results: Thirteen RCTs involving nine treatments (cefotaxime [CTX] + tinidazole [TNZ], CTX + metronidazole [MTZ], ampicillin [AMP] + gentamicin [GEN] + MTZ, amoxicillin/clavulanate [AMC] + GEN, meropenem [MEM] + MTZ, AMC, ertapenem [ETP] + MTZ, ETP, and surgery) were included in this network meta-analysis. In head-to-head comparisons, no statistically significant difference was found between any two interventions for initial treatment success (p > 0.05). The SUCRA indicated that surgery ranked first (SUCRA, 66.5%) for initial treatment success. Surgery was associated with an increased treatment success rate at 1-year follow-up compared to AMC (OR = 0.01, 95% CrI = 0.00-0.14, p < 0.05), MEM + MTZ (OR = 0.06, 95% CrI = 0.00-0.42, p < 0.05), and AMP + GEN + MTZ (OR = 0.02, 95% CrI = 0.00-0.23, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between any two interventions regarding complications (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Our network meta-analysis suggests that surgery ranks highest for initial treatment success and treatment success at 1-year follow-up. However, surgery may increase the complication rate.