RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge Review and Outcomes Analysis.

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Radiology-Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1148/ryai.240334
Sebastiaan Hermans, Zixuan Hu, Robyn L Ball, Hui Ming Lin, Luciano M Prevedello, Ferco H Berger, Ibrahim Yusuf, Jeffrey D Rudie, Maryam Vazirabad, Adam E Flanders, George Shih, John Mongan, Savvas Nicolaou, Brett S Marinelli, Melissa A Davis, Kirti Magudia, Ervin Sejdić, Errol Colak
{"title":"RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge Review and Outcomes Analysis.","authors":"Sebastiaan Hermans, Zixuan Hu, Robyn L Ball, Hui Ming Lin, Luciano M Prevedello, Ferco H Berger, Ibrahim Yusuf, Jeffrey D Rudie, Maryam Vazirabad, Adam E Flanders, George Shih, John Mongan, Savvas Nicolaou, Brett S Marinelli, Melissa A Davis, Kirti Magudia, Ervin Sejdić, Errol Colak","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology: Artificial Intelligence</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i> Purpose To evaluate the performance of the winning machine learning (ML) models from the 2023 RSNA Abdominal Trauma Detection Artificial Intelligence Challenge. Materials and Methods The competition was hosted on Kaggle and took place between July 26, 2023, to October 15, 2023. The multicenter competition dataset consisted of 4,274 abdominal trauma CT scans in which solid organs (liver, spleen and kidneys) were annotated as healthy, low-grade or high-grade injury. Studies were labeled as positive or negative for the presence of bowel/mesenteric injury and active extravasation. In this study, performances of the 8 award-winning models were retrospectively assessed and compared using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), for each injury category. The reported mean values of these metrics were calculated by averaging the performance across all models for each specified injury type. Results The models exhibited strong performance in detecting solid organ injuries, particularly high-grade injuries. For binary detection of injuries, the models demonstrated mean AUC values of 0.92 (range:0.91-0.94) for liver, 0.91 (range:0.87-0.93) for splenic, and 0.94 (range:0.93-0.95) for kidney injuries. The models achieved mean AUC values of 0.98 (range:0.96-0.98) for high-grade liver, 0.98 (range:0.97-0.99) for high-grade splenic, and 0.98 (range:0.97-0.98) for high-grade kidney injuries. For the detection of bowel/mesenteric injuries and active extravasation, the models demonstrated mean AUC values of 0.85 (range:0.74-0.73) and 0.85 (range:0.79-0.89) respectively. Conclusion The award-winning models from the AI challenge demonstrated strong performance in the detection of traumatic abdominal injuries on CT scans, particularly high-grade injuries. These models may serve as a performance baseline for future investigations and algorithms. ©RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Purpose To evaluate the performance of the winning machine learning (ML) models from the 2023 RSNA Abdominal Trauma Detection Artificial Intelligence Challenge. Materials and Methods The competition was hosted on Kaggle and took place between July 26, 2023, to October 15, 2023. The multicenter competition dataset consisted of 4,274 abdominal trauma CT scans in which solid organs (liver, spleen and kidneys) were annotated as healthy, low-grade or high-grade injury. Studies were labeled as positive or negative for the presence of bowel/mesenteric injury and active extravasation. In this study, performances of the 8 award-winning models were retrospectively assessed and compared using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), for each injury category. The reported mean values of these metrics were calculated by averaging the performance across all models for each specified injury type. Results The models exhibited strong performance in detecting solid organ injuries, particularly high-grade injuries. For binary detection of injuries, the models demonstrated mean AUC values of 0.92 (range:0.91-0.94) for liver, 0.91 (range:0.87-0.93) for splenic, and 0.94 (range:0.93-0.95) for kidney injuries. The models achieved mean AUC values of 0.98 (range:0.96-0.98) for high-grade liver, 0.98 (range:0.97-0.99) for high-grade splenic, and 0.98 (range:0.97-0.98) for high-grade kidney injuries. For the detection of bowel/mesenteric injuries and active extravasation, the models demonstrated mean AUC values of 0.85 (range:0.74-0.73) and 0.85 (range:0.79-0.89) respectively. Conclusion The award-winning models from the AI challenge demonstrated strong performance in the detection of traumatic abdominal injuries on CT scans, particularly high-grade injuries. These models may serve as a performance baseline for future investigations and algorithms. ©RSNA, 2024.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RSNA 2023 腹部创伤人工智能挑战回顾与结果分析。
"刚刚接受 "的论文经过同行评审,已被接受在《放射学》上发表:人工智能》上发表。这篇文章在以最终版本发表之前,还将经过校对、排版和校对审核。请注意,在制作最终校对稿的过程中,可能会发现影响内容的错误。目的 评估 2023 年 RSNA 腹部创伤检测人工智能挑战赛获奖机器学习(ML)模型的性能。材料与方法 比赛在 Kaggle 上举办,时间为 2023 年 7 月 26 日至 2023 年 10 月 15 日。多中心竞赛数据集包括 4,274 份腹部创伤 CT 扫描,其中实体器官(肝脏、脾脏和肾脏)被标注为健康、低度或高度损伤。对于肠/括约肌损伤和活动性外渗,研究结果被标记为阳性或阴性。在本研究中,对 8 个获奖模型的性能进行了回顾性评估,并使用各种指标(包括接收器操作特征曲线下面积 (AUC))对每个损伤类别进行了比较。所报告的这些指标的平均值是通过对每种特定损伤类型的所有模型的性能进行平均计算得出的。结果 这些模型在检测实体器官损伤,尤其是高级别损伤方面表现出很强的性能。在损伤的二元检测中,模型对肝脏损伤的平均 AUC 值为 0.92(范围:0.91-0.94),对脾脏损伤的平均 AUC 值为 0.91(范围:0.87-0.93),对肾脏损伤的平均 AUC 值为 0.94(范围:0.93-0.95)。这些模型的平均 AUC 值分别为:高级别肝损伤 0.98(范围:0.96-0.98),高级别脾损伤 0.98(范围:0.97-0.99),高级别肾损伤 0.98(范围:0.97-0.98)。在检测肠道/肠膜损伤和活动性外渗方面,模型的平均 AUC 值分别为 0.85(范围:0.74-0.73)和 0.85(范围:0.79-0.89)。结论 在人工智能挑战赛中获奖的模型在检测 CT 扫描中的腹部创伤,尤其是高级别创伤方面表现出了很强的性能。这些模型可作为未来研究和算法的性能基线。©RSNA,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
期刊最新文献
Integrated Deep Learning Model for the Detection, Segmentation, and Morphologic Analysis of Intracranial Aneurysms Using CT Angiography. RSNA 2023 Abdominal Trauma AI Challenge Review and Outcomes Analysis. SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury on T2-weighted MRI Scans. Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Optimizing Performance of Transformer-based Models for Fetal Brain MR Image Segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1