What the visual system can learn from the non-dominant hand: The effect of graphomotor engagement on visual discrimination.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory & Cognition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01628-2
Shlomit Ben-Ami, Batel Buaron, Ori Yaron, Kyle Keane, Virginia H Sun, Flip Phillips, Jason Friedman, Pawan Sinha, Roy Mukamel
{"title":"What the visual system can learn from the non-dominant hand: The effect of graphomotor engagement on visual discrimination.","authors":"Shlomit Ben-Ami, Batel Buaron, Ori Yaron, Kyle Keane, Virginia H Sun, Flip Phillips, Jason Friedman, Pawan Sinha, Roy Mukamel","doi":"10.3758/s13421-024-01628-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that engaging in graphomotor activity for creating graphemes can enhance their subsequent visual discrimination. This suggests a positive influence of the motor system on visual learning. However, existing studies have emphasized the dominant hand, which is superiorly dexterous in fine-motor movements. This near-exclusive focus prompts the inquiry of whether the observed perceptual facilitation is a general characteristic of the motor system, or specific to pathways controlling the skilled over-trained dominant hand. Furthermore, the mechanistic underpinning of visual facilitation from graphomotor training (i.e., the individual contribution of motor activity, temporal evolution of the visual trace, variability of visual output) remain unclear. To address these questions, we assessed visual discrimination capabilities of healthy right-handed participants (N = 60) before and after graphomotor or visual training. Contrary to our initial expectation, graphomotor engagement with the non-dominant hand did not yield additional benefits to visual learning beyond those attainable through visual training alone. Moreover, graphomotor training with the non-dominant hand resulted in visual discrimination improvements comparable to those of dominant hand training, despite the inherent differences between hands in motor performance and in the amount of improvement in shape tracing throughout training. We conclude that the motor components of graphomotor activity may not be critical for visual learning of shapes through tracing activity. Instead, our results are in agreement with the symbolic theoretical account, suggesting that basic shape features required for discrimination can be acquired through visual inspection alone, providing a perspective on the improvements observed in prior studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"325-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01628-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that engaging in graphomotor activity for creating graphemes can enhance their subsequent visual discrimination. This suggests a positive influence of the motor system on visual learning. However, existing studies have emphasized the dominant hand, which is superiorly dexterous in fine-motor movements. This near-exclusive focus prompts the inquiry of whether the observed perceptual facilitation is a general characteristic of the motor system, or specific to pathways controlling the skilled over-trained dominant hand. Furthermore, the mechanistic underpinning of visual facilitation from graphomotor training (i.e., the individual contribution of motor activity, temporal evolution of the visual trace, variability of visual output) remain unclear. To address these questions, we assessed visual discrimination capabilities of healthy right-handed participants (N = 60) before and after graphomotor or visual training. Contrary to our initial expectation, graphomotor engagement with the non-dominant hand did not yield additional benefits to visual learning beyond those attainable through visual training alone. Moreover, graphomotor training with the non-dominant hand resulted in visual discrimination improvements comparable to those of dominant hand training, despite the inherent differences between hands in motor performance and in the amount of improvement in shape tracing throughout training. We conclude that the motor components of graphomotor activity may not be critical for visual learning of shapes through tracing activity. Instead, our results are in agreement with the symbolic theoretical account, suggesting that basic shape features required for discrimination can be acquired through visual inspection alone, providing a perspective on the improvements observed in prior studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉系统能从非惯用手学到什么?图形运动参与对视觉辨别的影响。
以往的研究表明,通过图形运动活动来创建字母表,可以增强其后续的视觉辨别能力。这表明运动系统对视觉学习有积极影响。然而,现有的研究强调的是主导手,因为主导手在精细运动中的灵巧性更胜一筹。这种近乎排他性的关注促使人们探究所观察到的知觉促进作用是运动系统的一般特征,还是控制熟练的过度训练的优势手的特定通路。此外,图形运动训练产生的视觉促进的机制基础(即运动活动的个体贡献、视觉轨迹的时间演变、视觉输出的可变性)仍不清楚。为了解决这些问题,我们评估了健康右撇子参与者(N = 60)在图形运动或视觉训练前后的视觉辨别能力。与我们最初的预期相反,使用非惯用手进行图形运动训练并没有给视觉学习带来额外的益处,而仅通过视觉训练则可以获得额外的益处。此外,尽管在整个训练过程中双手的运动表现和形状追踪能力的提高存在固有差异,但使用非惯用手进行图形运动训练所带来的视觉辨别能力提高与惯用手训练所带来的提高相当。我们的结论是,图形运动活动的运动成分对于通过描图活动进行图形视觉学习可能并不重要。相反,我们的结果与符号理论的观点一致,表明辨别所需的基本形状特征可以仅通过视觉检查获得,这为先前研究中观察到的改进提供了一个视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Examining the semantic relatedness effect on working memory with ad hoc categories. Expecting the unexpected: Examining the interplay between real-world knowledge and contextual cues during language comprehension. Temporal attention modulates distraction resistance of visual working memory representations. The impact of cross-language co-activation of cognates on bilingual performance on the reading span task. Does expecting external memory support cost recognition memory?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1