Bouncing back from emotional ups and downs: insights in emotional recovery using survival analyses of burst ESM data.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1080/02699931.2024.2423706
Marieke J Schreuder, Sigert Ariens, Ginette Lafit, Eva Ceulemans
{"title":"Bouncing back from emotional ups and downs: insights in emotional recovery using survival analyses of burst ESM data.","authors":"Marieke J Schreuder, Sigert Ariens, Ginette Lafit, Eva Ceulemans","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2423706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many experience sampling (ESM) studies suggested that high resilience is reflected by quickly recovering one's emotional baseline. However, former studies relied on coarse data and did not look into differential recovery from emotional ups and downs. This preregistered proof-of-concept study therefore used high-resolution data collected in 2022 to compute emotional recovery after high levels of positive versus negative emotions. Adults (<i>N</i> = 68) participated in a three-week ESM study with eight assessments per day, complemented by short-spaced burst assessments. Resilience was assessed at baseline (trait-level; TR) and daily (day-level; DR). Multilevel survival analyses showed that high DR predicted faster returns from negative emotions, but also delayed returns following positive emotions (exp(<i>β</i>) = 1.32, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Instead, TR did not relate to emotional recovery (exp(<i>β</i>) = 0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.067). These findings were generally robust across different sensitivity analyses. This illustrates how innovative ESM designs combined with time-to-event analyses may further our insight in emotional recovery and the timescale at which it unfolds.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2423706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many experience sampling (ESM) studies suggested that high resilience is reflected by quickly recovering one's emotional baseline. However, former studies relied on coarse data and did not look into differential recovery from emotional ups and downs. This preregistered proof-of-concept study therefore used high-resolution data collected in 2022 to compute emotional recovery after high levels of positive versus negative emotions. Adults (N = 68) participated in a three-week ESM study with eight assessments per day, complemented by short-spaced burst assessments. Resilience was assessed at baseline (trait-level; TR) and daily (day-level; DR). Multilevel survival analyses showed that high DR predicted faster returns from negative emotions, but also delayed returns following positive emotions (exp(β) = 1.32, p = 0.006). Instead, TR did not relate to emotional recovery (exp(β) = 0.85, p = 0.067). These findings were generally robust across different sensitivity analyses. This illustrates how innovative ESM designs combined with time-to-event analyses may further our insight in emotional recovery and the timescale at which it unfolds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从情绪起伏中反弹:利用突发 ESM 数据生存分析法了解情绪恢复情况。
许多经验取样(ESM)研究表明,快速恢复一个人的情绪基线反映了高复原力。然而,以前的研究依赖于粗略的数据,并没有研究情绪起伏的不同恢复情况。因此,这项预先注册的概念验证研究使用了 2022 年收集的高分辨率数据来计算高水平积极情绪和消极情绪后的情绪恢复情况。成人(68 人)参加了为期三周的 ESM 研究,每天进行八次评估,并辅以短时突发评估。复原力在基线(特质水平;TR)和每日(日水平;DR)进行评估。多层次生存分析表明,高DR预示着消极情绪恢复更快,但也预示着积极情绪恢复延迟(exp(β) = 1.32, p = 0.006)。相反,TR 与情绪恢复无关(exp(β) = 0.85, p = 0.067)。这些结果在不同的敏感性分析中总体上是稳健的。这说明创新性的 ESM 设计与时间到事件分析相结合,可以进一步加深我们对情绪恢复及其发展时间尺度的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Parenthood status and plasma oxytocin levels predict specific emotion perception abilities. Emotion specificity, coherence, and cultural variation in conceptualizations of positive emotions: a study of body sensations and emotion recognition. Stimulus processing bias in anxiety-related fear generalisation: drift-diffusion modelling and subgroups differences. The appraisal patterns and response types of enthusiasm: a comparison with joy and hope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1