Midline Catheter-Associated Thrombosis (MCAT): Does Tip Location in the Axillary Vein Increase Risk?

IF 2.9 Q1 NURSING Journal of Infusion Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1097/NAN.0000000000000558
Max S Schechter, Sarah W Baron, Arash Gohari, William N Southern, Benjamin T Galen
{"title":"Midline Catheter-Associated Thrombosis (MCAT): Does Tip Location in the Axillary Vein Increase Risk?","authors":"Max S Schechter, Sarah W Baron, Arash Gohari, William N Southern, Benjamin T Galen","doi":"10.1097/NAN.0000000000000558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Midline catheters, used for short- and intermediate-term venous access, are recommended to be placed with the tip in an upper arm vein rather than more proximally, in the axillary vein. Despite guidelines recommending against proximal location of the midline catheter tip, the impact of midline catheter tip location on midline catheter-associated thrombosis (MCAT) risk is unclear. Using a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who not only had a midline catheter but also had a chest x-ray and venous duplex performed, the authors evaluated whether axillary vein tip location increased the risk of MCAT. Of the 41 midline catheters with tips located in an arm vein, 17 (41.5%) resulted in a thrombus versus 7 (38.9%) of the 18 midline catheters with tips located in the axillary vein. When compared to midline catheter tips located in an arm vein, midline catheter tips located in the axillary vein were not significantly more likely to result in MCAT in unadjusted analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.29-2.79], P = .85) or adjusted analysis (OR = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.18-2.12], P = .45). These findings support emerging evidence that there does not appear to be an increased risk of MCAT in midlines with an axillary vein tip location. The practice of avoiding the axillary vein for midline catheter tip placement should be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":46291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infusion Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Midline catheters, used for short- and intermediate-term venous access, are recommended to be placed with the tip in an upper arm vein rather than more proximally, in the axillary vein. Despite guidelines recommending against proximal location of the midline catheter tip, the impact of midline catheter tip location on midline catheter-associated thrombosis (MCAT) risk is unclear. Using a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who not only had a midline catheter but also had a chest x-ray and venous duplex performed, the authors evaluated whether axillary vein tip location increased the risk of MCAT. Of the 41 midline catheters with tips located in an arm vein, 17 (41.5%) resulted in a thrombus versus 7 (38.9%) of the 18 midline catheters with tips located in the axillary vein. When compared to midline catheter tips located in an arm vein, midline catheter tips located in the axillary vein were not significantly more likely to result in MCAT in unadjusted analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.29-2.79], P = .85) or adjusted analysis (OR = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.18-2.12], P = .45). These findings support emerging evidence that there does not appear to be an increased risk of MCAT in midlines with an axillary vein tip location. The practice of avoiding the axillary vein for midline catheter tip placement should be reconsidered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中线导管相关血栓形成 (MCAT):尖端位于腋静脉是否会增加风险?
中线导管用于短期和中期静脉通路,建议将导管尖端置于上臂静脉,而不是腋静脉的更近端。尽管指南建议不要将中线导管尖端置于近端,但中线导管尖端位置对中线导管相关血栓形成(MCAT)风险的影响尚不清楚。作者利用一个回顾性队列对住院患者进行了评估,这些患者不仅使用了中线导管,还进行了胸部 X 光检查和静脉双折线检查。在41根尖端位于手臂静脉的中线导管中,17根(41.5%)导致血栓形成,而在18根尖端位于腋静脉的中线导管中,7根(38.9%)导致血栓形成。与位于手臂静脉的中线导管尖端相比,位于腋窝静脉的中线导管尖端在未调整分析(比值比 [OR] = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.29-2.79],P = .85)或调整分析(比值比 [OR] = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.18-2.12],P = .45)中导致 MCAT 的可能性并不显著增加。这些研究结果支持新出现的证据,即腋静脉尖位置的中线发生 MCAT 的风险似乎并没有增加。应重新考虑中线导管尖端位置避开腋静脉的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Journal of Infusion Nursing, the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), seeks to promote excellence in infusion nursing by presenting new research, clinical reviews, case studies, and professional development information relevant to the practice of infusion therapy. Articles selected for publication represent the broad scope of the infusion specialty and draw on the expertise of all healthcare providers who participate in the delivery of infusion therapy.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Pumping Infusion-Induced Contamination With Different Syringe Types. An Exemplary Publication. Complications Related to the Securement Device in Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Study. Midline Catheter-Associated Thrombosis (MCAT): Does Tip Location in the Axillary Vein Increase Risk? Parenteral Nutrition Safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1