Inpatient Rehabilitation is Effective for Severe Daily Activity Deficits Related to Chronic Low Back Pain.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.5041/RMMJ.10530
Elena Aidinoff, Sharona Yosef Ayalon, Dianne Michaeli, Ilana Gelernter, Amiram Catz, Vadim Bluvshtein
{"title":"Inpatient Rehabilitation is Effective for Severe Daily Activity Deficits Related to Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Elena Aidinoff, Sharona Yosef Ayalon, Dianne Michaeli, Ilana Gelernter, Amiram Catz, Vadim Bluvshtein","doi":"10.5041/RMMJ.10530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD) is a syndrome that includes pain, disability, emotional impairments, and social problems. The study was conducted to examine the effect of an inpatient rehabilitation program on the performance of everyday life tasks (daily activities), and report on pain in CLBPD patients with primary activities of daily living (ADL) deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, demographic and clinical data were retrieved from records of inpatients admitted consecutively to the program. Scores of the Spinal Pain Independence Measure (SPIM) and of changes in reported pain levels were used to assess improvement in the performance of daily activities and pain reduction. T-tests were used to assess the significance of score changes. Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance were used to assess relationships of SPIM gain and affecting factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine patients were included. Daily task performance improved in 71 patients (71.7%). The SPIM score increased from 48.7 (SD 16.3) at admission to the rehabilitation program to 57.8 (SD 12.5) at discharge (P<0.001). The SPIM score at admission negatively affected SPIM gain (P<0.001). The SPIM gain was significant for admission SPIM scores of 50 or lower (P<0.05), but differences in SPIM scores were not as noticeable for patients with admission SPIM scores above 50. Relief in pain was reported in 59 patients (59.6%) and was not associated with function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, which improved function and provided limited pain relief in inpatients with CLBPD primary ADL deficits, can be effective for the most severe CLBPD cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":46408,"journal":{"name":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD) is a syndrome that includes pain, disability, emotional impairments, and social problems. The study was conducted to examine the effect of an inpatient rehabilitation program on the performance of everyday life tasks (daily activities), and report on pain in CLBPD patients with primary activities of daily living (ADL) deficits.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, demographic and clinical data were retrieved from records of inpatients admitted consecutively to the program. Scores of the Spinal Pain Independence Measure (SPIM) and of changes in reported pain levels were used to assess improvement in the performance of daily activities and pain reduction. T-tests were used to assess the significance of score changes. Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance were used to assess relationships of SPIM gain and affecting factors.

Results: Ninety-nine patients were included. Daily task performance improved in 71 patients (71.7%). The SPIM score increased from 48.7 (SD 16.3) at admission to the rehabilitation program to 57.8 (SD 12.5) at discharge (P<0.001). The SPIM score at admission negatively affected SPIM gain (P<0.001). The SPIM gain was significant for admission SPIM scores of 50 or lower (P<0.05), but differences in SPIM scores were not as noticeable for patients with admission SPIM scores above 50. Relief in pain was reported in 59 patients (59.6%) and was not associated with function.

Conclusions: The multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, which improved function and provided limited pain relief in inpatients with CLBPD primary ADL deficits, can be effective for the most severe CLBPD cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院康复治疗对与慢性腰痛相关的严重日常活动障碍有效。
背景和目的:慢性腰背痛残疾(CLBPD)是一种包括疼痛、残疾、情感障碍和社会问题的综合征。本研究旨在探讨住院康复计划对日常生活任务(日常活动)的影响,并报告有主要日常生活活动(ADL)障碍的慢性腰背痛残疾患者的疼痛情况:在一项回顾性队列研究中,研究人员从该项目连续收治的住院病人的记录中提取了人口统计学和临床数据。脊柱疼痛独立性量表(SPIM)的评分和报告疼痛程度的变化被用来评估日常活动能力的改善和疼痛的减轻。采用 T 检验来评估得分变化的显著性。斯皮尔曼相关性和方差分析用于评估 SPIM 增益与影响因素之间的关系:结果:共纳入 99 名患者。71名患者(71.7%)的日常工作表现有所改善。SPIM评分从入院时的48.7分(标准差为16.3分)上升到出院时的57.8分(标准差为12.5分)(结论:多学科康复计划的实施使患者的日常工作能力得到了改善:多学科康复计划改善了CLBPD住院患者的功能,并在一定程度上缓解了他们的疼痛,对最严重的CLBPD病例是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
IgG4-related Breast Disease: Review of the Literature. Inpatient Rehabilitation is Effective for Severe Daily Activity Deficits Related to Chronic Low Back Pain. Kidnapped But Not Kids: A Case Series of Three Octogenarian Hostages Held in Captivity by Hamas. Myxedema Coma-associated Pancytopenia: A Case Report. The Medical Professional Elimination Program and the Ideology and Motivation of Nazi Physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1