Evaluation of dose and anatomy variability for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy with a new fully integrated CT-linac.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2024.09.005
Fan Zhang, Jing Liu, Mi Zhou, Xutong Li, Lu Yue, Chong Zhao, Zhenyu Qi, Xiaowu Deng, Yinglin Peng, Zhiping Luo
{"title":"Evaluation of dose and anatomy variability for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy with a new fully integrated CT-linac.","authors":"Fan Zhang, Jing Liu, Mi Zhou, Xutong Li, Lu Yue, Chong Zhao, Zhenyu Qi, Xiaowu Deng, Yinglin Peng, Zhiping Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study was to investigate the variability of target volume and parotid gland dose distribution for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and to explore the shifting patterns of parotid gland centroid and neck radius during radiotherapy. Twenty patients with NPC were enrolled. The target volume dose difference between planning dose and recalculated dose on weekly CT was analyzed. The recalculated doses on every weekly CT were cumulated to assess the difference between delivered dose and planning dose. The relationship of parotid gland centroid deviation with dose was studied, and the shrinking distances of neck radius were calculated for cervical vertebra 1, 2, 3 levels (C1, C2, C3). The ratio of GTVs and CTVs doses on weekly CTs to the doses on planning CT was all above 0.98; the dose of PTVs on weekly CT tended to decrease compared with planning. RMD was defined as the ratio of the mean dose of the left and right parotid glands (L-PG, R-PG) to the planning mean dose. The fitted relationships of RMD and the deviation of centroid (D) for L-PG and R-PG were: RMD=0.37*D+0.98 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.62, p < 0.001) and RMD = 0.33*D+0.97 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, p < 0.001), respectively. The order of neck radius shrinking distance at different levels was C1>C2=C3. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the dosimetric variabilities of target volumes, and established linear models of parotid gland dose and its centroid deviation, which provides fractional and full-course dose evaluation during radiotherapy for NPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2024.09.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the variability of target volume and parotid gland dose distribution for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and to explore the shifting patterns of parotid gland centroid and neck radius during radiotherapy. Twenty patients with NPC were enrolled. The target volume dose difference between planning dose and recalculated dose on weekly CT was analyzed. The recalculated doses on every weekly CT were cumulated to assess the difference between delivered dose and planning dose. The relationship of parotid gland centroid deviation with dose was studied, and the shrinking distances of neck radius were calculated for cervical vertebra 1, 2, 3 levels (C1, C2, C3). The ratio of GTVs and CTVs doses on weekly CTs to the doses on planning CT was all above 0.98; the dose of PTVs on weekly CT tended to decrease compared with planning. RMD was defined as the ratio of the mean dose of the left and right parotid glands (L-PG, R-PG) to the planning mean dose. The fitted relationships of RMD and the deviation of centroid (D) for L-PG and R-PG were: RMD=0.37*D+0.98 (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.001) and RMD = 0.33*D+0.97 (R2 = 0.72, p < 0.001), respectively. The order of neck radius shrinking distance at different levels was C1>C2=C3. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the dosimetric variabilities of target volumes, and established linear models of parotid gland dose and its centroid deviation, which provides fractional and full-course dose evaluation during radiotherapy for NPC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型全集成 CT-linac 评估鼻咽癌放射治疗的剂量和解剖变异性。
这项研究的目的是调查鼻咽癌(NPC)靶体积和腮腺剂量分布的可变性,并探索放疗过程中腮腺中心点和颈部半径的移动模式。20名鼻咽癌患者被纳入研究。分析了计划剂量与每周 CT 重新计算剂量之间的靶体积剂量差。将每周 CT 的重新计算剂量累加,以评估投放剂量与计划剂量之间的差异。研究了腮腺中心点偏差与剂量的关系,并计算了颈椎1、2、3级(C1、C2、C3)的颈部桡骨缩小距离。每周 CT 的 GTV 和 CTV 剂量与计划 CT 的剂量之比均在 0.98 以上;每周 CT 的 PTV 剂量与计划相比呈下降趋势。RMD定义为左右腮腺(L-PG、R-PG)的平均剂量与计划平均剂量之比。L-PG 和 R-PG 的 RMD 与中心点偏差(D)的拟合关系为RMD=0.37*D+0.98 (R2 = 0.62, p < 0.001) 和 RMD=0.33*D+0.97 (R2 = 0.72, p < 0.001)。不同水平颈半径收缩距离的顺序为 C1>C2=C3。本研究定量分析了靶体积的剂量变异性,建立了腮腺剂量及其中心点偏差的线性模型,为鼻咽癌放疗过程中的分次和全程剂量评估提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of dose and anatomy variability for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy with a new fully integrated CT-linac. Directed Journal Reading (DJR) Program, Winter 2024 New Members List & Corporate Members List, Winter 2024 Modelling of silicone breast implants for radiotherapy treatment planning. Effects of minimum monitor unit per dynamic control point on intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1