Quality Improvement Initiatives for Pleural Infection Managed with Intrapleural Therapy.

Riham Elmahboubi, Catherine Robitaille, Céline Dupont, Julie Dallaire, Marie Létourneau, Christian Sirois, David Valenti, Anne V Gonzalez, Stéphane Beaudoin
{"title":"Quality Improvement Initiatives for Pleural Infection Managed with Intrapleural Therapy.","authors":"Riham Elmahboubi, Catherine Robitaille, Céline Dupont, Julie Dallaire, Marie Létourneau, Christian Sirois, David Valenti, Anne V Gonzalez, Stéphane Beaudoin","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-223QI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rationale Pleural infection is associated with significant mortality and its management is complex. Little attention has been given to care process metrics such as management delays, pleural drainage practices, and adequacy of intrapleural therapy administration despite their potential impact on outcomes. Audits revealed gaps in those care processes in our institution. Objectives To assess the impact of quality improvement initiatives on pleural effusion management in adults. Methods We performed a retrospective comparison of patients treated with intrapleural therapy for pleural infection at the McGill University Health Centre before (April 2013-April 2016, N=109) and after interventions (June 2020-June 2021, N=44). Interventions included a pleural drainage policy and order set, an intrapleural therapy protocol and pre-printed order, implementation of intrapleural therapy administration by nurses, local pleural infection guideline development, and an online learning module for physicians. Major outcomes (length of stay, mortality, surgical treatment) and care process metrics (management delays, pleural drainage practices, intrapleural therapy administration) were compared between the two periods. Results After implementation of the interventions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were unchanged, but surgical management went from 14% to 0% (p=0,01). Delays in drain insertion and intrapleural therapy initiation were not significantly different. Insertion of drains smaller than 12Fr decreased from 51% to 7% (p<0,001). Drain blockage decreased from 20% to 2% (p=0,004). Additional drain insertions went from 62% to 48% (p=0,12). After interventions, 70% of intrapleural therapy doses were given by nurses, the intrapleural therapy protocol was more often adequately followed, less doses were missed, and less extended therapy was prescribed. Complications related to drain insertion and intrapleural therapy were similar between the two periods. Conclusions Following the implementation of multifaceted quality improvement interventions for pleural infection including involvement of nurses in pleural drain flushing and intrapleural therapy, improvements were observed in intrapleural therapy administration, chest drainage practices, and need for surgery. However, length of stay, mortality, and management delays were unchanged.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-223QI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale Pleural infection is associated with significant mortality and its management is complex. Little attention has been given to care process metrics such as management delays, pleural drainage practices, and adequacy of intrapleural therapy administration despite their potential impact on outcomes. Audits revealed gaps in those care processes in our institution. Objectives To assess the impact of quality improvement initiatives on pleural effusion management in adults. Methods We performed a retrospective comparison of patients treated with intrapleural therapy for pleural infection at the McGill University Health Centre before (April 2013-April 2016, N=109) and after interventions (June 2020-June 2021, N=44). Interventions included a pleural drainage policy and order set, an intrapleural therapy protocol and pre-printed order, implementation of intrapleural therapy administration by nurses, local pleural infection guideline development, and an online learning module for physicians. Major outcomes (length of stay, mortality, surgical treatment) and care process metrics (management delays, pleural drainage practices, intrapleural therapy administration) were compared between the two periods. Results After implementation of the interventions, in-hospital mortality and length of stay were unchanged, but surgical management went from 14% to 0% (p=0,01). Delays in drain insertion and intrapleural therapy initiation were not significantly different. Insertion of drains smaller than 12Fr decreased from 51% to 7% (p<0,001). Drain blockage decreased from 20% to 2% (p=0,004). Additional drain insertions went from 62% to 48% (p=0,12). After interventions, 70% of intrapleural therapy doses were given by nurses, the intrapleural therapy protocol was more often adequately followed, less doses were missed, and less extended therapy was prescribed. Complications related to drain insertion and intrapleural therapy were similar between the two periods. Conclusions Following the implementation of multifaceted quality improvement interventions for pleural infection including involvement of nurses in pleural drain flushing and intrapleural therapy, improvements were observed in intrapleural therapy administration, chest drainage practices, and need for surgery. However, length of stay, mortality, and management delays were unchanged.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸膜腔内治疗胸膜感染的质量改进措施。
理论依据 胸膜感染会导致大量死亡,其管理也十分复杂。尽管管理延误、胸膜引流术和胸膜腔内给药的充分性等护理流程指标对治疗效果有潜在影响,但却很少受到关注。审计结果显示,我院在这些护理流程方面存在差距。目的 评估质量改进措施对成人胸腔积液管理的影响。方法 我们对麦吉尔大学健康中心因胸膜感染而接受胸腔内治疗的患者在干预前(2013 年 4 月至 2016 年 4 月,N=109)和干预后(2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月,N=44)进行了回顾性比较。干预措施包括胸腔引流政策和医嘱集、胸膜腔内治疗方案和预印医嘱、由护士实施胸膜腔内治疗、制定当地胸膜感染指南以及为医生提供在线学习模块。对两个时期的主要结果(住院时间、死亡率、手术治疗)和护理流程指标(管理延误、胸膜引流术、胸膜内治疗管理)进行了比较。结果 实施干预措施后,院内死亡率和住院时间保持不变,但手术治疗从 14% 降至 0%(P=0,01)。引流管插入和胸腔内治疗启动的延迟没有显著差异。小于12Fr的引流管插入率从51%降至7%(P=0.01
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Airway Remodeling in Cystic Fibrosis Is Heterogeneous. County Level Social Determinates of Health and Correlation with COPD Prevalence in the US. Lest a Smoky Haze of Doubt Suffocate Progress Towards Better Pulse Oximeters. Lung Function Recovery from Pulmonary Exacerbations Treated with Oral Antibiotics in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Trends in the Treatment of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1