Persistence of training-induced visual improvements after occipital stroke.

Hanna E Willis, Berkeley Farenthold, Rebecca S Millington-Truby, Rebecca Willis, Lucy Starling, Matthew Cavanaugh, Marco Tamietto, Krystel Huxlin, Holly Bridge
{"title":"Persistence of training-induced visual improvements after occipital stroke.","authors":"Hanna E Willis, Berkeley Farenthold, Rebecca S Millington-Truby, Rebecca Willis, Lucy Starling, Matthew Cavanaugh, Marco Tamietto, Krystel Huxlin, Holly Bridge","doi":"10.1101/2024.10.24.24316036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Damage to the primary visual cortex causes homonymous visual impairments that appear to benefit from visual discrimination training. However, whether improvements persist without continued training remains to be determined and was the focus of the present study. After a baseline assessment visit, 20 participants trained twice daily in their blind-field for a minimum of six months (median=155 sessions), using a motion discrimination and integration task. At the end of training, a return study visit was used to assess recovery. Three months later, 14 of the participants returned for a third study visit to assess persistence of recovery. At each study visit, motion discrimination and integration thresholds, Humphrey visual fields, and structural MRI scans were collected. Immediately after training, all but four participants showed improvements in the trained discrimination task, and shrinkage of the perimetrically-defined visual defect. While these gains were sustained in seven out of eleven participants who improved with training, four participants lost their improvement in motion discrimination thresholds at the follow-up visit. Persistence of recovery was not related to age, time since lesion, number of training sessions performed, proportion of V1 damaged, deficit size, or optic tract degeneration measured from structural MRI scans. The present findings underscore the potential of extended visual training to induce long-term improvements in stroke-induced vision loss. However, they also highlight the need for further investigations to better understand the mechanisms driving recovery, its persistence post-training, and especially heterogeneity among participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.24316036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Damage to the primary visual cortex causes homonymous visual impairments that appear to benefit from visual discrimination training. However, whether improvements persist without continued training remains to be determined and was the focus of the present study. After a baseline assessment visit, 20 participants trained twice daily in their blind-field for a minimum of six months (median=155 sessions), using a motion discrimination and integration task. At the end of training, a return study visit was used to assess recovery. Three months later, 14 of the participants returned for a third study visit to assess persistence of recovery. At each study visit, motion discrimination and integration thresholds, Humphrey visual fields, and structural MRI scans were collected. Immediately after training, all but four participants showed improvements in the trained discrimination task, and shrinkage of the perimetrically-defined visual defect. While these gains were sustained in seven out of eleven participants who improved with training, four participants lost their improvement in motion discrimination thresholds at the follow-up visit. Persistence of recovery was not related to age, time since lesion, number of training sessions performed, proportion of V1 damaged, deficit size, or optic tract degeneration measured from structural MRI scans. The present findings underscore the potential of extended visual training to induce long-term improvements in stroke-induced vision loss. However, they also highlight the need for further investigations to better understand the mechanisms driving recovery, its persistence post-training, and especially heterogeneity among participants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枕叶中风后,由训练引起的视觉改善仍在持续。
初级视觉皮层受损会导致同名视觉障碍,而视觉辨别训练似乎会使同名视觉障碍患者受益。然而,如果不继续训练,这种改善是否会持续仍有待确定,这也是本研究的重点。在基线评估访问后,20 名参与者每天在盲区进行两次训练,持续至少 6 个月(中位数=155 次),使用运动分辨和整合任务。训练结束后,进行回访以评估恢复情况。三个月后,其中 14 名参与者再次进行了第三次回访,以评估恢复的持续性。在每次回访时,都会收集运动辨别和整合阈值、汉弗莱视野以及结构性核磁共振成像扫描结果。训练结束后,除四名参与者外,其他所有参与者在训练辨别任务中均有所改善,周边界定的视觉缺陷也有所缩小。在 11 名通过训练获得进步的参与者中,有 7 名参与者的进步得以持续,但有 4 名参与者的运动辨别阈值在随访时没有得到改善。恢复的持续性与年龄、病变发生时间、训练次数、V1受损比例、缺损大小或核磁共振成像结构扫描测得的视束变性无关。本研究结果强调了扩展视觉训练在长期改善中风引起的视力丧失方面的潜力。然而,这些研究也强调了进一步研究的必要性,以更好地了解驱动恢复的机制、训练后的持续性,尤其是参与者之间的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opioids Diminish the Placebo Antidepressant Response: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Ketamine Trial. Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon. Prediction of Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults from Preoperative Cognition and Occipital Alpha Power from Resting-State Electroencephalogram. Reduced Cortical Excitability is Associated with Cognitive Symptoms in Concussed Adolescent Football Players. Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor BHLHE22 monoallelic and biallelic variants cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with agenesis of the corpus callosum, intellectual disability, tone and movement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1