Caesarean section scar: Histological analysis on hysterectomy specimen. A pilot study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.048
Constance Maudot , Elodie Debras , Astrid Laurent-Bellue , Margot Dupeux , Suzanne Chartier , Sophie Prevost , Victor Beaucoté , Pascale Chavatte-Palmer , Perrine Goussault Capmas
{"title":"Caesarean section scar: Histological analysis on hysterectomy specimen. A pilot study","authors":"Constance Maudot ,&nbsp;Elodie Debras ,&nbsp;Astrid Laurent-Bellue ,&nbsp;Margot Dupeux ,&nbsp;Suzanne Chartier ,&nbsp;Sophie Prevost ,&nbsp;Victor Beaucoté ,&nbsp;Pascale Chavatte-Palmer ,&nbsp;Perrine Goussault Capmas","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In recent years, caesarean section (CS) rate has risen worldwide. Complications associated with CS scars have risen too, such as scar dehiscences and uterine ruptures. Uterine healing is a complex phenomenon still poorly understood. The aim of this study is to carry out a comparative histological analysis of healthy and scarred uterus.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Women who underwent hysterectomy for benign pathology were included prospectively and divided into two groups: previous CS (group 1) versus control (group 2). Hysterectomy specimen were analyzed histologically and immunohistochemically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty women were included: 30 women per group. In group 1, only 19 women could be analyzed. Median total thickness at the thinnest site of the scar is significantly thinner (4.34 mm; IQR [2.76–9.45]) than that of adjacent healthy isthmus (12.70 mm; IQR [10.45–14.95]) (p &lt; 0.001). It is also thinner than in group 2 (13.45 mm; IQR [11.03–16.90]) (p &lt; 0.001). Median myometrial thickness within the scar in group 1 was also thinner (1.14 mm; IQR [0.30–2.69]) than that of the adjacent healthy isthmus (8.90 mm; IQR [8.18–10.08]) (p &lt; 0.001) and that in group 2 (10.00 mm; IQR [8.38–13.35]) (p &lt; 0.001). There was a significant increase in fibrosis in the scar (55.01 %; IQR [35.71–63.46]) compared with adjacent tissue (17.41 %; IQR [15.08–24.78]) (p &lt; 0.001) and with healthy uterus (33.91 %; IQR [18.93–46.53]) (p = 0.006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In uterus with previous CS scar, total thickness of the wall and thickness of the myometrium are reduced and proportion of fibrosis is significantly increased. This study shows that the thickness of the wall remains reduced in scarred uterus, even very long after CS. Further studies are currently in progress to understand its pathophysiology within the uterus using animal models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 236-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In recent years, caesarean section (CS) rate has risen worldwide. Complications associated with CS scars have risen too, such as scar dehiscences and uterine ruptures. Uterine healing is a complex phenomenon still poorly understood. The aim of this study is to carry out a comparative histological analysis of healthy and scarred uterus.

Material and methods

Women who underwent hysterectomy for benign pathology were included prospectively and divided into two groups: previous CS (group 1) versus control (group 2). Hysterectomy specimen were analyzed histologically and immunohistochemically.

Results

Sixty women were included: 30 women per group. In group 1, only 19 women could be analyzed. Median total thickness at the thinnest site of the scar is significantly thinner (4.34 mm; IQR [2.76–9.45]) than that of adjacent healthy isthmus (12.70 mm; IQR [10.45–14.95]) (p < 0.001). It is also thinner than in group 2 (13.45 mm; IQR [11.03–16.90]) (p < 0.001). Median myometrial thickness within the scar in group 1 was also thinner (1.14 mm; IQR [0.30–2.69]) than that of the adjacent healthy isthmus (8.90 mm; IQR [8.18–10.08]) (p < 0.001) and that in group 2 (10.00 mm; IQR [8.38–13.35]) (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in fibrosis in the scar (55.01 %; IQR [35.71–63.46]) compared with adjacent tissue (17.41 %; IQR [15.08–24.78]) (p < 0.001) and with healthy uterus (33.91 %; IQR [18.93–46.53]) (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

In uterus with previous CS scar, total thickness of the wall and thickness of the myometrium are reduced and proportion of fibrosis is significantly increased. This study shows that the thickness of the wall remains reduced in scarred uterus, even very long after CS. Further studies are currently in progress to understand its pathophysiology within the uterus using animal models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖腹产疤痕:子宫切除术标本的组织学分析。试点研究
导言近年来,剖腹产(CS)率在全球范围内不断上升。与剖腹产疤痕相关的并发症也在增加,如疤痕裂开和子宫破裂。子宫愈合是一个复杂的现象,人们对它的了解还很少。本研究旨在对健康子宫和疤痕子宫进行组织学对比分析。材料和方法前瞻性地纳入了因良性病变而接受子宫切除术的女性,并将其分为两组:既往 CS(第 1 组)和对照组(第 2 组)。对子宫切除标本进行组织学和免疫组化分析:每组 30 人。在第 1 组中,只有 19 名妇女可以进行分析。疤痕最薄处的中位总厚度(4.34 毫米;IQR [2.76-9.45])明显薄于邻近的健康峡部(12.70 毫米;IQR [10.45-14.95])(p <0.001)。它也比第 2 组(13.45 毫米;IQR [11.03-16.90])薄(p <0.001)。与邻近健康峡部(8.90 毫米;IQR [8.18-10.08])(p <0.001)和第 2 组(10.00 毫米;IQR [8.38-13.35])(p <0.001)相比,第 1 组瘢痕内子宫肌层厚度中值(1.14 毫米;IQR [0.30-2.69])也较薄。与邻近组织(17.41%;IQR [15.08-24.78])(p < 0.001)和健康子宫(33.91%;IQR [18.93-46.53])(p = 0.006)相比,瘢痕处的纤维化程度明显增加(55.01%;IQR [35.71-63.46])。这项研究表明,即使在 CS 后很长时间,瘢痕子宫壁的厚度仍然会减少。目前正在利用动物模型开展进一步研究,以了解其在子宫内的病理生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Maternal and perinatal outcomes following code red cesarean delivery performed among hospitals with different level of care. Case-control study of clotting differences using ROTEM testing in pregnant patients with early vaginal bleeding. Corrigendum to "Mode of delivery predicts postpartum maternal leukocyte telomere length" [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 300 (2024) 224-229]. Corrigendum to “Recombinant-Luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GnRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 43–48] Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1