Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105683
{"title":"Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chest pain is a common symptom that presents to the emergency department (ED), and its causes range from minor illnesses to serious diseases such as acute coronary syndrome. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for the efficient management and treatment of these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to expand on a model previously developed by the Chi Mei Medical Group (CMMG) Emergency Department in 2020 to predict adverse cardiac events in patients with chest pain. The main goal is to evaluate the accuracy and generalizability of the model through external validation using data from other hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The initial model for this study was developed using data from three CMMG-affiliated hospitals in southern Taiwan. We utilized four supervised machine learning algorithms, namely random forest, logistic regression, support-vector clustering, and K-nearest neighbor, to predict the risk of acute myocardial infarction within a one month for emergency chest pain patients. The study used the model with the best area under the curve (AUC), recall and precision for external validation. The external validated data source was data collected from three hospitals associated with Taipei Medical University (TMU) in northern Taiwan. <strong>Results:</strong> The original best model constructed by CMMG exhibited an AUC of 0.822, an accuracy of 0.740, a recall of 0.741, a precision of 0.566, a specificity of 0.740, and an NPV of 0.861. Subsequently, during the external validation phase, CMMG’s top-performing model demonstrated acceptable validation result with TMU’s data, achieving an AUC of 0.63, an accuracy of 0.661, a recall of 0.593, a precision of 0.243, a specificity of 0.691, and an NPV of 0.900. While the results indicate that the model’s performance varied across different datasets and are not outstanding, the model is still acceptable for clinical application as a preliminary decision-support tool.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the importance of external validation to confirm the applicability of the previously developed predictive model in other hospital settings. Although the model shows potential in assessing chest pain patients in the ED, its broad clinical application requires further validation to ensure it can improve patient outcomes and optimize healthcare resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Chest pain is a common symptom that presents to the emergency department (ED), and its causes range from minor illnesses to serious diseases such as acute coronary syndrome. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for the efficient management and treatment of these patients.

Objective

This study aims to expand on a model previously developed by the Chi Mei Medical Group (CMMG) Emergency Department in 2020 to predict adverse cardiac events in patients with chest pain. The main goal is to evaluate the accuracy and generalizability of the model through external validation using data from other hospitals.

Methods

The initial model for this study was developed using data from three CMMG-affiliated hospitals in southern Taiwan. We utilized four supervised machine learning algorithms, namely random forest, logistic regression, support-vector clustering, and K-nearest neighbor, to predict the risk of acute myocardial infarction within a one month for emergency chest pain patients. The study used the model with the best area under the curve (AUC), recall and precision for external validation. The external validated data source was data collected from three hospitals associated with Taipei Medical University (TMU) in northern Taiwan. Results: The original best model constructed by CMMG exhibited an AUC of 0.822, an accuracy of 0.740, a recall of 0.741, a precision of 0.566, a specificity of 0.740, and an NPV of 0.861. Subsequently, during the external validation phase, CMMG’s top-performing model demonstrated acceptable validation result with TMU’s data, achieving an AUC of 0.63, an accuracy of 0.661, a recall of 0.593, a precision of 0.243, a specificity of 0.691, and an NPV of 0.900. While the results indicate that the model’s performance varied across different datasets and are not outstanding, the model is still acceptable for clinical application as a preliminary decision-support tool.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of external validation to confirm the applicability of the previously developed predictive model in other hospital settings. Although the model shows potential in assessing chest pain patients in the ED, its broad clinical application requires further validation to ensure it can improve patient outcomes and optimize healthcare resource allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊胸痛患者急性心肌梗死风险预测:外部验证研究
背景胸痛是急诊科(ED)常见的症状,其原因从轻微疾病到严重疾病(如急性冠状动脉综合征)不等。本研究旨在扩展奇美医疗集团(CMMG)急诊科于 2020 年开发的预测胸痛患者不良心脏事件的模型。主要目的是通过使用其他医院的数据进行外部验证,评估模型的准确性和可推广性。方法本研究的初始模型是使用奇美医疗集团在台湾南部的三家附属医院的数据开发的。我们使用了四种有监督的机器学习算法,即随机森林、逻辑回归、支持向量聚类和 K 最近邻,来预测急诊胸痛患者在一个月内发生急性心肌梗死的风险。研究采用了曲线下面积(AUC)、召回率和精确度最佳的模型进行外部验证。外部验证数据来源于台湾北部台北医学大学的三家附属医院。结果由 CMMG 构建的原始最佳模型的 AUC 为 0.822,准确度为 0.740,召回率为 0.741,精确度为 0.566,特异性为 0.740,净现值为 0.861。随后,在外部验证阶段,CMMG 表现最出色的模型通过屯门大学的数据获得了可接受的验证结果,AUC 为 0.63,准确率为 0.661,召回率为 0.593,精确度为 0.243,特异性为 0.691,净现值为 0.900。虽然结果表明该模型在不同数据集上的表现各不相同,并不突出,但该模型作为初步的决策支持工具仍可用于临床应用。虽然该模型在评估急诊室胸痛患者方面显示出了潜力,但其广泛的临床应用还需要进一步验证,以确保它能改善患者预后并优化医疗资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Application of the openEHR reference model for PGHD: A case study on the DH-Convener initiative Tracking provenance in clinical data warehouses for quality management Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study Healthcare professionals’ cross-organizational access to electronic health records: A scoping review Cross-modal similar clinical case retrieval using a modular model based on contrastive learning and k-nearest neighbor search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1