Uniaxial compression on 3D-printed load-bearing walls with openings

Chamil Dhanasekara, Ganchai Tanapornraweekit, Somnuk Tangtermsirikul, Passarin Jongvisuttisun, Chalermwut Snguanyat
{"title":"Uniaxial compression on 3D-printed load-bearing walls with openings","authors":"Chamil Dhanasekara,&nbsp;Ganchai Tanapornraweekit,&nbsp;Somnuk Tangtermsirikul,&nbsp;Passarin Jongvisuttisun,&nbsp;Chalermwut Snguanyat","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01149-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Walls with openings, such as doors or windows, are a common feature in building construction. These openings, regardless of their size, are strategically positioned on each floor to fulfill ventilation or other functional needs. This study primarily aimed to investigate the structural performance of 3D-printed walls with door openings under uniaxial loads. The research focused on three types of walls with an opening: unreinforced, reversed U-bar-reinforced, and reversed U-bar with rebar-reinforced walls. All walls were measured 2000 mm in width, 1310 mm in height, and 120 mm in thickness, with an opening size of 1200 mm in width and 1000 mm in height. The study examined the load-vertical deflection behavior and cracking behavior of the tested walls. It was found that reinforcing the walls improved their stiffness and cracking behavior compared to the unreinforced wall. Moreover, it was observed that vertical cracks, along with small stepped diagonal cracks induced by horizontal stress, were prevalent in the tested walls. Both the reversed U-bar with rebar-reinforced and unreinforced 3D-printed walls with an opening exhibited brittle failure, characterized by significant spalling of the 3D-printed mortar layer surfaces on the column part near the opening edge corner. For the wall with only the reversed U-bar-reinforced, the test was stopped due to safety concerns before failure occurred. The reversed U-bar with the rebar-reinforced wall exhibited a lower ultimate load at failure than the unreinforced wall. This reduction in ultimate load is attributed to higher stress concentrations around the grouted regions within the reinforced wall which causes the earlier failures. Additionally, the failure of the reversed U-bar with the rebar-reinforced wall was observed at the location where the grouted core was incompletely filled.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 8","pages":"5835 - 5846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01149-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walls with openings, such as doors or windows, are a common feature in building construction. These openings, regardless of their size, are strategically positioned on each floor to fulfill ventilation or other functional needs. This study primarily aimed to investigate the structural performance of 3D-printed walls with door openings under uniaxial loads. The research focused on three types of walls with an opening: unreinforced, reversed U-bar-reinforced, and reversed U-bar with rebar-reinforced walls. All walls were measured 2000 mm in width, 1310 mm in height, and 120 mm in thickness, with an opening size of 1200 mm in width and 1000 mm in height. The study examined the load-vertical deflection behavior and cracking behavior of the tested walls. It was found that reinforcing the walls improved their stiffness and cracking behavior compared to the unreinforced wall. Moreover, it was observed that vertical cracks, along with small stepped diagonal cracks induced by horizontal stress, were prevalent in the tested walls. Both the reversed U-bar with rebar-reinforced and unreinforced 3D-printed walls with an opening exhibited brittle failure, characterized by significant spalling of the 3D-printed mortar layer surfaces on the column part near the opening edge corner. For the wall with only the reversed U-bar-reinforced, the test was stopped due to safety concerns before failure occurred. The reversed U-bar with the rebar-reinforced wall exhibited a lower ultimate load at failure than the unreinforced wall. This reduction in ultimate load is attributed to higher stress concentrations around the grouted regions within the reinforced wall which causes the earlier failures. Additionally, the failure of the reversed U-bar with the rebar-reinforced wall was observed at the location where the grouted core was incompletely filled.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对带有开口的 3D 打印承重墙进行单轴压缩
带有门窗等开口的墙壁是建筑施工中的常见特征。这些开口,无论大小,都被战略性地安置在每一层,以满足通风或其他功能需求。本研究的主要目的是研究带有门洞的 3D 打印墙在单轴荷载作用下的结构性能。研究主要针对三种带开口的墙体:无加固墙体、反向 U 型钢筋加固墙体和反向 U 型钢筋加固墙体。所有墙体的宽度为 2000 毫米,高度为 1310 毫米,厚度为 120 毫米,开口尺寸为宽度 1200 毫米,高度 1000 毫米。研究考察了测试墙体的荷载垂直变形行为和开裂行为。研究发现,与未加固的墙体相比,加固墙体可改善其刚度和开裂行为。此外,还观察到测试墙体普遍存在垂直裂缝,以及由水平应力引起的小阶梯状对角裂缝。带螺纹钢筋的反向 U 型钢筋墙和未加固的带开口的三维打印墙均表现出脆性破坏,其特点是靠近开口边角的柱子部分的三维打印砂浆层表面严重剥落。对于只有反向 U 型杆加固的墙体,出于安全考虑,试验在发生故障前就停止了。与未加固的墙体相比,加固了螺纹钢筋的反向 U 型杆在破坏时表现出较低的极限荷载。极限荷载降低的原因是加固墙体中灌浆区域周围的应力集中度较高,从而导致了较早的破坏。此外,带有钢筋加固墙体的反向 U 型钢筋的失效位置位于灌浆核心未完全填充的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning approaches to soil-structure interaction under seismic loading: predictive modeling and analysis Studies on soil stabilized hollow blocks using c & d waste Optimizing ventilation system retrofitting: balancing time, cost, and indoor air quality with NSGA-III Sustainability assessment of sheet pile materials: concrete vs steel in retaining wall construction Predictive modeling for concrete properties under variable curing conditions using advanced machine learning approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1