Outcomes of Tamoxifen Treatment Alone in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Who Refused Surgery

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1155/2024/1805803
Youngji Kwak, Jai Min Ryu, Byung Joo Chae, Jonghan Yu, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee
{"title":"Outcomes of Tamoxifen Treatment Alone in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Who Refused Surgery","authors":"Youngji Kwak,&nbsp;Jai Min Ryu,&nbsp;Byung Joo Chae,&nbsp;Jonghan Yu,&nbsp;Seok Won Kim,&nbsp;Seok Jin Nam,&nbsp;Jeong Eon Lee","doi":"10.1155/2024/1805803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> Recent trends involving increased screening have led to broad populations being diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); as a result, many patients have had to receive surgery followed by standard treatment for ADH or DCIS. The common interest in reducing the use of superfluous invasive treatment has led us to question the necessity of surgical treatment for ADH or DCIS patients in a retrospective review. This work is expected to be a particularly useful reference as there have yet to be any studies describing the outcomes of initial treatment with tamoxifen without curative surgery in Korea.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes of 36 patients with DCIS or ADH diagnosis who received initial treatment with tamoxifen between 2013 and 2019 were investigated.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Among 36 patients enrolled, 30 were diagnosed with DCIS and six were diagnosed with ADH. The median age in the included cohort was 47 years old (range, 26–81 years). There was a change in the follow-up strategy including the need for surgery in 13.9% of cases. The median time to surgery in those patients was 32 months (IQR, 17.5–63.5 months). Only one patient had upgraded to a higher nuclear grade, which was a case of ADH upgrading to intermediate DCIS. Three (8.3%) of 36 patients were upstaged to an invasive disease. Of them, two patients were upstaged to microinvasive ductal carcinoma, whereas one patient was diagnosed with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The use of endocrine therapy without surgery could be a potential treatment strategy in patients with DCIS or ADH. Further validation in larger cohorts and in the context of clinical trials is needed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1805803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1805803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Recent trends involving increased screening have led to broad populations being diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); as a result, many patients have had to receive surgery followed by standard treatment for ADH or DCIS. The common interest in reducing the use of superfluous invasive treatment has led us to question the necessity of surgical treatment for ADH or DCIS patients in a retrospective review. This work is expected to be a particularly useful reference as there have yet to be any studies describing the outcomes of initial treatment with tamoxifen without curative surgery in Korea.

Methods: The clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes of 36 patients with DCIS or ADH diagnosis who received initial treatment with tamoxifen between 2013 and 2019 were investigated.

Results: Among 36 patients enrolled, 30 were diagnosed with DCIS and six were diagnosed with ADH. The median age in the included cohort was 47 years old (range, 26–81 years). There was a change in the follow-up strategy including the need for surgery in 13.9% of cases. The median time to surgery in those patients was 32 months (IQR, 17.5–63.5 months). Only one patient had upgraded to a higher nuclear grade, which was a case of ADH upgrading to intermediate DCIS. Three (8.3%) of 36 patients were upstaged to an invasive disease. Of them, two patients were upstaged to microinvasive ductal carcinoma, whereas one patient was diagnosed with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma.

Conclusion: The use of endocrine therapy without surgery could be a potential treatment strategy in patients with DCIS or ADH. Further validation in larger cohorts and in the context of clinical trials is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拒绝手术的原位乳腺管癌或非典型性乳腺管增生患者单用他莫昔芬治疗的结果
目的:近年来,随着筛查工作的不断加强,越来越多的人被诊断出患有非典型乳腺导管增生(ADH)或乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS);因此,许多患者不得不接受手术治疗,然后再接受ADH或DCIS的标准治疗。减少使用多余的侵入性治疗是我们共同的兴趣所在,这促使我们在一项回顾性研究中质疑对 ADH 或 DCIS 患者进行手术治疗的必要性。在韩国,尚未有任何研究描述使用他莫昔芬进行初始治疗而不进行根治性手术的结果,因此这项研究有望成为特别有用的参考资料。 研究方法调查了2013年至2019年期间接受他莫昔芬初始治疗的36例DCIS或ADH患者的临床病理特征和肿瘤学结果。 结果入组的 36 名患者中,30 人被诊断为 DCIS,6 人被诊断为 ADH。入组患者的中位年龄为 47 岁(26-81 岁)。13.9%的病例改变了随访策略,包括需要手术。这些患者的中位手术时间为 32 个月(IQR,17.5-63.5 个月)。只有一名患者的核分级升至更高,即ADH升至中度DCIS。36 例患者中有 3 例(8.3%)升级为浸润性疾病。其中,两名患者升级为微小浸润性导管癌,一名患者被诊断为转移性浸润性导管癌。 结论对于DCIS或ADH患者,使用内分泌治疗而不进行手术可能是一种潜在的治疗策略。需要在更大的群体和临床试验中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of Tamoxifen Treatment Alone in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Who Refused Surgery Biomarkers of Bacterial Translocation and Intestinal Wall Damage in Patients With Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome An Overview of Publications on Extracellular Vesicles in Osteoarthritis from 2012 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Among Hospital Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia Predicting Sepsis-Related Mortality: Pitt Bacteremia Score is Superior to the Charlson Comorbidity Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1