Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/aas.14545
Camilla Gaarsdal Uhrbrand, Damir Salskov Obad, Bente Thoft Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, Kristian Dahl Friesgaard, Lone Nikolajsen
{"title":"Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Camilla Gaarsdal Uhrbrand, Damir Salskov Obad, Bente Thoft Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, Kristian Dahl Friesgaard, Lone Nikolajsen","doi":"10.1111/aas.14545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain management is a challenge after robot-assisted cystectomy (RAC). Methadone has a long duration of action, and we therefore hypothesized that a single dose of intraoperative methadone would reduce postoperative opioid requirements and pain intensity in bladder cancer patients undergoing RAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a blinded randomized controlled clinical trial from July 2020 to August 2023. Patients scheduled to undergo RAC because of bladder cancer were randomized to receive intraoperative methadone (0.15 mg/kg<sup>-1</sup>) or morphine (0.15 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) 1 h before endotracheal extubation. The primary outcome was opioid requirements after 24 h. Secondary outcomes were opioid requirements after 3 h, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, hypoxemia, hypoventilation, time spent in the post-anesthetic care unit, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients were randomized. Data from 99 patients (14 females, 85 males; mean age 69.8 ± 8.9 years) were available for analysis; 52 received methadone and 47 received morphine. Opioid consumption was similar between the methadone group and morphine group at 3 h (median, mg, 45 (IQR 30 to 75) vs. 45 (IQR 15 to 82.5) p = .97) and at 24 h (median, mg, 125 (IQR 75 to 198.5) versus 105 (IQR 72 to 157.5), p = .29). Pain intensity was significantly lower in the morphine group at 48 h compared with the methadone group. Patient satisfaction at 24 h was increased in the methadone group compared with the morphine group (median, (IQR), NRS; 9 (IQR 7 to 10) versus 7 (IQR 4 to 9), p = .020). There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of time spent in the post-anesthetic care unit and the occurrence of opioid-related side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single dose of intraoperative methadone does not reduce postoperative opioid requirements compared with a single dose of morphine in bladder cancer patients undergoing RAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain management is a challenge after robot-assisted cystectomy (RAC). Methadone has a long duration of action, and we therefore hypothesized that a single dose of intraoperative methadone would reduce postoperative opioid requirements and pain intensity in bladder cancer patients undergoing RAC.

Methods: We conducted a blinded randomized controlled clinical trial from July 2020 to August 2023. Patients scheduled to undergo RAC because of bladder cancer were randomized to receive intraoperative methadone (0.15 mg/kg-1) or morphine (0.15 mg kg-1) 1 h before endotracheal extubation. The primary outcome was opioid requirements after 24 h. Secondary outcomes were opioid requirements after 3 h, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, hypoxemia, hypoventilation, time spent in the post-anesthetic care unit, and patient satisfaction.

Results: A total of 114 patients were randomized. Data from 99 patients (14 females, 85 males; mean age 69.8 ± 8.9 years) were available for analysis; 52 received methadone and 47 received morphine. Opioid consumption was similar between the methadone group and morphine group at 3 h (median, mg, 45 (IQR 30 to 75) vs. 45 (IQR 15 to 82.5) p = .97) and at 24 h (median, mg, 125 (IQR 75 to 198.5) versus 105 (IQR 72 to 157.5), p = .29). Pain intensity was significantly lower in the morphine group at 48 h compared with the methadone group. Patient satisfaction at 24 h was increased in the methadone group compared with the morphine group (median, (IQR), NRS; 9 (IQR 7 to 10) versus 7 (IQR 4 to 9), p = .020). There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of time spent in the post-anesthetic care unit and the occurrence of opioid-related side effects.

Conclusion: A single dose of intraoperative methadone does not reduce postoperative opioid requirements compared with a single dose of morphine in bladder cancer patients undergoing RAC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助膀胱切除术术中使用美沙酮对术后阿片类药物需求的影响:随机临床试验。
背景:机器人辅助膀胱切除术(RAC)术后疼痛管理是一项挑战。美沙酮的作用时间较长,因此我们假设术中使用单剂量美沙酮可减少接受机器人辅助膀胱切除术(RAC)的膀胱癌患者术后阿片类药物的需求量和疼痛强度:我们在 2020 年 7 月至 2023 年 8 月期间开展了一项盲法随机对照临床试验。因膀胱癌而计划接受 RAC 的患者在气管插管前 1 小时随机接受术中美沙酮(0.15 毫克/千克-1)或吗啡(0.15 毫克/千克-1)。主要结果是24小时后的阿片类药物需求量,次要结果是3小时后的阿片类药物需求量、休息时和咳嗽时的疼痛强度、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)、镇静、低氧血症、通气不足、在麻醉后护理病房度过的时间以及患者满意度:共有 114 名患者接受了随机治疗。99名患者(14名女性,85名男性;平均年龄69.8±8.9岁)的数据可供分析;52名患者使用美沙酮,47名患者使用吗啡。美沙酮组和吗啡组在 3 小时(中位数,毫克,45(IQR 30 至 75)对 45(IQR 15 至 82.5),p = 0.97)和 24 小时(中位数,毫克,125(IQR 75 至 198.5)对 105(IQR 72 至 157.5),p = 0.29)的阿片类药物消耗量相似。与美沙酮组相比,吗啡组在 48 小时后的疼痛强度明显降低。与吗啡组相比,美沙酮组患者在 24 小时后的满意度有所提高(NRS 中位数(IQR);9(IQR 7 至 10)对 7(IQR 4 至 9),p = .020)。各治疗组在麻醉后护理病房所花费的时间和阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率方面没有差异:结论:与单剂量吗啡相比,术中使用单剂量美沙酮并不能减少接受RAC手术的膀胱癌患者术后对阿片类药物的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial. Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review. Time from pain assessment to opioid treatment in the Danish emergency departments-A multicenter cohort study. Viscoelastic testing of fibrinolytic capacity in acutely infected critically ill patients: Protocol for a scoping review. Does cytochrome 2D6 genotype affect the analgesic efficacy of codeine after ambulatory surgery? Prospective trial in 987 adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1