Real World Outcomes in Patients With Recurrent, Advanced, or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.10.008
A. Pawsey , P. Mahalingam , N. Senthivel , A. Ramessur , E. Turnbull , S. Usman , R. Browne , A. Patel , A. Stewart , L. Tookman , N. Counsell , R. Miller , S. Nicum , G. Eminowicz
{"title":"Real World Outcomes in Patients With Recurrent, Advanced, or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab","authors":"A. Pawsey ,&nbsp;P. Mahalingam ,&nbsp;N. Senthivel ,&nbsp;A. Ramessur ,&nbsp;E. Turnbull ,&nbsp;S. Usman ,&nbsp;R. Browne ,&nbsp;A. Patel ,&nbsp;A. Stewart ,&nbsp;L. Tookman ,&nbsp;N. Counsell ,&nbsp;R. Miller ,&nbsp;S. Nicum ,&nbsp;G. Eminowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Patients with endometrial cancer who progress following first line therapy have improved survival outcomes with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib (pem/len) compared with standard of care chemotherapy, as demonstrated in KEYNOTE-775. This was in a group of trial patients with good performance status and excluded those with carcinosarcoma histology. In KEYNOTE-775 pem/len was associated with significant toxicity, leading to dose reductions, treatment cessation, and patient morbidity. We set out to assess the tolerability, toxicity and outcomes following pem/len for patients with recurrent, advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer in a real-world setting.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>UK centres treating patients with pem/len for advanced endometrial cancer within the compassionate access programme were approached. Retrospective data were analysed for those treated between May 2022 and June 2023. Data on patient demographics, treatment, toxicity and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Toxicity and tolerability were compared in those over and under the age of 70.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven centres returned data for 70 patients. Median age of patients was 68.5 years (range 45–85) with a performance status of 0–1 in 77.1% and of 2 in 22.9%. Histological subtypes included serous (34.3%), endometrioid (32.9%), carcinosarcoma (14.3%), clear cell (7.1%), mixed (2.9%) and other (8.6%). Grade ≥3 toxicity was reported in 55.7% with any-grade toxicity observed in 85.7%. In those aged ≥70 years (n = 30) the rate of grade ≥3 toxicity was 60.0%. Rates of dose reduction of lenvatinib were 64.3%, and toxicity-related treatment interruption was 45.7%. The 6-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 54.0% (95%CI: 39.0–66.8) and 70.1% (95%CI:56.5–80.1) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This real-world, observational study of pem/len showed comparable tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes to previously reported clinical trial data. Our cohort included patients with a poorer PS and a broader range of histological subtypes including carcinosarcoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 103656"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524004217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Patients with endometrial cancer who progress following first line therapy have improved survival outcomes with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib (pem/len) compared with standard of care chemotherapy, as demonstrated in KEYNOTE-775. This was in a group of trial patients with good performance status and excluded those with carcinosarcoma histology. In KEYNOTE-775 pem/len was associated with significant toxicity, leading to dose reductions, treatment cessation, and patient morbidity. We set out to assess the tolerability, toxicity and outcomes following pem/len for patients with recurrent, advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer in a real-world setting.

Materials and methods

UK centres treating patients with pem/len for advanced endometrial cancer within the compassionate access programme were approached. Retrospective data were analysed for those treated between May 2022 and June 2023. Data on patient demographics, treatment, toxicity and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Toxicity and tolerability were compared in those over and under the age of 70.

Results

Seven centres returned data for 70 patients. Median age of patients was 68.5 years (range 45–85) with a performance status of 0–1 in 77.1% and of 2 in 22.9%. Histological subtypes included serous (34.3%), endometrioid (32.9%), carcinosarcoma (14.3%), clear cell (7.1%), mixed (2.9%) and other (8.6%). Grade ≥3 toxicity was reported in 55.7% with any-grade toxicity observed in 85.7%. In those aged ≥70 years (n = 30) the rate of grade ≥3 toxicity was 60.0%. Rates of dose reduction of lenvatinib were 64.3%, and toxicity-related treatment interruption was 45.7%. The 6-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 54.0% (95%CI: 39.0–66.8) and 70.1% (95%CI:56.5–80.1) respectively.

Conclusion

This real-world, observational study of pem/len showed comparable tolerability, toxicity, and outcomes to previously reported clinical trial data. Our cohort included patients with a poorer PS and a broader range of histological subtypes including carcinosarcoma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用伦伐替尼加 Pembrolizumab 治疗复发性、晚期或转移性子宫内膜癌患者的实际疗效。
目的:KEYNOTE-775试验表明,与标准疗法化疗相比,使用pembrolizumab和lenvatinib(pem/len)治疗一线治疗后病情进展的子宫内膜癌患者的生存率更高。这是在一组表现状况良好的试验患者中进行的,并排除了组织学为癌肉瘤的患者。在 KEYNOTE-775 试验中,pem/len 具有明显的毒性,导致剂量减少、治疗停止和患者发病。我们试图在真实世界中评估复发性、晚期或转移性子宫内膜癌患者接受 pem/len 治疗后的耐受性、毒性和疗效:我们联系了英国的一些中心,这些中心在同情性准入计划范围内使用培美/伦治疗晚期子宫内膜癌患者。对 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 6 月期间接受治疗的患者的回顾性数据进行了分析。从医疗记录中提取了有关患者人口统计学、治疗、毒性和结果的数据。对 70 岁以上和 70 岁以下患者的毒性和耐受性进行了比较:七个中心共提供了 70 名患者的数据。患者的中位年龄为 68.5 岁(45-85 岁不等),77.1% 的患者表现为 0-1,22.9% 的患者表现为 2。组织学亚型包括浆液性(34.3%)、子宫内膜样(32.9%)、癌肉瘤(14.3%)、透明细胞(7.1%)、混合型(2.9%)和其他(8.6%)。55.7%的患者出现≥3级毒性,85.7%的患者出现任何级别的毒性。在年龄≥70岁的人群中(n = 30),≥3级毒性发生率为60.0%。来伐替尼剂量减少率为64.3%,与毒性相关的治疗中断率为45.7%。6个月无进展生存率和总生存率分别为54.0%(95%CI:39.0-66.8)和70.1%(95%CI:56.5-80.1):这项关于 pem/len 的真实世界观察性研究显示,其耐受性、毒性和结果与之前报告的临床试验数据相当。我们的队列中包括了PS较差的患者和更广泛的组织学亚型,包括癌肉瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Correspondence to the Editor: Performance of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Evaluated on Clinical Oncology Cases Hybrid Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) γδ T Cells for Oral Cancer Therapy: Enhanced Safety and Targeted Efficacy Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Oestrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancers: The Neo-RT Feasibility Study Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Bone-Only Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: On a Quest to Find the Optimum Cohort Reirradiation in Paediatric Tumours of the Central Nervous System: Outcome and Side Effects After Implementing National Guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1