Improvement of fatigue, depression, and processing speed two weeks post Natalizumab infusion in Multiple Sclerosis: No difference between standard and extended interval dosing schedules
Giorgio Leodori , Marco Mancuso , Davide Maccarrone , Matteo Tartaglia , Antonio Ianniello , Viola Baione , Gina Ferrazzano , Leonardo Malimpensa , Daniele Belvisi , Alfredo Berardelli , Carlo Pozzilli , Antonella Conte
{"title":"Improvement of fatigue, depression, and processing speed two weeks post Natalizumab infusion in Multiple Sclerosis: No difference between standard and extended interval dosing schedules","authors":"Giorgio Leodori , Marco Mancuso , Davide Maccarrone , Matteo Tartaglia , Antonio Ianniello , Viola Baione , Gina Ferrazzano , Leonardo Malimpensa , Daniele Belvisi , Alfredo Berardelli , Carlo Pozzilli , Antonella Conte","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fatigue, depression and slow processing speed are debilitating symptoms in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) that significantly impacts on the quality of life. Natalizumab, a disease-modifying treatment, improves clinical symptoms but questions remain about the comparative efficacy between its standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID) schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the impact of short term natalizumab dosing schedules—SID versus EID—on the so called “invisible symptoms”, specifically focusing on symptom exacerbation during the 'wearing-off' phase before infusion and the subsequent relief post-infusion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-two RRMS patients were assessed one week before (T0) and two weeks after pre-and post-natalizumab infusion (T1) for fatigue symptoms using the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire–Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS). Processing speed and depression were measured by the symbol digit modality test (SDMT), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Participants were categorized into either the SID or EID dosing schedules of natalizumab, and their outcomes were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-two patients (21 SID; 21 EID) completed the study. Fatigue severity scales, SDMT, and BDI-II scores improved from T0 to T1. No significant differences in fatigue symptoms were found between the SID and EID groups, whether during the \"wearing-off\" period (T0) or post-infusion (T1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both SID and EID dosing regimens of natalizumab are similarly effective in reducing fatigue symptoms, depression and improving processing speed in individuals with RRMS, with no observed differences during the \"wearing-off\" periods or after re-infusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fatigue, depression and slow processing speed are debilitating symptoms in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) that significantly impacts on the quality of life. Natalizumab, a disease-modifying treatment, improves clinical symptoms but questions remain about the comparative efficacy between its standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID) schedules.
Objective
To examine the impact of short term natalizumab dosing schedules—SID versus EID—on the so called “invisible symptoms”, specifically focusing on symptom exacerbation during the 'wearing-off' phase before infusion and the subsequent relief post-infusion.
Methods
Forty-two RRMS patients were assessed one week before (T0) and two weeks after pre-and post-natalizumab infusion (T1) for fatigue symptoms using the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire–Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS). Processing speed and depression were measured by the symbol digit modality test (SDMT), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Participants were categorized into either the SID or EID dosing schedules of natalizumab, and their outcomes were compared.
Results
Forty-two patients (21 SID; 21 EID) completed the study. Fatigue severity scales, SDMT, and BDI-II scores improved from T0 to T1. No significant differences in fatigue symptoms were found between the SID and EID groups, whether during the "wearing-off" period (T0) or post-infusion (T1).
Conclusions
Both SID and EID dosing regimens of natalizumab are similarly effective in reducing fatigue symptoms, depression and improving processing speed in individuals with RRMS, with no observed differences during the "wearing-off" periods or after re-infusion.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource.
A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.