Root causes behind patient safety incidents in the emergency department and suggestions for improving patient safety - an analysis in a Finnish teaching hospital.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s12873-024-01120-9
Minna Halinen, Hanna Tiirinki, Auvo Rauhala, Sanna Kiili, Tuija Ikonen
{"title":"Root causes behind patient safety incidents in the emergency department and suggestions for improving patient safety - an analysis in a Finnish teaching hospital.","authors":"Minna Halinen, Hanna Tiirinki, Auvo Rauhala, Sanna Kiili, Tuija Ikonen","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01120-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse events occur frequently at emergency departments (ED) because of several risk factors related to varying conditions. It is still unclear, which factors lead to patient safety incident reports. The aim of this study was to explore the root causes behind ED-associated patient safety incidents reported by personnel, and based on the findings, to suggest learning objectives for improving patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study material included incident reports (n = 340) which concerned the ED of a teaching hospital over one year. We used a mixed method combining quantitative descriptive statistics and qualitative research by inductive content analysis and deductive Ishikawa root cause analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most (76.5%) incidents were reported after patient transfer from the ED. Nurses reported 70% of incidents and physicians 7.4%. Of the reports, 40% were related to information flow or management. Incidents were evaluated as no harm (29.4%), mild (46%), moderate (19.7%), and severe (1.2%) harm to the patient. The main consequences for the organization were reputation loss (44.1%) and extra work (38.9%). In the qualitative analysis, nine specific problem groups were found: insufficient introduction, adherence to guidelines and protocols, insufficient human resources, deficient professional skills, medication management deficiencies, incomplete information transfer from the ED, language proficiency, unprofessional behaviour, identification error, and patient-dependent problems. Six organizational themes were identified: medical staff orientation, onboarding and competence requirements; human resources; electronic medical records and information transfer; medication documentation system; interprofessional collaboration; resources for specific patient groups such as geriatric, mental health, and patients with substance abuse disorder. Entirely human factor-related themes could not be defined because their associations with system factors were complex and multifaceted. Individual and organizational learning objectives were addressed, such as adherence to the proper use of instructions and adequate onboarding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>System factors caused most of the patient safety incidents reported concerning ED. The introduction and training of ED -processes is elementary, as is multiprofessional collaboration. More research is needed about teamwork skills, patients with special needs and non-critical patients, and the reporting of severe incidents.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01120-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse events occur frequently at emergency departments (ED) because of several risk factors related to varying conditions. It is still unclear, which factors lead to patient safety incident reports. The aim of this study was to explore the root causes behind ED-associated patient safety incidents reported by personnel, and based on the findings, to suggest learning objectives for improving patient safety.

Methods: The study material included incident reports (n = 340) which concerned the ED of a teaching hospital over one year. We used a mixed method combining quantitative descriptive statistics and qualitative research by inductive content analysis and deductive Ishikawa root cause analysis.

Results: Most (76.5%) incidents were reported after patient transfer from the ED. Nurses reported 70% of incidents and physicians 7.4%. Of the reports, 40% were related to information flow or management. Incidents were evaluated as no harm (29.4%), mild (46%), moderate (19.7%), and severe (1.2%) harm to the patient. The main consequences for the organization were reputation loss (44.1%) and extra work (38.9%). In the qualitative analysis, nine specific problem groups were found: insufficient introduction, adherence to guidelines and protocols, insufficient human resources, deficient professional skills, medication management deficiencies, incomplete information transfer from the ED, language proficiency, unprofessional behaviour, identification error, and patient-dependent problems. Six organizational themes were identified: medical staff orientation, onboarding and competence requirements; human resources; electronic medical records and information transfer; medication documentation system; interprofessional collaboration; resources for specific patient groups such as geriatric, mental health, and patients with substance abuse disorder. Entirely human factor-related themes could not be defined because their associations with system factors were complex and multifaceted. Individual and organizational learning objectives were addressed, such as adherence to the proper use of instructions and adequate onboarding.

Conclusions: System factors caused most of the patient safety incidents reported concerning ED. The introduction and training of ED -processes is elementary, as is multiprofessional collaboration. More research is needed about teamwork skills, patients with special needs and non-critical patients, and the reporting of severe incidents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科患者安全事故背后的根本原因及改善患者安全的建议--芬兰一家教学医院的分析。
背景:急诊科(ED)经常出现不良事件,这是因为与不同情况相关的几个风险因素。目前还不清楚是哪些因素导致了患者安全事件的报告。本研究旨在探讨急诊科人员报告的患者安全事件背后的根本原因,并根据研究结果提出改善患者安全的学习目标:研究材料包括一家教学医院一年来的急诊室事故报告(n = 340)。我们采用了一种混合方法,通过归纳式内容分析和演绎式石川根本原因分析,将定量描述性统计与定性研究相结合:大多数(76.5%)事件是在病人从急诊室转出后报告的。护士报告的事故占 70%,医生报告的事故占 7.4%。在这些报告中,40%与信息流或管理有关。事故对患者造成的伤害分为无伤害(29.4%)、轻微伤害(46%)、中度伤害(19.7%)和严重伤害(1.2%)。对机构造成的主要后果是名誉损失(44.1%)和额外工作(38.9%)。在定性分析中,发现了九类具体问题:介绍不足、不遵守指南和规程、人力资源不足、专业技能不足、药物管理缺陷、来自急诊室的信息传递不完整、语言能力不足、非专业行为、识别错误以及患者依赖性问题。确定了六个组织主题:医务人员的入职培训、上岗培训和能力要求;人力资源;电子病历和信息传输;用药记录系统;跨专业合作;为特定患者群体(如老年病患者、精神疾病患者和药物滥用症患者)提供资源。与人的因素相关的主题无法完全界定,因为它们与系统因素的关联是复杂和多方面的。个人和组织的学习目标得到了解决,如遵守正确的使用说明和充分的入职培训:结论:系统因素导致了大多数与急诊科有关的患者安全事故。急诊室流程的介绍和培训是基础,多专业合作也是如此。需要对团队合作技能、有特殊需求的患者和非危重患者以及严重事故的报告进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1