Developing and testing Advance Choice Document implementation resources for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06213-0
Jonathan Simpson, Abigail Babatunde, Alan Simpson, Steven Gilbert, Alex Ruck Keene, Lucy Stephenson, Kia-Chong Chua, Gareth Owen, Fiona Crowe, Pauline Edwards, Selena Galloway, Megan Fisher, Marcela Schilderman, Anita Bignell, Shubulade Smith, Claire Henderson
{"title":"Developing and testing Advance Choice Document implementation resources for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission.","authors":"Jonathan Simpson, Abigail Babatunde, Alan Simpson, Steven Gilbert, Alex Ruck Keene, Lucy Stephenson, Kia-Chong Chua, Gareth Owen, Fiona Crowe, Pauline Edwards, Selena Galloway, Megan Fisher, Marcela Schilderman, Anita Bignell, Shubulade Smith, Claire Henderson","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06213-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance Choice Documents (ACDs) have been recommended for use in England and Wales based on evidence from trials that show that they can reduce involuntary hospitalisation, which disproportionately affects Black African and Caribbean people. Our aim was therefore to develop and test ACD implementation resources and processes for Black people who have previously been involuntarily hospitalised and the people that support them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resource co-production workshops were held to inform the development of the ACD template and two types of training for all stakeholders, comprising a Recovery College course and simulation training. An ACD facilitator then used the ACD template developed through the workshops to create personalised ACDs with service users and mental health staff over a series of meetings. Interviews were then conducted with service user and staff participants and analysed to document their experience of the process and opinions on ACDs. Other implementation strategies were also employed alongside to support and optimise the creation of ACDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine ACDs were completed and were largely reported as appropriate, acceptable, and feasible to service users and staff. Both reported it being an empowering process that encouraged hope for better future treatment and therefore better wellbeing. Uncertainty was also expressed about the confidence people had that ACDs would be adhered to/honoured, primarily due to staff workload. The information provision training and the skills training were generally considered to be informative by trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The project has developed an ACD creation resource that was reported as agreeable to all stakeholders; however, the generalisability of the findings is limited due to the small sample size. The project also highlights the importance of staff and ACD facilitator capacity and good therapeutic relationships in ACD completion. Further research is needed to determine the adjustments needed for large scale use, including for those under age 18 and those under the care of forensic mental health services; and how to include carers/supporters more in the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"777"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06213-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance Choice Documents (ACDs) have been recommended for use in England and Wales based on evidence from trials that show that they can reduce involuntary hospitalisation, which disproportionately affects Black African and Caribbean people. Our aim was therefore to develop and test ACD implementation resources and processes for Black people who have previously been involuntarily hospitalised and the people that support them.

Methods: Resource co-production workshops were held to inform the development of the ACD template and two types of training for all stakeholders, comprising a Recovery College course and simulation training. An ACD facilitator then used the ACD template developed through the workshops to create personalised ACDs with service users and mental health staff over a series of meetings. Interviews were then conducted with service user and staff participants and analysed to document their experience of the process and opinions on ACDs. Other implementation strategies were also employed alongside to support and optimise the creation of ACDs.

Results: Nine ACDs were completed and were largely reported as appropriate, acceptable, and feasible to service users and staff. Both reported it being an empowering process that encouraged hope for better future treatment and therefore better wellbeing. Uncertainty was also expressed about the confidence people had that ACDs would be adhered to/honoured, primarily due to staff workload. The information provision training and the skills training were generally considered to be informative by trainees.

Conclusions: The project has developed an ACD creation resource that was reported as agreeable to all stakeholders; however, the generalisability of the findings is limited due to the small sample size. The project also highlights the importance of staff and ACD facilitator capacity and good therapeutic relationships in ACD completion. Further research is needed to determine the adjustments needed for large scale use, including for those under age 18 and those under the care of forensic mental health services; and how to include carers/supporters more in the process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为有强制入住精神病院经历的非洲黑人和加勒比人开发和测试 "预先选择文件 "实施资源。
背景:英格兰和威尔士推荐使用预先选择文件(ACDs),其依据是试验证据表明,预先选择文件可以减少非自愿住院,而非自愿住院对非洲黑人和加勒比海黑人的影响尤为严重。因此,我们的目标是为曾经非自愿住院的黑人及其支持者开发并测试 ACD 的实施资源和流程:我们举办了资源共同生产研讨会,为开发 ACD 模板和针对所有利益相关者的两类培训(包括康复学院课程和模拟培训)提供信息。然后,一名 ACD 促进者使用通过研讨会开发的 ACD 模板,在一系列会议上与服务使用者和心理健康工作人员一起创建个性化的 ACD。然后,我们对服务使用者和工作人员进行了访谈,并对访谈内容进行了分析,以记录他们在这一过程中的体验以及对 ACD 的看法。同时还采用了其他实施策略,以支持和优化 ACD 的创建:结果:共完成了九项 ACD,服务使用者和工作人员普遍认为这些 ACD 是适当的、可接受的和可行的。他们都表示,这是一个增强能力的过程,鼓励人们对未来更好的治疗抱有希望,从而获得更好的福祉。也有人表示,主要由于工作人员的工作量问题,他们对是否会坚持/遵守 "ACD "的信心并不确定。受训人员普遍认为信息提供培训和技能培训内容丰富:结论:该项目开发了一种 ACD 创建资源,所有利益相关者都表示同意;但是,由于样本量较小,研究结果的普遍性受到了限制。该项目还强调了工作人员和心理咨询协调员的能力以及良好的治疗关系在完成心理咨询过程中的重要性。还需要进一步的研究来确定大规模使用时所需的调整,包括对那些未满 18 周岁的人和接受法医精神健康服务的人的调整;以及如何让照顾者/支持者更多地参与到这一过程中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of people with schizophrenia on clinical outcome scales and patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study. Self-harm hospitalizations and neighbourhood level material and social deprivation in Canada: an ecological study. The relationship between dyadic coping and post-traumatic growth in breast cancer patients and spouses: based on potential profile analysis. Estimating the link between service-user patient safety perceptions, incidents and subsequent contagion in acute mental health wards. Relationships between empathy, executive functions, and internalizing and externalizing symptoms in early adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1