{"title":"The Distress and Benefits of the Bereaved Family Survey: A Mortality Follow-Back Survey","authors":"Mai Hosokawa RN, PhD , Yoko Nakazawa RN, PhD , Mitsunori Miyashita RN, PhD , Kento Masukawa RN, PhD , Momoka Sato RN , Tatsuya Morita MD , Yasuyiki Okumura PhD , Yoshiyuki Kizawa MD, PhD , Shohei Kawagoe MD , Hiroshi Yamamoto MD, PhD , Emi Takeuchi PhD , Risa Yamazaki MA , Asao Ogawa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (<em>P</em> < 0.001–0.003), 20–39-year-old patients (<em>P</em> < 0.001), female bereaved family members (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Factors related to “benefit” were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (<em>P</em> < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 2","pages":"Pages 152-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392424011102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.
Objectives
To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.
Methods
We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.
Results
Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (P < 0.001–0.003), 20–39-year-old patients (P < 0.001), female bereaved family members (P < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (P < 0.001). Factors related to “benefit” were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (P < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (P < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.