Reducing unnecessary use of intermittent pneumatic compression in intensive care: A before-and-after pilot study with environmental perspective.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.010
Louise Hansell, Anthony Delaney, Maree Milross, Elise Henderson
{"title":"Reducing unnecessary use of intermittent pneumatic compression in intensive care: A before-and-after pilot study with environmental perspective.","authors":"Louise Hansell, Anthony Delaney, Maree Milross, Elise Henderson","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The healthcare sector in Australia has committed to reducing carbon emissions associated with care delivery. Thirty percent of care delivered in the Australian hospital sector is considered low-value care. Intensive care uses chemical prophylaxis to reduce risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Mechanical prophylaxis methods, which include intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), are often used as an adjunct to chemical prophylaxis but can also be used in patients where chemical prophylaxis is contraindicated. Recent literature demonstrates, however, that there is no additional benefit to the routine use of IPC, in reducing VTE risk when used as an adjunct to chemical VTE prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the effect of the implementation of an education package on the use of single-use IPC devices in the intensive care unit to determine the carbon footprint of a pair of IPC devices, and to determine change in waste production, greenhouse gas emissions, and the financial cost associated with change in IPC use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A before-and-after pilot study was undertaken in a single, level III intensive care unit. An audit was conducted to determine the appropriate use of IPC over a 3-month period before and after the delivery of an education package to guide prescription and use of IPC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unnecessary use of IPC reduced from 33/58 (56.9%) to 3/31 (9.7%) after delivery of an education package. According to a bottom-up carbon footprinting analysis, embodied carbon of a single pair of IPC devices was 432.2 g carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e). This study represents a minimum annual saving of $7682.40, 14.9 Kg waste and 51.8 KgCO<sub>2</sub>e associated with reduced unnecessary use of IPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staff education and behaviour change reduced the number of IPC devices used. The number of IPC devices applied inappropriately also reduced, as did associated greenhouse gas emissions and financial cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"101125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The healthcare sector in Australia has committed to reducing carbon emissions associated with care delivery. Thirty percent of care delivered in the Australian hospital sector is considered low-value care. Intensive care uses chemical prophylaxis to reduce risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Mechanical prophylaxis methods, which include intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), are often used as an adjunct to chemical prophylaxis but can also be used in patients where chemical prophylaxis is contraindicated. Recent literature demonstrates, however, that there is no additional benefit to the routine use of IPC, in reducing VTE risk when used as an adjunct to chemical VTE prophylaxis.

Objective: The aims of this study were to assess the effect of the implementation of an education package on the use of single-use IPC devices in the intensive care unit to determine the carbon footprint of a pair of IPC devices, and to determine change in waste production, greenhouse gas emissions, and the financial cost associated with change in IPC use.

Methods: A before-and-after pilot study was undertaken in a single, level III intensive care unit. An audit was conducted to determine the appropriate use of IPC over a 3-month period before and after the delivery of an education package to guide prescription and use of IPC.

Results: Unnecessary use of IPC reduced from 33/58 (56.9%) to 3/31 (9.7%) after delivery of an education package. According to a bottom-up carbon footprinting analysis, embodied carbon of a single pair of IPC devices was 432.2 g carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). This study represents a minimum annual saving of $7682.40, 14.9 Kg waste and 51.8 KgCO2e associated with reduced unnecessary use of IPC.

Conclusion: Staff education and behaviour change reduced the number of IPC devices used. The number of IPC devices applied inappropriately also reduced, as did associated greenhouse gas emissions and financial cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少重症监护中不必要的间歇性气动加压:从环境角度进行前后对比试点研究。
背景:澳大利亚的医疗保健行业已承诺减少与提供医疗服务相关的碳排放。澳大利亚医院部门提供的医疗服务中有 30% 被认为是低价值医疗服务。重症监护使用化学预防方法来降低静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险。机械预防方法(包括间歇性气动加压(IPC))通常作为化学预防的辅助手段,但也可用于禁用化学预防的患者。然而,最近的文献表明,常规使用 IPC 作为 VTE 化学预防疗法的辅助疗法在降低 VTE 风险方面没有额外的益处:本研究的目的是评估在重症监护病房实施教育包对使用一次性 IPC 设备的影响,确定一对 IPC 设备的碳足迹,并确定废物产生量的变化、温室气体排放量以及与 IPC 使用变化相关的财务成本:方法:在一家三级重症监护病房开展了一项前后对比试点研究。方法:在一家三级重症监护病房开展了一项前后对比试点研究,通过审计来确定在提供指导处方和使用 IPC 的教育包前后 3 个月内 IPC 的合理使用情况:结果:在提供教育包后,IPC的不必要使用从33/58(56.9%)减少到3/31(9.7%)。根据自下而上的碳足迹分析,一对 IPC 设备的碳排放量为 432.2 克二氧化碳当量 (CO2e)。这项研究表明,由于减少了对 IPC 的不必要使用,每年至少可节约 7682.40 美元、14.9 千克废物和 51.8 千克二氧化碳当量:结论:员工教育和行为改变减少了 IPC 设备的使用数量。结论:员工教育和行为改变减少了 IPC 设备的使用数量,不当使用 IPC 设备的数量也减少了,相关的温室气体排放和财务成本也减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and risk factors associated within 48-hour unplanned paediatric intensive care unit readmissions: An integrative review. Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score to assess the level of consciousness in patients admitted to intensive care units and emergency departments: A quantitative systematic review. Use of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit: A cross-sectional survey. The influence of anxiety and depression on critical care nurses' performance: A multicenter correlational study. Patients' and relatives' experiences of cognitive impairment following an intensive care unit admission. A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1