Development of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation model for osteomyelitis and usefulness of tedizolid as an alternative to vancomycin against MRSA osteomyelitis.
{"title":"Development of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation model for osteomyelitis and usefulness of tedizolid as an alternative to vancomycin against MRSA osteomyelitis.","authors":"Xiaoxi Liu, Yuki Enoki, Kazuaki Taguchi, Kazuaki Matsumoto","doi":"10.1093/jpp/rgae124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop a suitable osteomyelitis model for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) evaluation and to investigate the target PK/PD values of vancomycin and tedizolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) osteomyelitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An osteomyelitis model was established by implanting an MRSA-exposed sterilized suture in the tibia of normal mice and mice with cyclophosphamide-induced neutropenia. The suitability of the osteomyelitis mouse model for PK/PD evaluation was assessed using vancomycin as an indicator. The target PK/PD values for tedizolid were determined using this model.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>In neutropenic mice, to achieve a static effect and 1 log10 kill against MRSA, the ratios of the area under the free drug concentration-time curve for 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC24/MIC) of vancomycin were 91.29 and 430.03, respectively, confirming the validity of the osteomyelitis model for PK/PD evaluation. In immunocompetent mice, the target fAUC24/MIC values of tedizolid for achieving a static effect and 1 log10 kill against MRSA were 2.40 and 49.20, respectively. Additionally, only a 0.28 log10 kill was achieved in neutropenic mice with 20 times the human equivalent dose of tedizolid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with restored immunity, tedizolid can potentially be used as an alternative to intravenous vancomycin therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpp/rgae124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a suitable osteomyelitis model for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) evaluation and to investigate the target PK/PD values of vancomycin and tedizolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) osteomyelitis.
Methods: An osteomyelitis model was established by implanting an MRSA-exposed sterilized suture in the tibia of normal mice and mice with cyclophosphamide-induced neutropenia. The suitability of the osteomyelitis mouse model for PK/PD evaluation was assessed using vancomycin as an indicator. The target PK/PD values for tedizolid were determined using this model.
Key findings: In neutropenic mice, to achieve a static effect and 1 log10 kill against MRSA, the ratios of the area under the free drug concentration-time curve for 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC24/MIC) of vancomycin were 91.29 and 430.03, respectively, confirming the validity of the osteomyelitis model for PK/PD evaluation. In immunocompetent mice, the target fAUC24/MIC values of tedizolid for achieving a static effect and 1 log10 kill against MRSA were 2.40 and 49.20, respectively. Additionally, only a 0.28 log10 kill was achieved in neutropenic mice with 20 times the human equivalent dose of tedizolid.
Conclusions: In patients with restored immunity, tedizolid can potentially be used as an alternative to intravenous vancomycin therapy.
期刊介绍:
JPP keeps pace with new research on how drug action may be optimized by new technologies, and attention is given to understanding and improving drug interactions in the body. At the same time, the journal maintains its established and well-respected core strengths in areas such as pharmaceutics and drug delivery, experimental and clinical pharmacology, biopharmaceutics and drug disposition, and drugs from natural sources. JPP publishes at least one special issue on a topical theme each year.