Medicaid expansion and medications to treat opioid use disorder in outpatient specialty care from 2010 to 2020

Rachel Presskreischer , Ramin Mojtabai , Christine Mauro , Zhijun Zhang , Melanie Wall , Mark Olfson
{"title":"Medicaid expansion and medications to treat opioid use disorder in outpatient specialty care from 2010 to 2020","authors":"Rachel Presskreischer ,&nbsp;Ramin Mojtabai ,&nbsp;Christine Mauro ,&nbsp;Zhijun Zhang ,&nbsp;Melanie Wall ,&nbsp;Mark Olfson","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are considered the first line treatment for opioid use disorder. As states expanded Medicaid beginning in 2014 under the Affordable Care Act, policymakers and public health officials were interested in the potential for expansion to increase access to MOUD. This study examined whether there were changes in MOUD use within outpatient admissions to specialty treatment facilities in Medicaid expansion states beyond the initial expansion period.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Analyses were conducted using 2010–2020 data from the Treatment Episode Data Set – Admissions. For states that expanded Medicaid prior to 2015, a difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to evaluate whether expansion was associated with an increased proportion of MOUD treatment comparing the initial 2014–2017 period and the 2018–2020 period to 2010–2013. We then conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to examine the overall effect of Medicaid expansion on outpatient MOUD using all states that passed expansion at any point during the study period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among outpatient treatment episodes for OUD in states that expanded Medicaid in 2014, there was a 9.5 percentage point (95 % CI: 0.7–18.2) increase in the probability of receiving MOUD during the initial expansion period from 2014 to 2017 compared to 2010–2013 period, and a 7.5 percentage point (95 % CI: −8.1 –23.1) increase in 2018–2020 (compared to the 2010–2013 period) after adjusting for individual-level covariates. After incorporating states that expanded Medicaid between 2015 and 2020, there was a 6.4 percentage point (95 % CI: −0.01–13.0) increase in the probability of receiving MOUD among individuals receiving care after expansion (compared to the pre-expansion period). During the study period, there was variability among states in the change in probability of receiving MOUD from prior to after Medicaid expansion from an almost 30 percentage point increase in New York to an almost 20 percentage point decrease in Washington, DC.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Medicaid expansion increased the probability of receiving MOUD in outpatient settings across states from initial expansion through 2020. However, these results were not statistically significant. Additionally, significant variability between states warrants further study and suggests that improving access to MOUD will require additional state and local strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 209568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are considered the first line treatment for opioid use disorder. As states expanded Medicaid beginning in 2014 under the Affordable Care Act, policymakers and public health officials were interested in the potential for expansion to increase access to MOUD. This study examined whether there were changes in MOUD use within outpatient admissions to specialty treatment facilities in Medicaid expansion states beyond the initial expansion period.

Methods

Analyses were conducted using 2010–2020 data from the Treatment Episode Data Set – Admissions. For states that expanded Medicaid prior to 2015, a difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to evaluate whether expansion was associated with an increased proportion of MOUD treatment comparing the initial 2014–2017 period and the 2018–2020 period to 2010–2013. We then conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to examine the overall effect of Medicaid expansion on outpatient MOUD using all states that passed expansion at any point during the study period.

Results

Among outpatient treatment episodes for OUD in states that expanded Medicaid in 2014, there was a 9.5 percentage point (95 % CI: 0.7–18.2) increase in the probability of receiving MOUD during the initial expansion period from 2014 to 2017 compared to 2010–2013 period, and a 7.5 percentage point (95 % CI: −8.1 –23.1) increase in 2018–2020 (compared to the 2010–2013 period) after adjusting for individual-level covariates. After incorporating states that expanded Medicaid between 2015 and 2020, there was a 6.4 percentage point (95 % CI: −0.01–13.0) increase in the probability of receiving MOUD among individuals receiving care after expansion (compared to the pre-expansion period). During the study period, there was variability among states in the change in probability of receiving MOUD from prior to after Medicaid expansion from an almost 30 percentage point increase in New York to an almost 20 percentage point decrease in Washington, DC.

Conclusions

Medicaid expansion increased the probability of receiving MOUD in outpatient settings across states from initial expansion through 2020. However, these results were not statistically significant. Additionally, significant variability between states warrants further study and suggests that improving access to MOUD will require additional state and local strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 2010 年到 2020 年,医疗补助扩展与门诊专科治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物。
导言:阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)被认为是阿片类药物使用障碍的一线治疗方法。随着各州从 2014 年开始根据《平价医疗法案》扩大医疗补助范围,政策制定者和公共卫生官员对扩大医疗补助范围以增加阿片类药物使用障碍治疗机会的潜力很感兴趣。本研究考察了医疗补助扩展州的专科治疗机构门诊收治的 MOUD 使用情况在扩展初期之后是否发生了变化:方法:使用2010-2020年治疗事件数据集(Treatment Episode Data Set - Admissions)中的数据进行分析。对于在 2015 年之前扩大医疗补助的州,我们进行了差异分析,以评估与 2010-2013 年相比,2014-2017 年初期和 2018-2020 年期间扩大医疗补助是否与 MOUD 治疗比例的增加有关。然后,我们进行了一项差异分析,利用在研究期间任何时候通过扩展的所有州,研究医疗补助扩展对门诊 MOUD 的总体影响:在2014年扩大医疗补助的各州的OUD门诊治疗中,与2010-2013年期间相比,在2014-2017年的初始扩大期间,接受MOUD的概率增加了9.5个百分点(95 % CI:0.7-18.2),在调整了个人水平协变量后,2018-2020年(与2010-2013年期间相比)增加了7.5个百分点(95 % CI:-8.1-23.1)。在纳入 2015-2020 年间扩大医疗补助的州后,扩大医疗补助后(与扩大前相比)接受护理的个人接受 MOUD 的概率增加了 6.4 个百分点(95 % CI:-0.01-13.0)。在研究期间,各州接受 MOUD 的概率从医疗补助扩展前到扩展后的变化存在差异,纽约州增加了近 30 个百分点,而华盛顿特区则减少了近 20 个百分点:医疗补助计划的扩展增加了各州从扩展初期到 2020 年在门诊环境中接受 MOUD 的概率。然而,这些结果在统计上并不显著。此外,各州之间的显著差异也值得进一步研究,并表明改善 MOUD 的获取需要更多的州和地方策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classes of outpatient quality of care among individuals with substance-related disorders, based on a survey and health insurance registry. Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19. Association between Comprehensive Primary Care Plus and opioid prescribing and prescription fills among Medicare beneficiaries. Text message-delivered cannabis use disorder treatment with young adults: A large randomized clinical trial. Institutional variation of smoking cessation success in Taiwan: A multi-level analysis of the National Second-Generation Tobacco Cessation Program Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1