A rare complication after ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy: Subcapsular renal hematoma.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1177/03915603241292842
Xiaofei Lu, Yingchao Chen, Weiliang Cao, Zhiyong Ding, Benzheng Zhou
{"title":"A rare complication after ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy: Subcapsular renal hematoma.","authors":"Xiaofei Lu, Yingchao Chen, Weiliang Cao, Zhiyong Ding, Benzheng Zhou","doi":"10.1177/03915603241292842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of subcapsular renal hematoma (SRH) following ureterolithotripsy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2014 and December 2023, patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy (URL) at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data including basic information, calculi-related indicators, and perioperative period data were collected. A Student's <i>t</i>-test was used for continuous data, while a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2098 patients treated with URL for ureteric stones were included in this study. The incidence of SRH after URL was 0.52% (11 cases). All SRH cases were confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography, with an average patient age of 55.54 years (range 34-84). The mean stone size in patients with SRH was 10.54 cm (range 0.8-1.5). Patients with SRH had a higher proportion of severe hydronephrosis caused by ureteral stones (54.55% vs 26.07%, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and narrow ureters (45.45% vs 8.04%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to those without SRH. Patients with SRH experienced a longer length of stay, with a significant difference between the two groups (11.64 ± 5.05 vs 3.87 ± 8.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Nine patients were managed conservatively without further intervention, while embolization was required in one patient and percutaneous drainage was performed in another. All SRH cases resolved completely during a 4-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of SRH following URL is low, with severe hydronephrosis and narrow ureters identified as risk factors. Most SRH cases can be successfully managed conservatively, although patients with SRH may experience a significant prolongation of their length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241292842"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241292842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of subcapsular renal hematoma (SRH) following ureterolithotripsy.

Patients and methods: Between January 2014 and December 2023, patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy (URL) at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data including basic information, calculi-related indicators, and perioperative period data were collected. A Student's t-test was used for continuous data, while a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized for categorical data.

Results: A total of 2098 patients treated with URL for ureteric stones were included in this study. The incidence of SRH after URL was 0.52% (11 cases). All SRH cases were confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography, with an average patient age of 55.54 years (range 34-84). The mean stone size in patients with SRH was 10.54 cm (range 0.8-1.5). Patients with SRH had a higher proportion of severe hydronephrosis caused by ureteral stones (54.55% vs 26.07%, p = 0.032) and narrow ureters (45.45% vs 8.04%, p < 0.001) compared to those without SRH. Patients with SRH experienced a longer length of stay, with a significant difference between the two groups (11.64 ± 5.05 vs 3.87 ± 8.12, p < 0.001). Nine patients were managed conservatively without further intervention, while embolization was required in one patient and percutaneous drainage was performed in another. All SRH cases resolved completely during a 4-month follow-up.

Conclusions: The incidence of SRH following URL is low, with severe hydronephrosis and narrow ureters identified as risk factors. Most SRH cases can be successfully managed conservatively, although patients with SRH may experience a significant prolongation of their length of stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输尿管镜碎石术后的罕见并发症:肾下血肿。
目的评估输尿管碎石术后肾囊下血肿(SRH)的发病率、风险因素、临床表现和预后:回顾性研究2014年1月至2023年12月期间在我院接受输尿管镜碎石术(URL)的患者。收集临床数据,包括基本信息、计算相关指标和围手术期数据。连续性数据采用学生 t 检验,分类数据采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验:结果:共有2098名输尿管结石患者接受了URL治疗。URL后SRH的发生率为0.52%(11例)。所有SRH病例均通过非对比计算机断层扫描确认,患者平均年龄为55.54岁(34-84岁不等)。SRH患者的平均结石大小为10.54厘米(范围为0.8-1.5)。SRH 患者因输尿管结石(54.55% 对 26.07%,P = 0.032)和输尿管狭窄(45.45% 对 8.04%,P P 结论)导致严重肾积水的比例更高:URL 后 SRH 的发生率较低,严重肾积水和输尿管狭窄被认为是风险因素。虽然 SRH 患者的住院时间可能会显著延长,但大多数 SRH 病例都能成功地通过保守治疗得到控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures after open radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. On integrative analysis of multi-level gene expression data in Kidney cancer subgrouping. A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access. Potential value of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 score in prediction of final cancer pathology parameters in radical prostatectomy patients. Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) versus surgical findings in assessment of urethral strictures length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1