Patients' anxieties and fears: a comparison between transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate MRI.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-239
Fabian Steinkohl, Anna K Luger, Leonhard Gruber, Renate Pichler, Isabel Heidegger, Jasmin Bektic, Friedrich Aigner
{"title":"Patients' anxieties and fears: a comparison between transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate MRI.","authors":"Fabian Steinkohl, Anna K Luger, Leonhard Gruber, Renate Pichler, Isabel Heidegger, Jasmin Bektic, Friedrich Aigner","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate biopsies are an invasive procedure that can lead to anxieties and fear before the examination. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is seen as a non-invasive test although it is known that \"scanxiety\" affects many patients. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies and multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) are commonly used methods in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigates fears and anxieties towards the TRUS and mpMRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients scheduled for mpMRI or TRUS biopsy between January and December 2018 were asked to participate in this single-center study. A total of 196 completed questionnaires were returned and included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On a 5-point Likert scale the fear of the examination was lower for the mpMRI [1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38 to 1.69] than for a TRUS biopsy (2.47; 95% CI: 2.21 to 2.71). In detail, patients with a scheduled TRUS biopsy had significantly higher levels for fear of pain [2.49 (95% CI: 2.19 to 2.78) <i>vs.</i> 1.51 (95% CI: 1.35 to 1.67); P<0.001] and fear of complications [2.71 (95% CI: 2.45 to 2.98) <i>vs.</i> 2.11 (95% CI: 1.89 to 2.32); P=0.001]. There was no relevant difference about the fact that patients knew what to expect [3.02 (95% CI: 2.68 to 3.35) <i>vs.</i> 2.99 (95% CI: 2.70 to 3.26); P=0.47] and the expectation that the examination will go over well [3.24 (95% CI: 2.92 to 3.57) <i>vs.</i> 3.27 (95% CI: 3.00 to 3.58); P=0.55].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, fear levels were moderate before mpMRI and TRUS biopsy. Patients are more afraid of TRUS biopsy than mpMRI but the differences were low. The biggest fear remains the fear of the result of the examinations independently of the method.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"13 10","pages":"2201-2208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prostate biopsies are an invasive procedure that can lead to anxieties and fear before the examination. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is seen as a non-invasive test although it is known that "scanxiety" affects many patients. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies and multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) are commonly used methods in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigates fears and anxieties towards the TRUS and mpMRI.

Methods: All patients scheduled for mpMRI or TRUS biopsy between January and December 2018 were asked to participate in this single-center study. A total of 196 completed questionnaires were returned and included.

Results: On a 5-point Likert scale the fear of the examination was lower for the mpMRI [1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38 to 1.69] than for a TRUS biopsy (2.47; 95% CI: 2.21 to 2.71). In detail, patients with a scheduled TRUS biopsy had significantly higher levels for fear of pain [2.49 (95% CI: 2.19 to 2.78) vs. 1.51 (95% CI: 1.35 to 1.67); P<0.001] and fear of complications [2.71 (95% CI: 2.45 to 2.98) vs. 2.11 (95% CI: 1.89 to 2.32); P=0.001]. There was no relevant difference about the fact that patients knew what to expect [3.02 (95% CI: 2.68 to 3.35) vs. 2.99 (95% CI: 2.70 to 3.26); P=0.47] and the expectation that the examination will go over well [3.24 (95% CI: 2.92 to 3.57) vs. 3.27 (95% CI: 3.00 to 3.58); P=0.55].

Conclusions: On average, fear levels were moderate before mpMRI and TRUS biopsy. Patients are more afraid of TRUS biopsy than mpMRI but the differences were low. The biggest fear remains the fear of the result of the examinations independently of the method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者的焦虑和恐惧:经直肠前列腺活检与前列腺磁共振成像的比较。
背景:前列腺活检是一项侵入性检查,可能导致患者在检查前产生焦虑和恐惧。前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)被视为非侵入性检查,但众所周知,"扫描焦虑症 "会影响许多患者。经直肠超声(TRUS)引导的前列腺活组织检查和多参数前列腺磁共振成像(mpMRI)是疑似前列腺癌(PCa)患者常用的检查方法。本研究调查了患者对 TRUS 和 mpMRI 的恐惧和焦虑:2018年1月至12月期间,所有计划接受mpMRI或TRUS活检的患者均被要求参与这项单中心研究。共收回并纳入196份填写完整的调查问卷:在5点Likert量表中,mpMRI检查的恐惧感[1.53;95%置信区间(CI):1.38至1.69]低于TRUS活检(2.47;95% CI:2.21至2.71)。具体而言,计划接受 TRUS 活检的患者对疼痛的恐惧程度明显更高[2.49 (95% CI: 2.19 to 2.78) vs. 1.51 (95% CI: 1.35 to 1.67);Pvs. 2.11 (95% CI: 1.89 to 2.32);P=0.001]。患者对检查结果的预期[3.02 (95% CI: 2.68 to 3.35) vs. 2.99 (95% CI: 2.70 to 3.26); P=0.47]和对检查结果的预期[3.24 (95% CI: 2.92 to 3.57) vs. 3.27 (95% CI: 3.00 to 3.58); P=0.55]没有相关差异:mpMRI和TRUS活检前的平均恐惧程度为中等。患者对 TRUS 活检的恐惧程度高于 mpMRI,但差异较小。最大的恐惧仍然是对检查结果的恐惧,与检查方法无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
Robotic ureteral reconstruction of non-absorbable clip erosion into the ureter: a case series. Successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in a man with partial AZFb deletion: a case report. The dartocavernous stitch surgical technique for prevention of recurrent phimosis in obese patients presenting for circumcision. Time-sensitive elements in elective treatment of urinary lithiasis: a narrative review. Understanding general public and healthcare provider knowledge gaps in male factor infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1