Emad Alyan, Stefan Arnau, Julian Elias Reiser, Edmund Wascher
{"title":"Synchronization-based fusion of EEG and eye blink signals for enhanced decoding accuracy.","authors":"Emad Alyan, Stefan Arnau, Julian Elias Reiser, Edmund Wascher","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-78542-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decoding locomotor tasks is crucial in cognitive neuroscience for understanding brain responses to physical tasks. Traditional methods like EEG offer brain activity insights but may require additional modalities for enhanced interpretative precision and depth. The integration of EEG with ocular metrics, particularly eye blinks, presents a promising avenue for understanding cognitive processes by combining neural and ocular behaviors. However, synchronizing EEG and eye blink activities poses a significant challenge due to their frequently inconsistent alignment. Our study with 35 participants performing various locomotor tasks such as standing, walking, and transversing obstacles introduced a novel methodology, pcEEG+, which fuses EEG principal components (pcEEG) with aligned eye blink data (syncBlink). The results demonstrated that pcEEG+ significantly improved decoding accuracy in locomotor tasks, reaching 78% in some conditions, and surpassed standalone pcEEG and syncBlink methods by 7.6% and 22.7%, respectively. The temporal generalization matrix confirmed the consistency of pcEEG+ across tasks and times. The results were replicated using two driving simulator datasets, thereby confirming the validity of our method. This study demonstrates the efficacy of the pcEEG+ method in decoding locomotor tasks, underscoring the importance of temporal synchronization for accuracy and offering a deeper insight into brain activity during complex movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78542-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Decoding locomotor tasks is crucial in cognitive neuroscience for understanding brain responses to physical tasks. Traditional methods like EEG offer brain activity insights but may require additional modalities for enhanced interpretative precision and depth. The integration of EEG with ocular metrics, particularly eye blinks, presents a promising avenue for understanding cognitive processes by combining neural and ocular behaviors. However, synchronizing EEG and eye blink activities poses a significant challenge due to their frequently inconsistent alignment. Our study with 35 participants performing various locomotor tasks such as standing, walking, and transversing obstacles introduced a novel methodology, pcEEG+, which fuses EEG principal components (pcEEG) with aligned eye blink data (syncBlink). The results demonstrated that pcEEG+ significantly improved decoding accuracy in locomotor tasks, reaching 78% in some conditions, and surpassed standalone pcEEG and syncBlink methods by 7.6% and 22.7%, respectively. The temporal generalization matrix confirmed the consistency of pcEEG+ across tasks and times. The results were replicated using two driving simulator datasets, thereby confirming the validity of our method. This study demonstrates the efficacy of the pcEEG+ method in decoding locomotor tasks, underscoring the importance of temporal synchronization for accuracy and offering a deeper insight into brain activity during complex movements.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.