Survey on the radiology report at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital: Clinician and radiologist perspectives.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2954
Liane Thormahlen, Robyn M Wessels, Ilana M Viljoen
{"title":"Survey on the radiology report at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital: Clinician and radiologist perspectives.","authors":"Liane Thormahlen, Robyn M Wessels, Ilana M Viljoen","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The radiology report is the primary means of conveying imaging findings between radiologists and clinicians. As a result, clinician satisfaction with the radiology report is an indicator of its quality and clinical relevance. It is crucial to identify factors that can enhance the radiology report in order to improve service delivery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates clinician and radiologist opinions, preferences and clinician utilisation of the radiology report.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Mixed quantitative and qualitative survey questionnaires were distributed in-person and online from December 2022 to February 2023 to a total of 287 clinicians and 43 independent medical practitioners specialising in radiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73.0% of radiologists and 56.5% of clinicians expressed satisfaction with the radiology reports. Additionally, 72.0% of radiologists expressed dissatisfaction with the history provided on the referral forms. It was found that 87.6% of clinicians read the radiology report, while 26.2% reviewed the radiological imaging without referring to it. Interestingly, 77.8% of clinicians preferred itemised listed reports, whereas 53.8% of radiologists preferred reports in paragraph format. It was discovered that 69.6% of radiologists and 65.4% of clinicians preferred a standardised reporting format.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than half of the clinicians and most of the radiologists expressed satisfaction with the radiology report. Both clinicians and radiologists showed a preference for a structured reporting format. A crucial element in constructing a good radiology report was having a relevant clinical history. The radiologist continued to be the preferred professional for interpreting radiological imaging.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This survey was a good starting point for improving communication between clinicians and radiologists. This will ultimately result in reports that are more useful to clinicians and radiologists who have a better understanding of what should be included in reports and how they should be structured.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The radiology report is the primary means of conveying imaging findings between radiologists and clinicians. As a result, clinician satisfaction with the radiology report is an indicator of its quality and clinical relevance. It is crucial to identify factors that can enhance the radiology report in order to improve service delivery.

Objectives: This study evaluates clinician and radiologist opinions, preferences and clinician utilisation of the radiology report.

Method: Mixed quantitative and qualitative survey questionnaires were distributed in-person and online from December 2022 to February 2023 to a total of 287 clinicians and 43 independent medical practitioners specialising in radiology.

Results: A total of 73.0% of radiologists and 56.5% of clinicians expressed satisfaction with the radiology reports. Additionally, 72.0% of radiologists expressed dissatisfaction with the history provided on the referral forms. It was found that 87.6% of clinicians read the radiology report, while 26.2% reviewed the radiological imaging without referring to it. Interestingly, 77.8% of clinicians preferred itemised listed reports, whereas 53.8% of radiologists preferred reports in paragraph format. It was discovered that 69.6% of radiologists and 65.4% of clinicians preferred a standardised reporting format.

Conclusion: More than half of the clinicians and most of the radiologists expressed satisfaction with the radiology report. Both clinicians and radiologists showed a preference for a structured reporting format. A crucial element in constructing a good radiology report was having a relevant clinical history. The radiologist continued to be the preferred professional for interpreting radiological imaging.

Contribution: This survey was a good starting point for improving communication between clinicians and radiologists. This will ultimately result in reports that are more useful to clinicians and radiologists who have a better understanding of what should be included in reports and how they should be structured.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克里斯-哈尼-巴拉夸那思学术医院放射报告调查:临床医生和放射科医生的观点。
背景:放射学报告是放射科医生和临床医生之间传递成像结果的主要手段。因此,临床医生对放射学报告的满意度是衡量其质量和临床相关性的指标。因此,找出能提高放射学报告质量的因素以改善服务至关重要:本研究评估临床医生和放射科医生对放射学报告的意见、偏好和使用情况:方法:从2022年12月至2023年2月,向287名临床医生和43名放射科专业独立执业医师当面和在线发放了定量和定性混合调查问卷:共有 73.0% 的放射科医生和 56.5% 的临床医生对放射报告表示满意。此外,72.0% 的放射科医生对转诊表中提供的病史表示不满意。研究发现,87.6% 的临床医生阅读了放射学报告,而 26.2% 的临床医生在未参考报告的情况下查看了放射成像。有趣的是,77.8% 的临床医生喜欢逐项罗列的报告,而 53.8% 的放射科医生喜欢段落格式的报告。研究发现,69.6% 的放射科医生和 65.4% 的临床医生更喜欢标准化的报告格式:结论:半数以上的临床医生和大多数放射科医生对放射报告表示满意。临床医生和放射科医生都表示更喜欢结构化的报告格式。撰写一份好的放射学报告的关键因素是要有相关的临床病史。放射科医生仍然是解释放射成像的首选专业人员:这项调查为改善临床医生和放射科医生之间的沟通提供了一个良好的起点。贡献:这项调查是改善临床医生和放射科医生之间沟通的良好开端,最终将使临床医生和放射科医生更好地了解报告中应包含的内容和报告的结构,从而使报告对临床医生和放射科医生更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
期刊最新文献
Advanced tumour-induced osteomalacia secondary to sinonasal phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. Imaging of pelvic floor disorders involving the posterior compartment on dynamic MR defaecography. Survey on the radiology report at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital: Clinician and radiologist perspectives. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Retrospective study of detecting oesophageal injuries post neck trauma: CTA versus fluoroscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1