Comorbidities and determinants of health on heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy adherence: All of us

Trinh Do , Kyrillos Grace , Dawn Lombardo , Nathan D. Wong , Andy Y. Lee
{"title":"Comorbidities and determinants of health on heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy adherence: All of us","authors":"Trinh Do ,&nbsp;Kyrillos Grace ,&nbsp;Dawn Lombardo ,&nbsp;Nathan D. Wong ,&nbsp;Andy Y. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are challenging conditions to treat due to complex pathophysiology and associated comorbidities. However, recent trials have demonstrated improved outcomes with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for each subtype of heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated the relationship of determinants of health and risk factors with GDMT use for HFrEF and HFpEF in a large, diverse US cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the NIH-sponsored All of Us Program, we compared demographics, risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, smoking), and SDOH measures between HFrEF and HFpEF in US adults aged 18 years and older. We examined the proportions of HFrEF patients receiving fewer than four or all four GDMTs. HFpEF patients receiving two medications were compared with those receiving less than two recommended medications. Multiple logistic regression was used for data analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>Of 6049 HFrEF patients, 5838 (97 %) received fewer than four GDMTs, and 210 (3 %) received quadruple therapy. Of 3774 HFpEF patients, 162 (4 %) were on 2/3 GDMT, and only 38 (1 %) were on all three recommended medications. Patients with ASCVD and diabetes had higher odds of being on more than half of the recommended GDMT for both HFrEF and HFpEF. Additionally, females had higher odds of being on 2/3 GDMT for HFpEF (1.46 [1.08, 2.00]). Race, income, education, and health insurance types did not predict GDMT optimization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HFrEF and HFpEF GDMT remain underutilized. Future efforts to address comorbidities and system-wide healthcare interventions may improve heart failure GDMT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524001168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are challenging conditions to treat due to complex pathophysiology and associated comorbidities. However, recent trials have demonstrated improved outcomes with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for each subtype of heart failure.

Objective

We investigated the relationship of determinants of health and risk factors with GDMT use for HFrEF and HFpEF in a large, diverse US cohort.

Methods

Using the NIH-sponsored All of Us Program, we compared demographics, risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, smoking), and SDOH measures between HFrEF and HFpEF in US adults aged 18 years and older. We examined the proportions of HFrEF patients receiving fewer than four or all four GDMTs. HFpEF patients receiving two medications were compared with those receiving less than two recommended medications. Multiple logistic regression was used for data analysis.

Result

Of 6049 HFrEF patients, 5838 (97 %) received fewer than four GDMTs, and 210 (3 %) received quadruple therapy. Of 3774 HFpEF patients, 162 (4 %) were on 2/3 GDMT, and only 38 (1 %) were on all three recommended medications. Patients with ASCVD and diabetes had higher odds of being on more than half of the recommended GDMT for both HFrEF and HFpEF. Additionally, females had higher odds of being on 2/3 GDMT for HFpEF (1.46 [1.08, 2.00]). Race, income, education, and health insurance types did not predict GDMT optimization.

Conclusion

HFrEF and HFpEF GDMT remain underutilized. Future efforts to address comorbidities and system-wide healthcare interventions may improve heart failure GDMT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合并症和健康决定因素对心力衰竭指南指导下的药物治疗依从性的影响:我们所有人
背景射血分数减低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)和射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)由于病理生理学复杂且伴有合并症,因此治疗难度很大。我们在一个大型的、多样化的美国队列中调查了健康决定因素和风险因素与使用 GDMT 治疗 HFrEF 和 HFpEF 之间的关系。我们研究了接受少于四种或全部四种 GDMTs 治疗的 HFrEF 患者的比例。接受两种药物治疗的 HFpEF 患者与接受少于两种推荐药物治疗的患者进行了比较。结果 在 6049 名 HFrEF 患者中,5838 人(97%)接受了少于四种 GDMT,210 人(3%)接受了四联疗法。在 3774 名高频低氧血症患者中,162 人(4%)接受了 2/3 种 GDMT 治疗,只有 38 人(1%)接受了所有三种推荐药物治疗。对于 HFrEF 和 HFpEF 患者而言,患有 ASCVD 和糖尿病的患者接受一半以上推荐 GDMT 治疗的几率更高。此外,女性服用 2/3 GDMT 治疗 HFpEF 的几率更高(1.46 [1.08, 2.00])。种族、收入、教育程度和医疗保险类型并不能预测 GDMT 的优化情况。未来解决合并症和全系统医疗干预的努力可能会改善心衰 GDMT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Interplay between lifestyle factors and polygenic risk for incident coronary heart disease in a large multiethnic cohort Comorbidities and determinants of health on heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy adherence: All of us Case detection of familial hypercholesterolemia using various criteria during an annual health examination in the workplace Does the timing of blood pressure medication really matter? Predictive value of glucose coefficient of variation for in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI: Insights from the MIMIC-IV database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1