{"title":"Optimizing fosfomycin dosing regimens in critically ill patients with and without continuous renal replacement therapy","authors":"Taniya Charoensareerat , Phongphak Bunrit , Sasina Phanpoka , Thananya Netthanomsak , Dhakrit Rungkitwattanakul , Sutthiporn Pattharachayakul , Nattachai Srisawat , Weerachai Chaijamorn","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To define the optimal fosfomycin dosing regimens for drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in critically ill patients and those receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) via Monte Carlo simulations.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A pharmacokinetic model for patients with and without CRRT was created to predict fosfomycin deposition in these patients. The pharmacodynamics (PD) targets were AUC/MIC ratio > 21.5, 28.2, and 98.8 for drug-resistant <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> (KP), <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (PA) and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (EC) infections, respectively. The optimal regimen was defined when the probability of target attainment (PTA) was >90 % of the virtual patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The fosfomycin dosing regimens for KP infections with MIC 64 mg/L in critically ill patients and who received CRRT were 6 g every 8 h and 8 g every 12 h, respectively. For PA infections, the regimens of 6 g every 6 h and 7 g every 8 h achieved the target in critically ill patients and those undergoing CRRT. No regimen achieved the 90 % PTA against the EC infection with MIC >32 mg/L.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dosing regimens for bacteria with high MICs as 64 mg/L in these patients were 18–24 g/day. Dose adjustments were required in those undergoing CRRT. Clinical validation is strongly needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 154946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124004337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To define the optimal fosfomycin dosing regimens for drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in critically ill patients and those receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) via Monte Carlo simulations.
Materials and methods
A pharmacokinetic model for patients with and without CRRT was created to predict fosfomycin deposition in these patients. The pharmacodynamics (PD) targets were AUC/MIC ratio > 21.5, 28.2, and 98.8 for drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and Escherichia coli (EC) infections, respectively. The optimal regimen was defined when the probability of target attainment (PTA) was >90 % of the virtual patients.
Results
The fosfomycin dosing regimens for KP infections with MIC 64 mg/L in critically ill patients and who received CRRT were 6 g every 8 h and 8 g every 12 h, respectively. For PA infections, the regimens of 6 g every 6 h and 7 g every 8 h achieved the target in critically ill patients and those undergoing CRRT. No regimen achieved the 90 % PTA against the EC infection with MIC >32 mg/L.
Conclusions
Dosing regimens for bacteria with high MICs as 64 mg/L in these patients were 18–24 g/day. Dose adjustments were required in those undergoing CRRT. Clinical validation is strongly needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.