Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit

Monica Lauridsen Kujabi MD, PhD , Natasha Housseine MD, PhD , Idrissa Kabanda MD , Rukia Msumi MD , Luzango Maembe MD , Mtingele Sangalala MD , Manyanga Hudson MD , Sarah Hansen BSc. Med. , Anna Macha MD , Brenda Sequeira D'mello MD , Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch PhD , Flemming Konradsen PhD , Andreas Kryger Jensen PhD , Kidanto Hussein MD, PhD , Nanna Maaløe MD, PhD , Thomas van den Akker MD, PhD
{"title":"Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit","authors":"Monica Lauridsen Kujabi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Natasha Housseine MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Idrissa Kabanda MD ,&nbsp;Rukia Msumi MD ,&nbsp;Luzango Maembe MD ,&nbsp;Mtingele Sangalala MD ,&nbsp;Manyanga Hudson MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Hansen BSc. Med. ,&nbsp;Anna Macha MD ,&nbsp;Brenda Sequeira D'mello MD ,&nbsp;Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch PhD ,&nbsp;Flemming Konradsen PhD ,&nbsp;Andreas Kryger Jensen PhD ,&nbsp;Kidanto Hussein MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nanna Maaløe MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas van den Akker MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Similar to many resource-constrained urban settings, cesarean deliveries in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, have increased rapidly, from 17% in 2015 to 26% in 2022. Alarmingly, at the population level, the increase was not followed by improvements in perinatal outcomes, suggesting the overuse of cesarean delivery. Prolonged labor is the leading cause of women's first cesarean delivery. Therefore, understanding the management of prolonged labor preceding cesarean delivery is crucial for preventing nonmedically indicated cesarean deliveries across Tanzania and globally.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to estimate the proportion of cesarean deliveries with a written indication of prolonged labor that was performed in labors with uncomplicated progression.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><div>This study was conducted at 5 urban maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, from October 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022. Data were extracted from case files of women who gave birth via cesarean delivery with a written indication of prolonged labor. The timing of cesarean delivery decision was assessed against predefined definitions of prolonged labor at each stage/phase of labor. The proportion of cesarean deliveries performed in cases of uncomplicated progression was calculated. The exclusion criteria included referral to study sites because of prolonged labor or cervical dilatation of &gt;6 cm upon admission, noncephalic presentation, multiple pregnancy, intrauterine fetal death, failed induction of labor, previous cesarean delivery, or other written indications for cesarean delivery.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The overall cesarean delivery rate was 32% (2949/9364). Of first-time cesarean delivery cases, 746 of 1517 patients (47.9%) had a written indication of prolonged labor. Finally, 456 of 746 patients (61.1%) met the inclusion criteria, of which 307 of 456 patients (67.3%) were admitted in the latent phase of labor. In 243 of 456 cesarean deliveries (53.3%) with an indication of prolonged labor, labor was not prolonged. This group included (1) women not being given a trial of labor (78/243 [32.1%]), (2) women in the first stage of active labor not crossing the partograph action line (145/243 [59.7%]), and (3) women in the second stage of labor lasting &lt;1 hour (20/243 [8.2%]). Of note, 78 of 346 women (21.5%) in the first stage of active labor had a labor progression faster than 0.5 cm per hour preceding the decision for cesarean delivery.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Almost half of cesarean deliveries in unscarred uteri were because of prolonged labor. Despite a written indication of prolonged labor, approximately half of the cases did not have prolonged labor. Although care in low-resource settings has traditionally been categorized as “too little, too late,” this study finds care as “too much, too soon” in one of the world's fastest-growing urban areas. This finding highlights the inadequacy of one-size-fits-all approaches in curbing the increases in cesarean delivery occurring in (pockets of) low-resource settings. Our study calls for ways to respectfully allow more time for physiological labor progression in busy high-volume maternity units where many births occur.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Similar to many resource-constrained urban settings, cesarean deliveries in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, have increased rapidly, from 17% in 2015 to 26% in 2022. Alarmingly, at the population level, the increase was not followed by improvements in perinatal outcomes, suggesting the overuse of cesarean delivery. Prolonged labor is the leading cause of women's first cesarean delivery. Therefore, understanding the management of prolonged labor preceding cesarean delivery is crucial for preventing nonmedically indicated cesarean deliveries across Tanzania and globally.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the proportion of cesarean deliveries with a written indication of prolonged labor that was performed in labors with uncomplicated progression.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was conducted at 5 urban maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, from October 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022. Data were extracted from case files of women who gave birth via cesarean delivery with a written indication of prolonged labor. The timing of cesarean delivery decision was assessed against predefined definitions of prolonged labor at each stage/phase of labor. The proportion of cesarean deliveries performed in cases of uncomplicated progression was calculated. The exclusion criteria included referral to study sites because of prolonged labor or cervical dilatation of >6 cm upon admission, noncephalic presentation, multiple pregnancy, intrauterine fetal death, failed induction of labor, previous cesarean delivery, or other written indications for cesarean delivery.

RESULTS

The overall cesarean delivery rate was 32% (2949/9364). Of first-time cesarean delivery cases, 746 of 1517 patients (47.9%) had a written indication of prolonged labor. Finally, 456 of 746 patients (61.1%) met the inclusion criteria, of which 307 of 456 patients (67.3%) were admitted in the latent phase of labor. In 243 of 456 cesarean deliveries (53.3%) with an indication of prolonged labor, labor was not prolonged. This group included (1) women not being given a trial of labor (78/243 [32.1%]), (2) women in the first stage of active labor not crossing the partograph action line (145/243 [59.7%]), and (3) women in the second stage of labor lasting <1 hour (20/243 [8.2%]). Of note, 78 of 346 women (21.5%) in the first stage of active labor had a labor progression faster than 0.5 cm per hour preceding the decision for cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of cesarean deliveries in unscarred uteri were because of prolonged labor. Despite a written indication of prolonged labor, approximately half of the cases did not have prolonged labor. Although care in low-resource settings has traditionally been categorized as “too little, too late,” this study finds care as “too much, too soon” in one of the world's fastest-growing urban areas. This finding highlights the inadequacy of one-size-fits-all approaches in curbing the increases in cesarean delivery occurring in (pockets of) low-resource settings. Our study calls for ways to respectfully allow more time for physiological labor progression in busy high-volume maternity units where many births occur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦桑尼亚城市因产程延长而进行剖腹产的时机:基于标准的审计
背景坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的剖宫产率与许多资源有限的城市环境相似,从 2015 年的 17% 迅速上升到 2022 年的 26%。令人担忧的是,在人口层面上,围产期结果并没有随之改善,这表明过度使用了剖宫产。产程延长是妇女首次剖宫产的主要原因。因此,了解剖宫产前产程延长的管理对于在坦桑尼亚乃至全球范围内预防非医学指征的剖宫产至关重要。研究设计本研究于 2021 年 10 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的 5 个城市产科医院进行。研究人员从剖宫产产妇的病例档案中提取数据,这些产妇都有产程延长的书面说明。根据预定义的产程各阶段产程延长的定义,对决定剖宫产的时间进行了评估。计算了无并发症进展情况下的剖宫产比例。排除标准包括因产程延长或入院时宫颈扩张达>6 cm、非头位妊娠、多胎妊娠、胎儿宫内死亡、引产失败、既往剖宫产或其他书面剖宫产指征而转入研究机构。结果总体剖宫产率为32%(2949/9364)。在首次剖宫产病例中,1517 例患者中有 746 例(47.9%)有延长产程的书面指征。最后,746 例患者中有 456 例(61.1%)符合纳入标准,其中 456 例患者中有 307 例(67.3%)在潜伏产程阶段入院。在 456 例有延长产程指征的剖宫产中,有 243 例(53.3%)的产程没有延长。这部分产妇包括:(1)未进行试产的产妇(78/243 [32.1%]);(2)处于第一产程的产妇未越过分宫图作用线(145/243 [59.7%]);以及(3)处于第二产程的产妇,产程持续了1小时(20/243 [8.2%])。值得注意的是,346 名处于第一产程的产妇中,有 78 名(21.5%)在决定剖宫产前的产程进展快于每小时 0.5 厘米。尽管有产程延长的书面提示,但约有一半的病例并没有出现产程延长。尽管在资源匮乏的环境中,传统的护理方式被归类为 "太少、太晚",但本研究发现,在世界上发展最快的城市之一,护理方式却是 "太多、太快"。这一发现凸显了 "一刀切 "的方法不足以遏制(小部分)低资源地区剖宫产率的上升。我们的研究呼吁,在分娩量大的繁忙产科病房中,应尊重产妇的生理规律,为其留出更多的分娩时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ghana abortion care—a model for others: analysis of the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey Utilizing machine learning to predict the risk factors of episiotomy in parturient women Immediate postplacental intrauterine device placement: retrospective cohort study of expulsion and associated risk factors Effect of maternal beta-blocker treatment on mean fetal heart rate Balancing screen time during pregnancy: implications for maternal and fetal health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1