Preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR versus [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective preliminary study

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s00259-024-06943-z
Zeyu Zhang, Shiwei Guo, Weiwei Su, Guixia Pan, Kai Cao, Hui Jiang, Lu Zhang, Chao Cheng, Gang Jin, Changjing Zuo
{"title":"Preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR versus [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective preliminary study","authors":"Zeyu Zhang, Shiwei Guo, Weiwei Su, Guixia Pan, Kai Cao, Hui Jiang, Lu Zhang, Chao Cheng, Gang Jin, Changjing Zuo","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-06943-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer and compare it with that of [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Thirty-one patients with pancreatic cancer underwent preoperative [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR, [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT, and CECT imaging. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed two sets of images (set 1, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR; set 2, [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT) and reached a consensus on tumour resectability, N staging (N0 or N positive) and M staging (M0 or M1). Based on the above indices, the resectability of the tumour was determined according to a five-point scale. Clinical, operative, and pathological findings were used as a reference standard to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging sets via the McNemar test.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was not significantly different from that of [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging in the assessment of tumour resectability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.854 vs. 0.775, <i>p</i> = 0.192), N staging [accuracy: 82.4% (14 of 17 patients) vs. 58.8% (10 of 17 patients), <i>p</i> = 0.125] and M staging [accuracy: 100% (31 of 31 patients) vs. 90.3% (28 of 31 patients), <i>p</i> = 0.250]. However, compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging changed the M stage in three patients by upstaging from M0 to M1 in 2 patients and downstaging from M1 to M0 in 2 patients. In 13 patients with liver metastases, the number of liver metastases detected via [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was greater than that detected via [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging (324 vs. 240). In 3 patients with peritoneal metastases, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging detected more peritoneal metastases than did [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging has diagnostic accuracy comparable to [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT in terms of preoperative staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic cancer; additionally, it exhibits superior capability in detecting liver and peritoneal metastases. Consequently, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR has the potential to become a one-stop imaging tool for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06943-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer and compare it with that of [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).

Methods

Thirty-one patients with pancreatic cancer underwent preoperative [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR, [18F]-FDG PET/CT, and CECT imaging. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed two sets of images (set 1, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR; set 2, [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT) and reached a consensus on tumour resectability, N staging (N0 or N positive) and M staging (M0 or M1). Based on the above indices, the resectability of the tumour was determined according to a five-point scale. Clinical, operative, and pathological findings were used as a reference standard to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging sets via the McNemar test.

Results

The diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was not significantly different from that of [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging in the assessment of tumour resectability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.854 vs. 0.775, p = 0.192), N staging [accuracy: 82.4% (14 of 17 patients) vs. 58.8% (10 of 17 patients), p = 0.125] and M staging [accuracy: 100% (31 of 31 patients) vs. 90.3% (28 of 31 patients), p = 0.250]. However, compared with [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging changed the M stage in three patients by upstaging from M0 to M1 in 2 patients and downstaging from M1 to M0 in 2 patients. In 13 patients with liver metastases, the number of liver metastases detected via [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was greater than that detected via [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging (324 vs. 240). In 3 patients with peritoneal metastases, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging detected more peritoneal metastases than did [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging.

Conclusions

[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging has diagnostic accuracy comparable to [18F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT in terms of preoperative staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic cancer; additionally, it exhibits superior capability in detecting liver and peritoneal metastases. Consequently, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR has the potential to become a one-stop imaging tool for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR与[18F]-FDG PET/CT加对比增强CT对胰腺癌进行术前评估:一项前瞻性初步研究
目的 评估[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR成像在胰腺癌术前评估中的诊断性能,并将其与[18F]-FDG PET/CT加对比增强CT(CECT)的诊断性能进行比较。方法 31例胰腺癌患者在术前接受了[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR、[18F]-FDG PET/CT和CECT成像。两名核医学医生独立审查两组图像(第一组,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR;第二组,[18F]-FDG PET/CT 加 CECT),并就肿瘤可切除性、N 分期(N0 或 N 阳性)和 M 分期(M0 或 M1)达成共识。根据上述指标,按照五级评分法确定肿瘤的可切除性。结果在评估肿瘤可切除性方面,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR成像的诊断性能与[18F]-FDG PET/CT加CECT成像的诊断性能无显著差异(接收器操作特征曲线下面积:0.854 vs. 0.075):0.854对0.775,P=0.192)、N分期[准确率:82.4%(17例患者中的14例)对58.8%(17例患者中的10例),P=0.125]和M分期[准确率:100%(31例患者中的31例)对90.3%(31例患者中的28例),P=0.250]。然而,与[18F]-FDG PET/CT加CECT成像相比,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR成像改变了3名患者的M分期,其中2名患者从M0分期上调至M1,2名患者从M1分期下调至M0。在13例肝转移患者中,通过[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR成像检测到的肝转移灶数量(324个对240个)高于通过[18F]-FDG PET/CT加CECT成像检测到的肝转移灶数量。在3例腹膜转移患者中,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR成像检测到的腹膜转移灶多于[18F]-FDG PET/CT加CECT成像检测到的腹膜转移灶。结论 在胰腺癌术前分期和可切除性评估方面,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR成像的诊断准确性与[18F]-FDG PET/CT加CECT成像相当;此外,它在检测肝转移和腹膜转移方面表现出更强的能力。因此,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR 有可能成为胰腺癌术前评估的一站式成像工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
EANM expert opinion: How can lessons from radiobiology be applied to the design of clinical trials? Part I: back to the basics of absorbed dose–response and threshold absorbed doses Towards the clinical translation of a silver sulfide nanoparticle contrast agent: large scale production with a highly parallelized microfluidic chip Effect of molar dose on the in vivo tissue biodistribution profile of FAP-targeted radioligand therapeutics Expert consensus on workflow of PET/CT with long axial field-of-view Design, preclinical evaluation, and first-in-human PET study of [68Ga]Ga-PSFA-01: a PSMA/FAP heterobivalent tracer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1