Fast Computational Method for PWM Strategy Comparison of Machine and Inverter Electrical Losses: Application on WLTC Cycle

IF 7.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1109/TIE.2024.3482006
Salma Benharref;Vincent Lanfranchi;Daniel Depernet;Tahar Hamiti;Sara Bazhar
{"title":"Fast Computational Method for PWM Strategy Comparison of Machine and Inverter Electrical Losses: Application on WLTC Cycle","authors":"Salma Benharref;Vincent Lanfranchi;Daniel Depernet;Tahar Hamiti;Sara Bazhar","doi":"10.1109/TIE.2024.3482006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For electric vehicle motors, it is essential to control the sources of loss which could reduce the overall efficiency of the system. In this context, this article aims to present a detailed comparison of machine and inverter losses between the space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) and the discontinuous pulse width modulation 2 (DPWM2). To compare both PWM strategies on the WLTC (worldwide harmonized light vehicles test cycles) cycle in an efficient way, a full analytical model is used to predict inverter losses and a sequential use of an analytical and a finite element analysis is used to perform an in-depth analysis of machine losses. This semianalytical method which can be used for any pulse width modulation (PWM) strategy allows to speed up the calculations and the comparison of different PWM schemes. Experiments were then conducted for different operating points and supply voltage levels to validate the results. The theoretical and experimental results show that although the DPWM2 allows to reduce inverter losses, it still generates more machine losses compared to the SVPWM especially on the WLTC cycle, which makes the DPWM2 less efficient. Nevertheless, depending on the total supply voltage, the DPWM2 could be more or less interesting on the WLTC cycle with comparison with the SVPWM.","PeriodicalId":13402,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics","volume":"72 6","pages":"5549-5557"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10745991/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For electric vehicle motors, it is essential to control the sources of loss which could reduce the overall efficiency of the system. In this context, this article aims to present a detailed comparison of machine and inverter losses between the space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) and the discontinuous pulse width modulation 2 (DPWM2). To compare both PWM strategies on the WLTC (worldwide harmonized light vehicles test cycles) cycle in an efficient way, a full analytical model is used to predict inverter losses and a sequential use of an analytical and a finite element analysis is used to perform an in-depth analysis of machine losses. This semianalytical method which can be used for any pulse width modulation (PWM) strategy allows to speed up the calculations and the comparison of different PWM schemes. Experiments were then conducted for different operating points and supply voltage levels to validate the results. The theoretical and experimental results show that although the DPWM2 allows to reduce inverter losses, it still generates more machine losses compared to the SVPWM especially on the WLTC cycle, which makes the DPWM2 less efficient. Nevertheless, depending on the total supply voltage, the DPWM2 could be more or less interesting on the WLTC cycle with comparison with the SVPWM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于比较机器和逆变器电气损耗的 PWM 策略的快速计算方法:在 WLTC 循环中的应用
对于电动汽车电机来说,控制损耗源是至关重要的,因为损耗源会降低系统的整体效率。在此背景下,本文旨在详细比较空间矢量脉宽调制(SVPWM)和不连续脉宽调制2 (DPWM2)之间的机器和逆变器损耗。为了有效地比较WLTC(全球统一轻型车辆测试周期)周期上的两种PWM策略,使用完整的分析模型来预测逆变器损耗,并使用连续的分析和有限元分析来对机器损耗进行深入分析。这种半解析方法可用于任何脉宽调制(PWM)策略,可以加快不同脉宽调制方案的计算和比较。然后进行了不同工作点和电源电压水平的实验来验证结果。理论和实验结果表明,虽然DPWM2可以降低逆变器损耗,但与SVPWM相比,它仍然产生更多的机器损耗,特别是在WLTC周期上,这使得DPWM2效率较低。然而,根据总电源电压的不同,与SVPWM相比,DPWM2在WLTC周期上或多或少会引起人们的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1396
审稿时长
6.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal Name: IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics Publication Frequency: Monthly Scope: The scope of IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics encompasses the following areas: Applications of electronics, controls, and communications in industrial and manufacturing systems and processes. Power electronics and drive control techniques. System control and signal processing. Fault detection and diagnosis. Power systems. Instrumentation, measurement, and testing. Modeling and simulation. Motion control. Robotics. Sensors and actuators. Implementation of neural networks, fuzzy logic, and artificial intelligence in industrial systems. Factory automation. Communication and computer networks.
期刊最新文献
New FFIMMC Control Design for the Detection and Mitigation of Hybrid Cyber Threats Self-Oscillating Joule Thief Converters for MEMS Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting: Analytical Modeling and Experimental Validation Dynamic Adaptive Correction Strategy for Position Sensorless BLDCM Commutation Error Based on Sign Detection Calculation and Analysis of Interturn Voltage Stress in Hairpin Windings for EV Traction Machines Considering the End-Winding Parasitic Effect A Smooth Time-Optimal Motion Control Strategy of Industrial Manipulator Subject to Hybrid Joint Constraints Synthesized by Low-Computational-Complexity Zeroing Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1