A meta-analysis of loneliness and risk of dementia using longitudinal data from >600,000 individuals

Martina Luchetti, Damaris Aschwanden, Amanda A. Sesker, Xianghe Zhu, Páraic S. O’Súilleabháin, Yannick Stephan, Antonio Terracciano, Angelina R. Sutin
{"title":"A meta-analysis of loneliness and risk of dementia using longitudinal data from >600,000 individuals","authors":"Martina Luchetti, Damaris Aschwanden, Amanda A. Sesker, Xianghe Zhu, Páraic S. O’Súilleabháin, Yannick Stephan, Antonio Terracciano, Angelina R. Sutin","doi":"10.1038/s44220-024-00328-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Loneliness is one critical risk factor for cognitive health. Here we combined data from ongoing aging studies and the published literature and provide the largest meta-analysis on the association between loneliness and dementia (k = 21 samples, N = 608,561) and cognitive impairment (k = 16, N = 103,387). Loneliness increased the risk for all-cause dementia (hazard ratio (HR) 1.306, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.197–1.426), Alzheimer’s disease (HR 1.393, 95% CI 1.290–1.504; k = 5), vascular dementia (HR 1.735, 95% CI 1.483–2.029; k = 3) and cognitive impairment (HR 1.150, 95% CI 1.113–1.189). The associations persisted when models controlled for depression, social isolation and/or other modifiable risk factors for dementia. The large heterogeneity across studies was partly due to differences in loneliness measures and ascertainment of cognitive status. The results underscore the importance to further examine the type or sources of loneliness and cognitive symptoms to develop effective interventions that reduce the risk of dementia. Using data from large longitudinal observational studies, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the association between loneliness and dementia.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"2 11","pages":"1350-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00328-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness is one critical risk factor for cognitive health. Here we combined data from ongoing aging studies and the published literature and provide the largest meta-analysis on the association between loneliness and dementia (k = 21 samples, N = 608,561) and cognitive impairment (k = 16, N = 103,387). Loneliness increased the risk for all-cause dementia (hazard ratio (HR) 1.306, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.197–1.426), Alzheimer’s disease (HR 1.393, 95% CI 1.290–1.504; k = 5), vascular dementia (HR 1.735, 95% CI 1.483–2.029; k = 3) and cognitive impairment (HR 1.150, 95% CI 1.113–1.189). The associations persisted when models controlled for depression, social isolation and/or other modifiable risk factors for dementia. The large heterogeneity across studies was partly due to differences in loneliness measures and ascertainment of cognitive status. The results underscore the importance to further examine the type or sources of loneliness and cognitive symptoms to develop effective interventions that reduce the risk of dementia. Using data from large longitudinal observational studies, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the association between loneliness and dementia.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用超过 60 万人的纵向数据对孤独与痴呆症风险进行荟萃分析
孤独是影响认知健康的一个重要风险因素。在此,我们综合了正在进行的老龄化研究和已发表文献中的数据,对孤独与痴呆(k = 21 个样本,样本数 = 608,561 人)和认知障碍(k = 16 个样本,样本数 = 103,387 人)之间的关系进行了最大规模的荟萃分析。孤独增加了全因痴呆(危险比 (HR) 1.306,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.197-1.426)、阿尔茨海默病(HR 1.393,95% CI 1.290-1.504;k = 5)、血管性痴呆(HR 1.735,95% CI 1.483-2.029;k = 3)和认知障碍(HR 1.150,95% CI 1.113-1.189)的风险。当模型控制了抑郁、社会隔离和/或其他可改变的痴呆风险因素后,这些关联仍然存在。不同研究之间存在巨大的异质性,部分原因是孤独感测量方法和认知状况确定方法存在差异。研究结果强调了进一步研究孤独感和认知症状的类型或来源的重要性,以便制定有效的干预措施来降低痴呆症的风险。作者利用大型纵向观察研究的数据进行了一项荟萃分析,以研究孤独感与痴呆症之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving refugee mental health through resilience and research A health-equity framework for tailoring digital non-pharmacological interventions in aging Strengthening autonomy in mental health care through a relational approach A dual-continuum framework to evaluate climate change impacts on mental health New insights from gene expression patterns on the neurobiological basis of risky behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1