Unveiling the Context for Implementing Evidence‐Based Practice in Spanish Nursing

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1111/jan.16604
Juan Carlos Fernández‐Domínguez, Albert Sesé‐Abad, Joan Ernest De Pedro‐Gómez, Jose‐Miguel Morales‐Asencio, Rafael Jiménez‐López
{"title":"Unveiling the Context for Implementing Evidence‐Based Practice in Spanish Nursing","authors":"Juan Carlos Fernández‐Domínguez, Albert Sesé‐Abad, Joan Ernest De Pedro‐Gómez, Jose‐Miguel Morales‐Asencio, Rafael Jiménez‐López","doi":"10.1111/jan.16604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimThis study explores contextual factors affecting evidence‐based practice (EBP) adoption among Spanish nurses, examining their interaction with sociodemographic and practice variables to enhance implementation strategies.DesignA national multicenter study employing a cross‐sectional online survey design was conducted with an intentional sample of 934 voluntary Spanish practicing nurses.MethodsParticipants completed the 12‐item Barriers/facilitators dimension of the HS‐EBP instrument, along with sociodemographic, training and practice information relevant to EBP implementation. Psychometric networks have been utilised as a novel analytical approach.ResultsThe HS‐EBP scores confirm validity and reliability for assessing EBP barriers and facilitators among Spanish nurses. Primary barriers include inadequate EBP discussion spaces, lack of guidance, resistance to change, patient apathy, time constraints and support gaps. Key facilitators are higher academic qualifications, EBP training, professional development participation, educational institution employment and student supervision. Focus is needed on rural nurses and those with heavy clinical duties, facing major EBP barriers.ConclusionSpanish nurses encounter organisational barriers to EBP implementation, including insufficient incentives and support. Prioritising hands‐on training, professional development in teaching and research and robust programs can enhance nurses' ability to advance EBP implementation.ImpactThe HS‐EBP questionnaire is reliable in measuring organisational and contextual factors affecting EBP implementation.Implications for the ProfessionSuccessful implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP) in the Spanish healthcare system depends on developing an appropriate organisational culture and securing support from formal leaders. Additionally, fostering an understanding of the importance of patients and their families among Spanish nurses is crucial for promoting EBP adoption.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimThis study explores contextual factors affecting evidence‐based practice (EBP) adoption among Spanish nurses, examining their interaction with sociodemographic and practice variables to enhance implementation strategies.DesignA national multicenter study employing a cross‐sectional online survey design was conducted with an intentional sample of 934 voluntary Spanish practicing nurses.MethodsParticipants completed the 12‐item Barriers/facilitators dimension of the HS‐EBP instrument, along with sociodemographic, training and practice information relevant to EBP implementation. Psychometric networks have been utilised as a novel analytical approach.ResultsThe HS‐EBP scores confirm validity and reliability for assessing EBP barriers and facilitators among Spanish nurses. Primary barriers include inadequate EBP discussion spaces, lack of guidance, resistance to change, patient apathy, time constraints and support gaps. Key facilitators are higher academic qualifications, EBP training, professional development participation, educational institution employment and student supervision. Focus is needed on rural nurses and those with heavy clinical duties, facing major EBP barriers.ConclusionSpanish nurses encounter organisational barriers to EBP implementation, including insufficient incentives and support. Prioritising hands‐on training, professional development in teaching and research and robust programs can enhance nurses' ability to advance EBP implementation.ImpactThe HS‐EBP questionnaire is reliable in measuring organisational and contextual factors affecting EBP implementation.Implications for the ProfessionSuccessful implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP) in the Spanish healthcare system depends on developing an appropriate organisational culture and securing support from formal leaders. Additionally, fostering an understanding of the importance of patients and their families among Spanish nurses is crucial for promoting EBP adoption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示西班牙护理领域实施循证实践的背景
目的本研究探讨了影响西班牙护士采用循证实践(EBP)的背景因素,研究了这些因素与社会人口学和实践变量之间的相互作用,以加强实施策略。方法参与者完成了 12 个项目的 HS-EBP 工具的障碍/促进因素维度,以及与 EBP 实施相关的社会人口学、培训和实践信息。结果HS-EBP得分证实了评估西班牙护士EBP障碍和促进因素的有效性和可靠性。主要障碍包括 EBP 讨论空间不足、缺乏指导、抵制变革、患者冷漠、时间限制和支持差距。主要促进因素包括较高的学历、EBP 培训、专业发展参与、教育机构就业和学生监督。结论西班牙护士在实施 EBP 时会遇到组织障碍,包括激励和支持不足。将实践培训、教学和研究方面的专业发展以及健全的计划放在首位,可以提高护士推进 EBP 实施的能力。影响HS-EBP 问卷在衡量影响 EBP 实施的组织和环境因素方面是可靠的。对行业的启示在西班牙医疗保健系统中成功实施循证实践(EBP)取决于发展适当的组织文化和获得正式领导的支持。此外,培养西班牙护士对患者及其家属重要性的认识对于促进 EBP 的采用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Technostress, Nursing Informatics Competency and Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour on Nursing Work Performance Among Tertiary Hospital Nurses Prognostic Factors Associated With Survival Distribution of Admission to Delayed Rapid Response Team Activation Among Deteriorating Patients: A Retrospective Study. Nurses' Perceptions of Organisational Attractiveness and Related Factors in Health Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review Patients' Ability to Self-Manage Their Surgical Wound to Prevent Wound Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study Relationships Among Growth Mindset, Turnover Tendency, Workplace Adaptability and Essentials of Magnetism of New Nurses: A Moderated Mediation Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1