The Importance of Analytic Integrity and Reporting Guidelines in Reporting Qualitative Research

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1111/jan.16617
Adrianna Watson, Debra Jackson
{"title":"The Importance of Analytic Integrity and Reporting Guidelines in Reporting Qualitative Research","authors":"Adrianna Watson, Debra Jackson","doi":"10.1111/jan.16617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The journey to publication can be arduous, requiring considerable time, effort and resources. Researchers face numerous challenges, right from initially conceptualising a research idea, forming the research team, securing ethical approvals, recruiting participants, collecting data, analysing findings and making recommendations. Ultimately, these efforts culminate in preparing a manuscript that must meet the standards of reputable and rigorous academic journals to share study findings with the broader nursing and health community. Transparent and ethical reporting plays a crucial role not only in ensuring transparency but also in saving time for both authors and reviewers. Well-structured and complete manuscripts help streamline the review process by minimising the need for revisions related to organisation, clarity and missing information, enhancing transparency and hopefully reducing the time in peer review.</p>\n<p>However, it has been noted that many qualitative manuscripts are rejected before peer review due to poor reporting associated with analytical deficiencies (Jackson and Bradbury-Jones <span>2020</span>). In some cases, authors who have claimed to have conducted multistage thematic analyses have only performed basic clustering and coding, producing findings that lack depth and are methodologically compromised due to poor quality analyses (Jackson and Bradbury-Jones <span>2020</span>). Rigorous analysis, combined with transparent reporting, is essential for meaningful interpretation and practical application of research findings, ultimately increasing the impact of qualitative research in addressing complex questions.</p>\n<p>Receiving a desk rejection after investing so much time and effort can be disheartening, especially when the rejection results from analytical deficiency rather than a lack of originality or relevance. Beyond the frustration for researchers, it can feel like a failure to honour the stories and experiences of participants who contributed to the study. Proper and complete analysis of qualitative data is not only an ethical responsibility but also critical for ensuring that research findings can make a valuable contribution to knowledge. Some useful tools can assist researchers in conducting and reporting their research, and using these can help ensure that manuscripts have a higher chance of successfully getting into peer review.</p>\n<p>In this editorial, we will discuss the importance of analytic integrity and the role of reporting guidelines in enhancing manuscript preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The journey to publication can be arduous, requiring considerable time, effort and resources. Researchers face numerous challenges, right from initially conceptualising a research idea, forming the research team, securing ethical approvals, recruiting participants, collecting data, analysing findings and making recommendations. Ultimately, these efforts culminate in preparing a manuscript that must meet the standards of reputable and rigorous academic journals to share study findings with the broader nursing and health community. Transparent and ethical reporting plays a crucial role not only in ensuring transparency but also in saving time for both authors and reviewers. Well-structured and complete manuscripts help streamline the review process by minimising the need for revisions related to organisation, clarity and missing information, enhancing transparency and hopefully reducing the time in peer review.

However, it has been noted that many qualitative manuscripts are rejected before peer review due to poor reporting associated with analytical deficiencies (Jackson and Bradbury-Jones 2020). In some cases, authors who have claimed to have conducted multistage thematic analyses have only performed basic clustering and coding, producing findings that lack depth and are methodologically compromised due to poor quality analyses (Jackson and Bradbury-Jones 2020). Rigorous analysis, combined with transparent reporting, is essential for meaningful interpretation and practical application of research findings, ultimately increasing the impact of qualitative research in addressing complex questions.

Receiving a desk rejection after investing so much time and effort can be disheartening, especially when the rejection results from analytical deficiency rather than a lack of originality or relevance. Beyond the frustration for researchers, it can feel like a failure to honour the stories and experiences of participants who contributed to the study. Proper and complete analysis of qualitative data is not only an ethical responsibility but also critical for ensuring that research findings can make a valuable contribution to knowledge. Some useful tools can assist researchers in conducting and reporting their research, and using these can help ensure that manuscripts have a higher chance of successfully getting into peer review.

In this editorial, we will discuss the importance of analytic integrity and the role of reporting guidelines in enhancing manuscript preparation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定性研究报告中分析完整性和报告准则的重要性
发表论文的过程可能非常艰辛,需要花费大量的时间、精力和资源。从最初构思研究想法、组建研究团队、获得伦理批准、招募参与者、收集数据、分析研究结果到提出建议,研究人员面临着众多挑战。最终,这些工作都要以撰写手稿为终极目标,而手稿必须符合声誉卓著的严格学术期刊的标准,以便与更广泛的护理和健康界分享研究结果。透明和合乎道德的报告不仅在确保透明度方面起着至关重要的作用,而且还能为作者和审稿人节省时间。结构严谨、内容完整的稿件有助于简化审稿流程,最大限度地减少因组织、清晰度和信息缺失而产生的修改需求,提高透明度,并有望缩短同行评议的时间。然而,人们注意到,许多定性稿件在同行评议前就被拒稿,原因是与分析缺陷相关的报告不完善(Jackson 和 Bradbury-Jones 2020)。在某些情况下,声称进行了多阶段主题分析的作者只进行了基本的聚类和编码,得出的结论缺乏深度,并且由于分析质量不高而在方法论上受到损害(Jackson 和 Bradbury-Jones 2020)。严谨的分析与透明的报告相结合,对研究结果的有意义解释和实际应用至关重要,最终可提高定性研究在解决复杂问题方面的影响力。除了让研究人员感到沮丧之外,还可能让人觉得没有尊重为研究做出贡献的参与者的故事和经历。对定性数据进行适当而完整的分析不仅是一种道德责任,而且对于确保研究成果能够为知识做出有价值的贡献也至关重要。在这篇社论中,我们将讨论分析完整性的重要性以及报告指南在加强稿件准备方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Technostress, Nursing Informatics Competency and Knowledge-Sharing Behaviour on Nursing Work Performance Among Tertiary Hospital Nurses Prognostic Factors Associated With Survival Distribution of Admission to Delayed Rapid Response Team Activation Among Deteriorating Patients: A Retrospective Study. Nurses' Perceptions of Organisational Attractiveness and Related Factors in Health Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review Patients' Ability to Self-Manage Their Surgical Wound to Prevent Wound Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study Relationships Among Growth Mindset, Turnover Tendency, Workplace Adaptability and Essentials of Magnetism of New Nurses: A Moderated Mediation Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1