Identifying future research priorities in the field of interpersonal violence (IV) towards athletes in sport: a Delphi study

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES British Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108763
Sylvie Parent, Stephanie Radziszewski, Osazemen Aghedo, Isabelle Daignault, Emma Kavanagh, Melanie Lang, Margo Mountjoy, Aurélie Pankowiak, Julia Topart, Mary Woessner, Tine Vertommen
{"title":"Identifying future research priorities in the field of interpersonal violence (IV) towards athletes in sport: a Delphi study","authors":"Sylvie Parent, Stephanie Radziszewski, Osazemen Aghedo, Isabelle Daignault, Emma Kavanagh, Melanie Lang, Margo Mountjoy, Aurélie Pankowiak, Julia Topart, Mary Woessner, Tine Vertommen","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Our aim was to define the priorities for future research in safeguarding athletes from interpersonal violence (IV) in sport through a Delphi consensus study of researchers in the field. Methods An internet-based three-round Delphi method was used as a multistage facilitation technique to arrive at a group consensus (set at ≥75% agreement). A targeted literature search was conducted to develop a list of potential research priorities that were presented as short statements in the first round. Results A total of 52 participants (researchers in IV in sport) took part in the first round, 52 completed the second round and 44 completed the third round. Respectively, 47 items, 83 items and 60 items were included in each round. The participants achieved consensus on 11 statements in the first round, seven in the second round and 31 in the third round, for a total of 49 consensus research priorities. The first four priorities that reached consensus (78.8–80.8% agreement) directly following the first Delphi round were scored with high importance (between 6.2 and 6.3 on a scale of 7). Those four priorities included: (1) documenting the experiences of children athletes and minors, (2) studying the disclosure or reporting of violence, (3) developing, evaluating and advising on interventions targeting education and training and (4) documenting the experiences of violence of para athletes. Conclusion This study defines research priorities for IV in sport that may elucidate further gaps in current policies and practices. Data are available upon reasonable request. De-identified participant data could be made available by contacting the corresponding author (Sylvie Parent) at sylvie.parent@fse.ulaval.ca.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Our aim was to define the priorities for future research in safeguarding athletes from interpersonal violence (IV) in sport through a Delphi consensus study of researchers in the field. Methods An internet-based three-round Delphi method was used as a multistage facilitation technique to arrive at a group consensus (set at ≥75% agreement). A targeted literature search was conducted to develop a list of potential research priorities that were presented as short statements in the first round. Results A total of 52 participants (researchers in IV in sport) took part in the first round, 52 completed the second round and 44 completed the third round. Respectively, 47 items, 83 items and 60 items were included in each round. The participants achieved consensus on 11 statements in the first round, seven in the second round and 31 in the third round, for a total of 49 consensus research priorities. The first four priorities that reached consensus (78.8–80.8% agreement) directly following the first Delphi round were scored with high importance (between 6.2 and 6.3 on a scale of 7). Those four priorities included: (1) documenting the experiences of children athletes and minors, (2) studying the disclosure or reporting of violence, (3) developing, evaluating and advising on interventions targeting education and training and (4) documenting the experiences of violence of para athletes. Conclusion This study defines research priorities for IV in sport that may elucidate further gaps in current policies and practices. Data are available upon reasonable request. De-identified participant data could be made available by contacting the corresponding author (Sylvie Parent) at sylvie.parent@fse.ulaval.ca.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定体育运动中针对运动员的人际暴力(IV)领域今后的研究重点:德尔菲研究
目的 我们的目的是通过对该领域研究人员进行德尔菲共识研究,确定今后在保护运动员免受体育人际暴力(IV)方面的研究重点。方法 采用基于互联网的三轮德尔菲法作为多阶段促进技术,以达成小组共识(一致率≥75%)。通过有针对性的文献检索,制定了一份潜在研究重点清单,并在第一轮中以简短陈述的形式提出。结果 共有 52 名参与者(体育 IV 研究人员)参加了第一轮,52 人完成了第二轮,44 人完成了第三轮。每轮分别包括 47 个项目、83 个项目和 60 个项目。参与者在第一轮中就 11 项陈述达成了共识,在第二轮中就 7 项陈述达成了共识,在第三轮中就 31 项陈述达成了共识,总共就 49 个研究重点达成了共识。第一轮德尔菲讨论后直接达成共识(78.8%-80.8% 的一致意见)的前四个优先事项的重要程度较高(7 分制,6.2-6.3 分之间)。这四个优先事项包括(1) 记录儿童运动员和未成年人的经历,(2) 研究暴力的披露或报告,(3) 制定、评估以教育和培训为目标的干预措施并提出建议,(4) 记录准运动员的暴力经历。结论 本研究确定了体育运动中暴力行为的研究重点,可进一步阐明现行政策和实践中的差距。如提出合理要求,可提供数据。如需提供去身份化的参与者数据,请联系通讯作者(Sylvie Parent),电子邮件:sylvie.parent@fse.ulaval.ca。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
期刊最新文献
Refining the recipe or spoiling the broth? Reframing perceptions of programme adaptation in sports injury prevention Elevating the games: the future of the Olympics and Paralympics at higher altitudes Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with dementia risk across different levels of genetic predisposition: a large community-based longitudinal study Physical activity and life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1