Post Hoc Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Analysis of Older Person/Student Nurse Intergenerational Café Implementation

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1111/jan.16613
Dympna Tuohy, Irene Cassidy, Margaret Graham, Jill Murphy, Jacinta Shanahan, Teresa Tuohy, Jane McCarthy
{"title":"Post Hoc Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Analysis of Older Person/Student Nurse Intergenerational Café Implementation","authors":"Dympna Tuohy, Irene Cassidy, Margaret Graham, Jill Murphy, Jacinta Shanahan, Teresa Tuohy, Jane McCarthy","doi":"10.1111/jan.16613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo determine the barriers, facilitators and effectiveness of using an intergenerational café to enable intergenerational learning.DesignImplementation science using the ‘Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research’ framework.MethodsEthical approval for this research was granted by the University of Limerick. Online intergenerational cafés were held with older people and student nurses. Original data were collected through surveys and facilitator reflections. Participants were invited post‐café to participate in the study. Student nurses (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 50) and older people (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 49) participated in an anonymous online survey, and facilitators (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 7) took part in a peer focus group on planning and co‐ordinating the cafés. Post hoc ‘CFIR’ analysis comprised secondary data analysis through mapping descriptive statistics and thematically analysed data to codebooks derived from CFIR domains and constructs.ResultsBarriers and facilitators to café implementation were identified. Organisational factors are important for effective implementation. More students felt that the purpose, topics and running of the café were clear and organised. In contrast, more older people wanted additional time in the discussion groups. Technical difficulties (e.g., computer, logging on) were identified by some as a barrier to participation. Overall, having a clear purpose and topics along with an online approach facilitated implementation. All participants supported the café innovation as a way of increasing intergenerational learning. Facilitators worked effectively as a team to ensure the smooth running of the cafés. The analysis helped determine the effectiveness of the intervention.ConclusionThese cafés facilitated mutual learning and understanding and were well received by participants.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareIntergenerational cafés can support intergenerational learning.ImpactIntergenerational cafés facilitated intergenerational learning.Reporting MethodSRQR/EQUATOR.Patient or Public ContributionThere was no patient/public contribution.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo determine the barriers, facilitators and effectiveness of using an intergenerational café to enable intergenerational learning.DesignImplementation science using the ‘Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research’ framework.MethodsEthical approval for this research was granted by the University of Limerick. Online intergenerational cafés were held with older people and student nurses. Original data were collected through surveys and facilitator reflections. Participants were invited post‐café to participate in the study. Student nurses (n = 50) and older people (n = 49) participated in an anonymous online survey, and facilitators (n = 7) took part in a peer focus group on planning and co‐ordinating the cafés. Post hoc ‘CFIR’ analysis comprised secondary data analysis through mapping descriptive statistics and thematically analysed data to codebooks derived from CFIR domains and constructs.ResultsBarriers and facilitators to café implementation were identified. Organisational factors are important for effective implementation. More students felt that the purpose, topics and running of the café were clear and organised. In contrast, more older people wanted additional time in the discussion groups. Technical difficulties (e.g., computer, logging on) were identified by some as a barrier to participation. Overall, having a clear purpose and topics along with an online approach facilitated implementation. All participants supported the café innovation as a way of increasing intergenerational learning. Facilitators worked effectively as a team to ensure the smooth running of the cafés. The analysis helped determine the effectiveness of the intervention.ConclusionThese cafés facilitated mutual learning and understanding and were well received by participants.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareIntergenerational cafés can support intergenerational learning.ImpactIntergenerational cafés facilitated intergenerational learning.Reporting MethodSRQR/EQUATOR.Patient or Public ContributionThere was no patient/public contribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对老年人/学生护士代际咖啡馆实施情况的事后分析
设计采用 "实施研究综合框架 "框架进行实施科学研究。方法利默里克大学对本研究进行了伦理审批。与老年人和护士学生一起举办了在线代际咖啡馆。原始数据通过调查和主持人的反思收集。咖啡馆后邀请参与者参与研究。学生护士(n = 50)和老年人(n = 49)参加了匿名在线调查,主持人(n = 7)参加了关于规划和协调咖啡馆的同行焦点小组。事后 "CFIR "分析包括通过将描述性统计和主题分析数据映射到从 CFIR 领域和结构中得出的编码本进行的二次数据分析。组织因素对有效实施很重要。更多的学生认为,咖啡馆的目的、主题和运作是明确和有组织的。相比之下,更多的老年人希望在讨论小组中增加时间。一些人认为技术上的困难(如电脑、登录)是参与的障碍。总之,有明确的目的和主题以及在线方法有利于实施。所有参与者都支持将咖啡馆创新作为加强代际学习的一种方式。主持人作为一个团队有效地开展工作,确保了咖啡馆的顺利运行。对专业和/或患者护理的启示代际咖啡馆可以支持代际学习。影响代际咖啡馆促进了代际学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Nurses' Perceptions of Organisational Attractiveness and Related Factors in Health Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review Patients' Ability to Self-Manage Their Surgical Wound to Prevent Wound Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study Relationships Among Growth Mindset, Turnover Tendency, Workplace Adaptability and Essentials of Magnetism of New Nurses: A Moderated Mediation Model Health-Related Quality of Life in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Integrative Review Implementing the MIRROR-TCM Randomised Control Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1