Toward medical test recommendation from optimal attribute selection perspectives: a backward reasoning approach

IF 5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Complex & Intelligent Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s40747-024-01629-3
Nengjun Zhu, Jieyun Huang, Jian Cao, Liang Hu, Siji Zhu
{"title":"Toward medical test recommendation from optimal attribute selection perspectives: a backward reasoning approach","authors":"Nengjun Zhu, Jieyun Huang, Jian Cao, Liang Hu, Siji Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s40747-024-01629-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medical tests are crucial for treatment decision making. However, over-testing can often occur in any medical speciality or level of expertise. Since over-testing usually results in a financial burden for patients and is also a waste of medical resources, this naturally leads to the question: which medical test items (MTIs) are necessary and should be prioritized for the target patients? It is a nontrivial task to identify the right MTIs due to the diversified health status of patients and the complicated prerequisites of therapies. To this end, in this paper, we propose a data-driven approach to evaluate the priority which should be given to MTIs by modeling the relationships between MTIs and therapies. Specifically, we first develop a dual hierarchical topic model (DHTM), which views the adopted hierarchical therapies as labeled topics and the MTI reports, i.e., the set of hierarchical attribute-value pairs (AVPs), as documents. Then, with the therapy-AVP distribution and the partial MTI reports of the target patient, we can scope the candidate therapies, which are further utilized to evaluate the accumulated gain of MTIs to be tested. Moreover, the next MTI recommendation is conducted based on the gains. Finally, extensive experiments on real-world medical data validate the effectiveness of our approach, and some interesting observations are also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":10524,"journal":{"name":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01629-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical tests are crucial for treatment decision making. However, over-testing can often occur in any medical speciality or level of expertise. Since over-testing usually results in a financial burden for patients and is also a waste of medical resources, this naturally leads to the question: which medical test items (MTIs) are necessary and should be prioritized for the target patients? It is a nontrivial task to identify the right MTIs due to the diversified health status of patients and the complicated prerequisites of therapies. To this end, in this paper, we propose a data-driven approach to evaluate the priority which should be given to MTIs by modeling the relationships between MTIs and therapies. Specifically, we first develop a dual hierarchical topic model (DHTM), which views the adopted hierarchical therapies as labeled topics and the MTI reports, i.e., the set of hierarchical attribute-value pairs (AVPs), as documents. Then, with the therapy-AVP distribution and the partial MTI reports of the target patient, we can scope the candidate therapies, which are further utilized to evaluate the accumulated gain of MTIs to be tested. Moreover, the next MTI recommendation is conducted based on the gains. Finally, extensive experiments on real-world medical data validate the effectiveness of our approach, and some interesting observations are also provided.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从最优属性选择角度看医学检验推荐:一种后向推理方法
医学检验对治疗决策至关重要。然而,任何医学专业或专业水平都可能出现过度检查的情况。由于过度检查通常会给患者造成经济负担,同时也是对医疗资源的浪费,这就自然而然地引出了一个问题:对于目标患者而言,哪些医学检查项目(MTI)是必要的,并应优先考虑?由于患者的健康状况各不相同,治疗的前提条件也很复杂,因此要确定合适的 MTI 并不是一件容易的事。为此,我们在本文中提出了一种数据驱动方法,通过模拟 MTI 与疗法之间的关系来评估 MTI 的优先级。具体来说,我们首先开发了双分层主题模型(DHTM),该模型将采用的分层疗法视为标注主题,将 MTI 报告(即分层属性-值对(AVP)集)视为文档。然后,根据疗法-AVP 分布和目标患者的部分 MTI 报告,我们可以确定候选疗法的范围,并进一步利用这些候选疗法来评估待测 MTI 的累积增益。此外,我们还会根据收益情况推荐下一个 MTI。最后,在真实世界医疗数据上进行的大量实验验证了我们方法的有效性,同时也提供了一些有趣的观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complex & Intelligent Systems
Complex & Intelligent Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
297
期刊介绍: Complex & Intelligent Systems aims to provide a forum for presenting and discussing novel approaches, tools and techniques meant for attaining a cross-fertilization between the broad fields of complex systems, computational simulation, and intelligent analytics and visualization. The transdisciplinary research that the journal focuses on will expand the boundaries of our understanding by investigating the principles and processes that underlie many of the most profound problems facing society today.
期刊最新文献
Large-scale multiobjective competitive swarm optimizer algorithm based on regional multidirectional search Towards fairness-aware multi-objective optimization Low-frequency spectral graph convolution networks with one-hop connections information for personalized tag recommendation A decentralized feedback-based consensus model considering the consistency maintenance and readability of probabilistic linguistic preference relations for large-scale group decision-making A dynamic preference recommendation model based on spatiotemporal knowledge graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1