Analysis of Vitamin D3 in Meat-Based Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Products: A Comparative Study of Extraction Methods (SPE and DLLME) Using LC–MS/MS

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Analytical Methods Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s12161-024-02680-z
Harshitha Annappa, Anand Tamatam, Ilaiyaraja Nallamuthu, Mahadeva Naika, Lakshmana JH, Dhananjay Kumar
{"title":"Analysis of Vitamin D3 in Meat-Based Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Products: A Comparative Study of Extraction Methods (SPE and DLLME) Using LC–MS/MS","authors":"Harshitha Annappa,&nbsp;Anand Tamatam,&nbsp;Ilaiyaraja Nallamuthu,&nbsp;Mahadeva Naika,&nbsp;Lakshmana JH,&nbsp;Dhananjay Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12161-024-02680-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vitamin D is a crucial nutrient, and its accurate quantification in food matrices, such as meat and egg, is vital for nutritional and health assessments. In the present study, two extraction methods, i.e., solid phase extraction (SPE) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), after sample hydrolysis by saponification, were compared for better vitamin D extraction from the samples. The extracted analyte was analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) by electron spray ionization method. The efficiency of the SPE method was tested with petroleum ether, chloroform, n-heptane, and dichloromethane solvents through C-18 Oasis cartridge, while the DLLME method was evaluated with varying combinations of extraction solvents (toluene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, and dichloromethane) and dispersive solvents (acetone, acetonitrile, and ethanol). The results showed that the recovery of the vitamin in the SPE method ranged between 8.6 and 17.2%, with the maximum recovery achieved using petroleum ether. On the other hand, the DLLME method yielded a broader range of recovery (2.4–118.9%) for the different combinations of dispersive and extraction solvents. As the maximum recovery was obtained for the combination of toluene and acetone in DLLME method, this was selected for further studies to extract vitamin D3 from boiled egg, cooked fish, and ready-to-eat food products (chicken biryani, chicken pulav, chicken soup, chicken curry, and chicken kurma). The vitamin D3 content in the food products varied in the range of 11.6–136.4 µg/kg, where boiled egg (11.6 ± 8.7 µg/kg) and fish (136.4 ± 8.8 µg/kg) had minimum and maximum quantities, respectively.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"17 12","pages":"1702 - 1713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02680-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vitamin D is a crucial nutrient, and its accurate quantification in food matrices, such as meat and egg, is vital for nutritional and health assessments. In the present study, two extraction methods, i.e., solid phase extraction (SPE) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), after sample hydrolysis by saponification, were compared for better vitamin D extraction from the samples. The extracted analyte was analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) by electron spray ionization method. The efficiency of the SPE method was tested with petroleum ether, chloroform, n-heptane, and dichloromethane solvents through C-18 Oasis cartridge, while the DLLME method was evaluated with varying combinations of extraction solvents (toluene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, and dichloromethane) and dispersive solvents (acetone, acetonitrile, and ethanol). The results showed that the recovery of the vitamin in the SPE method ranged between 8.6 and 17.2%, with the maximum recovery achieved using petroleum ether. On the other hand, the DLLME method yielded a broader range of recovery (2.4–118.9%) for the different combinations of dispersive and extraction solvents. As the maximum recovery was obtained for the combination of toluene and acetone in DLLME method, this was selected for further studies to extract vitamin D3 from boiled egg, cooked fish, and ready-to-eat food products (chicken biryani, chicken pulav, chicken soup, chicken curry, and chicken kurma). The vitamin D3 content in the food products varied in the range of 11.6–136.4 µg/kg, where boiled egg (11.6 ± 8.7 µg/kg) and fish (136.4 ± 8.8 µg/kg) had minimum and maximum quantities, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉类即食(RTE)产品中维生素 D3 的分析:使用 LC-MS/MS 的提取方法(SPE 和 DLLME)比较研究
维生素 D 是一种重要的营养素,在肉类和蛋类等食品基质中对其进行准确定量对于营养和健康评估至关重要。本研究比较了固相萃取(SPE)和分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)两种萃取方法,前者是在样品经皂化水解后进行的,后者则是为了更好地从样品中提取维生素 D。提取的分析物采用电子喷雾离子化法进行液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)分析。使用石油醚、氯仿、正庚烷和二氯甲烷溶剂通过 C-18 Oasis 滤芯测试了 SPE 方法的效率,而使用不同的萃取溶剂组合(甲苯、四氯化碳、氯仿和二氯甲烷)和分散溶剂(丙酮、乙腈和乙醇)评估了 DLLME 方法。结果表明,SPE 法的维生素回收率在 8.6% 到 17.2% 之间,其中石油醚的回收率最高。另一方面,DLLME 方法在不同的分散溶剂和萃取溶剂组合下的回收率范围更广(2.4%-118.9%)。由于 DLLME 法中甲苯和丙酮的组合回收率最高,因此被选作进一步研究的对象,用于从煮鸡蛋、熟鱼和即食食品(鸡肉饭、鸡肉卷、鸡汤、咖喱鸡肉和咖喱鸡肉)中提取维生素 D3。食品中的维生素 D3 含量变化范围为 11.6-136.4 微克/千克,其中煮鸡蛋(11.6 ± 8.7 微克/千克)和鱼(136.4 ± 8.8 微克/千克)的含量分别最低和最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
期刊最新文献
A Straightforward Method for Disaccharide Characterization from Transverse Relaxometry Using Low-Field Time-Domain Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Phytochemical Factor Analysis of Some Extra Virgin Olive Oils (Olivae oleum) and the Effects of Storage Under Different Conditions—Simulating General Consumer Behavior Sensory Evaluation and Volatile Organic Compounds in Dried Mango Produced from Different Varieties Determination of Adulteration in Evening Primrose Oil Capsules by 1H NMR Analysis and Chemometric Techniques Advanced Quantification of Trans Fatty Acids in Biscuits Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FT-IR-ATR)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1