A group consensus reaching model balancing individual satisfaction and group fairness for distributed linguistic preference relations

IF 3.4 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Applied Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s10489-024-05732-3
Yingying Liang, Tianyu Zhang, Yan Tu, Qian Zhao
{"title":"A group consensus reaching model balancing individual satisfaction and group fairness for distributed linguistic preference relations","authors":"Yingying Liang,&nbsp;Tianyu Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Tu,&nbsp;Qian Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s10489-024-05732-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In real-world complex group decision-making problems, preference inconsistency and opinion conflict are common and crucial challenges that need to be tackled. To promote consensus reaching, a novel group consensus reaching model is constructed considering individual satisfaction and group fairness. This study focuses on managing the group consensus reaching process based on flexible and adaptable information, modelled as distributed linguistic preference relations (DLPRs). First, a building process for DLPRs is discussed by integrating cumulative distribution functions converted from single linguistic term sets, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, and comparative linguistic expressions. Furthermore, a two-stage consistency improvement method is proposed, which makes a trade-off between the frequency and magnitude of adjustments. Finally, we establish an improved group consensus model to balance individual satisfaction and group fairness, where individual satisfaction is measured by the deviation between the original and revised preferences and group fairness is measured by the deviation between individual satisfactions. The emergency response plan selection is conducted to show the validity and advantages of the proposed approach.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><img></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":8041,"journal":{"name":"Applied Intelligence","volume":"54 24","pages":"12697 - 12724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-024-05732-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In real-world complex group decision-making problems, preference inconsistency and opinion conflict are common and crucial challenges that need to be tackled. To promote consensus reaching, a novel group consensus reaching model is constructed considering individual satisfaction and group fairness. This study focuses on managing the group consensus reaching process based on flexible and adaptable information, modelled as distributed linguistic preference relations (DLPRs). First, a building process for DLPRs is discussed by integrating cumulative distribution functions converted from single linguistic term sets, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, and comparative linguistic expressions. Furthermore, a two-stage consistency improvement method is proposed, which makes a trade-off between the frequency and magnitude of adjustments. Finally, we establish an improved group consensus model to balance individual satisfaction and group fairness, where individual satisfaction is measured by the deviation between the original and revised preferences and group fairness is measured by the deviation between individual satisfactions. The emergency response plan selection is conducted to show the validity and advantages of the proposed approach.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兼顾分布式语言偏好关系的个人满意度和群体公平性的群体共识达成模型
在现实世界的复杂群体决策问题中,偏好不一致和意见冲突是亟待解决的常见难题。为了促进达成共识,我们构建了一个考虑个人满意度和群体公平性的新型群体共识达成模型。本研究的重点是基于灵活、可调整的信息,以分布式语言偏好关系(DLPRs)为模型,管理群体共识达成过程。首先,通过整合从单一语言术语集、犹豫模糊语言术语集和比较语言表达转换而来的累积分布函数,讨论了 DLPRs 的构建过程。此外,还提出了一种两阶段一致性改进方法,在调整频率和调整幅度之间进行权衡。最后,我们建立了一个改进的群体共识模型,以平衡个人满意度和群体公平性,其中个人满意度由原始偏好和修正偏好之间的偏差来衡量,群体公平性由个人满意度之间的偏差来衡量。通过应急响应计划的选择,展示了所提方法的有效性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Intelligence
Applied Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.80%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: With a focus on research in artificial intelligence and neural networks, this journal addresses issues involving solutions of real-life manufacturing, defense, management, government and industrial problems which are too complex to be solved through conventional approaches and require the simulation of intelligent thought processes, heuristics, applications of knowledge, and distributed and parallel processing. The integration of these multiple approaches in solving complex problems is of particular importance. The journal presents new and original research and technological developments, addressing real and complex issues applicable to difficult problems. It provides a medium for exchanging scientific research and technological achievements accomplished by the international community.
期刊最新文献
ZPDSN: spatio-temporal meteorological forecasting with topological data analysis DTR4Rec: direct transition relationship for sequential recommendation Unsupervised anomaly detection and imputation in noisy time series data for enhancing load forecasting A prototype evolution network for relation extraction Highway spillage detection using an improved STPM anomaly detection network from a surveillance perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1