Total, dietary, and supplemental calcium intake and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality among U.S. adults: a prospective cohort study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Archives of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01457-5
Ran Chen, Ying Tang, Shunzheng Fang, Kai Gong, Dong Liu, Yu Xie, Guo Liu, Yu Tian, Lianyang Zhang, Yang Li, Siru Zhou
{"title":"Total, dietary, and supplemental calcium intake and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality among U.S. adults: a prospective cohort study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey","authors":"Ran Chen,&nbsp;Ying Tang,&nbsp;Shunzheng Fang,&nbsp;Kai Gong,&nbsp;Dong Liu,&nbsp;Yu Xie,&nbsp;Guo Liu,&nbsp;Yu Tian,&nbsp;Lianyang Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Li,&nbsp;Siru Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01457-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>Calcium intake is widely recommended, but its association with mortality remains unclear. This study indicated higher levels of calcium intake were associated with lower mortality in American adults. However, a nonlinear association between calcium intake and mortality suggested that excessive calcium intake beyond a certain threshold may increase mortality risk.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The study aimed to investigate the association of total, dietary, or supplemental calcium intake with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in American adults.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective cohort study used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005 to 2018. Participants were categorized into tertiles based on calcium intake. Risks of all-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality and the dose–response relationship were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazard regression and restricted cubic splines, with adjustments for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and dietary data.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 6172 participants were included (median age: 61 years), and 869 had died (CVD:217, cancer:224) during a median follow-up of 81 months. After adjusting for confounders, higher total calcium(≥ 1660mg/d) [HR, 95%CI: 0.867 (0.865–0.869)], dietary calcium(≥ 1075mg/d) [HR, 95%CI: 0.711 (0.709–0.713)], and supplemental calcium (≥ 600mg/d) [HR, 95%CI: 0.786 (0.784–0.787)] intake groups were associated with lower all-cause mortality risk compared to the lowest intake group. Similar beneficial associations were found for cardiovascular, cancer mortality, and across subgroups of various ages, genders, races and body mass indexes. In the dose–response analysis, a 'J-shaped' nonlinear relationship was observed between calcium intake and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Higher levels of total, dietary, or supplemental calcium were associated with lower all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality. However, a nonlinear association between calcium intake and mortality suggested that excessive calcium intake beyond a certain threshold may increase mortality risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01457-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

Calcium intake is widely recommended, but its association with mortality remains unclear. This study indicated higher levels of calcium intake were associated with lower mortality in American adults. However, a nonlinear association between calcium intake and mortality suggested that excessive calcium intake beyond a certain threshold may increase mortality risk.

Purpose

The study aimed to investigate the association of total, dietary, or supplemental calcium intake with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in American adults.

Methods

This prospective cohort study used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005 to 2018. Participants were categorized into tertiles based on calcium intake. Risks of all-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality and the dose–response relationship were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazard regression and restricted cubic splines, with adjustments for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and dietary data.

Results

In total, 6172 participants were included (median age: 61 years), and 869 had died (CVD:217, cancer:224) during a median follow-up of 81 months. After adjusting for confounders, higher total calcium(≥ 1660mg/d) [HR, 95%CI: 0.867 (0.865–0.869)], dietary calcium(≥ 1075mg/d) [HR, 95%CI: 0.711 (0.709–0.713)], and supplemental calcium (≥ 600mg/d) [HR, 95%CI: 0.786 (0.784–0.787)] intake groups were associated with lower all-cause mortality risk compared to the lowest intake group. Similar beneficial associations were found for cardiovascular, cancer mortality, and across subgroups of various ages, genders, races and body mass indexes. In the dose–response analysis, a 'J-shaped' nonlinear relationship was observed between calcium intake and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality.

Conclusions

Higher levels of total, dietary, or supplemental calcium were associated with lower all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality. However, a nonlinear association between calcium intake and mortality suggested that excessive calcium intake beyond a certain threshold may increase mortality risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人的总钙、膳食钙和补充钙摄入量与全因、心血管和癌症死亡风险:一项来自全国健康与营养调查的前瞻性队列研究
摘要钙摄入量被广泛推荐,但其与死亡率的关系仍不清楚。这项研究表明,钙摄入量越高,美国成年人的死亡率越低。然而,钙摄入量与死亡率之间的非线性关系表明,超过一定阈值的过量钙摄入量可能会增加死亡风险。这项研究旨在调查美国成年人总钙、膳食钙或补充钙摄入量与全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和癌症死亡率之间的关系。根据钙摄入量将参与者分为三等分。使用加权 Cox 比例危险回归和限制性三次样条估计全因、癌症或心血管死亡风险和剂量-反应关系,并对人口统计学特征、合并症、实验室参数和饮食数据进行调整。结果共纳入 6172 名参与者(中位年龄:61 岁),在中位随访 81 个月期间,有 869 人死亡(心血管疾病:217 人,癌症:224 人)。调整混杂因素后,总钙(≥ 1660 毫克/天)[HR,95%CI:0.867 (0.865-0.869)]、膳食钙(≥ 1075 毫克/天)[HR,95%CI:0.711 (0.709-0.713)]和补充钙(≥ 600 毫克/天)[HR,95%CI:0.786 (0.784-0.787)]摄入量较高的组别与摄入量最低的组别相比,全因死亡风险较低。在心血管和癌症死亡率方面,以及在不同年龄、性别、种族和体重指数的亚组中,也发现了类似的有益关联。在剂量反应分析中,钙摄入量与全因、心血管和癌症死亡风险之间呈 "J "形非线性关系。然而,钙摄入量与死亡率之间的非线性关系表明,钙摄入量超过一定阈值可能会增加死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
期刊最新文献
Hip fractures in older patients: analysing the activity of an orthopaedic department to design an optimized pathway of fracture care Ukrainian guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis Assessment of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures with T1- and T2-weighted MRI scans The management of osteoporosis in hospitalized patients with fragility hip fractures in western Saudi Arabia: a real-world tertiary center experience The association between the number of chronic conditions and treatment of patients who are at high risk for future fracture in the Ontario Fracture Screening and Prevention Program (FSPP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1