Is hip adductor or abductor strength in healthy athletes associated with future groin pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES British Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2024-108836
Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Germán Vicente-Rodríguez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas
{"title":"Is hip adductor or abductor strength in healthy athletes associated with future groin pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Marcos Quintana-Cepedal, Germán Vicente-Rodríguez, Irene Crespo, Hugo Olmedillas","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2024-108836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To systematically review the association between hip adduction and abduction strength, and adduction-to-abduction strength ratio in healthy athletes with the occurrence of future groin pain and time-loss groin injuries. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, Embase, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria Studies included had to (1) measure hip adductor or abductor strength in healthy athletes, (2) conduct a follow-up period to assess the occurrence of groin pain, (3) present strength data separately for participants who remained uninjured and those who suffered an injury and (4) use a prospective design. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The certainty in the evidence appraised was measured using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach. Results Thirteen prospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall study risk of bias was rated as low. Players who remained uninjured had stronger adduction strength compared with players who subsequently suffered groin pain (standardised mean differences with 95% CIs (SMD=−0.5, 95% CI −0.92 to −0.09)) and time-loss groin pain (SMD=−0.68, 95% CI −1.31 to −0.06). Trivial effects were observed for abduction strength (groin pain SMD=0.03, 95% CI −0.11 to 0.17; time-loss SMD=−0.07, 95% CI −0.25 to 0.11) and adduction-to-abduction strength ratio (groin pain SMD=−0.02, 95% CI −0.55 to 0.51; time-loss SMD=−0.11, 95% CI −1.11 to 0.89). Age and diagnostic criteria were not significant moderators of the relationship between adductor strength and groin pain (p=0.72 and p=0.12). Conclusion There is a moderate effect of hip adductor strength on the occurrence of groin pain, while there is no relationship between either abductor strength or the ratio of adductor-to-abductor strength with the occurrence of groin pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024548630. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108836","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the association between hip adduction and abduction strength, and adduction-to-abduction strength ratio in healthy athletes with the occurrence of future groin pain and time-loss groin injuries. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, Embase, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria Studies included had to (1) measure hip adductor or abductor strength in healthy athletes, (2) conduct a follow-up period to assess the occurrence of groin pain, (3) present strength data separately for participants who remained uninjured and those who suffered an injury and (4) use a prospective design. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The certainty in the evidence appraised was measured using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach. Results Thirteen prospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall study risk of bias was rated as low. Players who remained uninjured had stronger adduction strength compared with players who subsequently suffered groin pain (standardised mean differences with 95% CIs (SMD=−0.5, 95% CI −0.92 to −0.09)) and time-loss groin pain (SMD=−0.68, 95% CI −1.31 to −0.06). Trivial effects were observed for abduction strength (groin pain SMD=0.03, 95% CI −0.11 to 0.17; time-loss SMD=−0.07, 95% CI −0.25 to 0.11) and adduction-to-abduction strength ratio (groin pain SMD=−0.02, 95% CI −0.55 to 0.51; time-loss SMD=−0.11, 95% CI −1.11 to 0.89). Age and diagnostic criteria were not significant moderators of the relationship between adductor strength and groin pain (p=0.72 and p=0.12). Conclusion There is a moderate effect of hip adductor strength on the occurrence of groin pain, while there is no relationship between either abductor strength or the ratio of adductor-to-abductor strength with the occurrence of groin pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024548630. Data are available upon reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康运动员的髋关节内收或外展力量与未来腹股沟疼痛有关吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的 系统回顾健康运动员的髋关节内收和外展力量以及内收与外展力量比值与未来腹股沟疼痛的发生和腹股沟损伤时间损失之间的关系。设计 采用荟萃分析法进行系统回顾。数据来源:PubMed、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、PEDro、Embase 和 Scopus。资格标准 所纳入的研究必须:(1)测量健康运动员的髋关节内收或外展力量;(2)进行随访以评估腹股沟疼痛的发生情况;(3)分别提供未受伤和受伤运动员的力量数据;(4)采用前瞻性设计。偏倚风险根据预后研究质量工具进行评估。所评估证据的确定性采用建议分级评估开发和评价方法进行衡量。结果 13 项前瞻性队列研究符合纳入标准。研究的总体偏倚风险被评为低。与后来腹股沟疼痛的球员相比,未受伤的球员具有更强的外展力量(标准化平均差与 95% CIs (SMD=-0.5, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.09)),而腹股沟疼痛的时间损失(SMD=-0.68, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.06)。外展力量(腹股沟痛SMD=0.03,95% CI -0.11至0.17;时间损失SMD=-0.07,95% CI -0.25至0.11)和内收与外展力量比(腹股沟痛SMD=-0.02,95% CI -0.55至0.51;时间损失SMD=-0.11,95% CI -1.11至0.89)的影响微乎其微。年龄和诊断标准对内收肌力量和腹股沟疼痛之间的关系没有显著调节作用(P=0.72 和 P=0.12)。结论 髋关节内收肌力量对腹股沟疼痛的发生有一定的影响,而外收肌力量或内收肌力量与外收肌力量的比率与腹股沟疼痛的发生没有关系。PROSPERO 注册号为 CRD42024548630。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
期刊最新文献
Refining the recipe or spoiling the broth? Reframing perceptions of programme adaptation in sports injury prevention Elevating the games: the future of the Olympics and Paralympics at higher altitudes Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with dementia risk across different levels of genetic predisposition: a large community-based longitudinal study Physical activity and life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1