Cooperative Game-Based Consensus Adjustment Mechanism With Distribution Linguistic Preference Relations for Group Decision Making

IF 11.9 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3496661
Yanjing Guo;Yiran Wang;Zhongming Wu;Fanyong Meng
{"title":"Cooperative Game-Based Consensus Adjustment Mechanism With Distribution Linguistic Preference Relations for Group Decision Making","authors":"Yanjing Guo;Yiran Wang;Zhongming Wu;Fanyong Meng","doi":"10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3496661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distribution linguistic preference relations (DLPRs) play a crucial role in group decision making due to their ability to capture hesitation and uncertainty in individual judgments. By utilizing multiple linguistic variables with associated distribution proportions, DLPRs offer a flexible way to represent preferences. However, current models that use DLPRs often overlook two crucial factors: the ordinal consistency of preference relations and the fairness of adjustment allocation within the DLPRs-based consensus reaching process. In this article, we propose a cooperative game-based minimum adjustment consensus reaching mechanism that accounts for both ordinal consistency and the hesitant degree in DLPRs. This approach leverages the properties of indices in cooperative game theory to ensures a fair allocation of consistency and consensus adjustments, while maintaining ordinal consistency and controlling the hesitant degree of DLPRs through the construction of appropriate constraints to preserve their quality. In addition, a new algorithm is developed to manage completeness, ordinal and acceptable cardinal consistency, consensus-reaching, and hesitation in scenarios involving incomplete DLPRs. Finally, a case study is provided to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed method. Sensitivity and comparative analyzes with existing models are performed to assess the performance of the approach in terms of quality, fairness, and efficiency.","PeriodicalId":13212,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","volume":"33 3","pages":"919-931"},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10750417/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distribution linguistic preference relations (DLPRs) play a crucial role in group decision making due to their ability to capture hesitation and uncertainty in individual judgments. By utilizing multiple linguistic variables with associated distribution proportions, DLPRs offer a flexible way to represent preferences. However, current models that use DLPRs often overlook two crucial factors: the ordinal consistency of preference relations and the fairness of adjustment allocation within the DLPRs-based consensus reaching process. In this article, we propose a cooperative game-based minimum adjustment consensus reaching mechanism that accounts for both ordinal consistency and the hesitant degree in DLPRs. This approach leverages the properties of indices in cooperative game theory to ensures a fair allocation of consistency and consensus adjustments, while maintaining ordinal consistency and controlling the hesitant degree of DLPRs through the construction of appropriate constraints to preserve their quality. In addition, a new algorithm is developed to manage completeness, ordinal and acceptable cardinal consistency, consensus-reaching, and hesitation in scenarios involving incomplete DLPRs. Finally, a case study is provided to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed method. Sensitivity and comparative analyzes with existing models are performed to assess the performance of the approach in terms of quality, fairness, and efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于分布式语言偏好关系的合作博弈共识调整机制,用于群体决策
分布语言偏好关系能够捕捉个体判断中的犹豫和不确定性,在群体决策中起着至关重要的作用。通过使用具有相关分布比例的多个语言变量,dlpr提供了一种灵活的方式来表示偏好。然而,目前使用DLPRs的模型往往忽略了两个关键因素:在基于DLPRs的共识达成过程中,偏好关系的顺序一致性和调整分配的公平性。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于合作博弈的最小调整共识达成机制,该机制考虑了dlpr中的有序一致性和犹豫度。该方法利用合作博弈论中指标的特性,保证一致性和共识调整的公平分配,同时通过构建适当的约束来保持dlpr的有序一致性和控制其犹豫程度,以保持其质量。此外,还开发了一种新的算法来管理不完全dlpr场景下的完备性、序数和可接受基数一致性、共识达成和犹豫。最后,给出了一个案例来说明所提出方法的实际应用。对现有模型进行敏感性分析和比较分析,以评估该方法在质量、公平性和效率方面的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
13.40%
发文量
517
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems is a scholarly journal that focuses on the theory, design, and application of fuzzy systems. It aims to publish high-quality technical papers that contribute significant technical knowledge and exploratory developments in the field of fuzzy systems. The journal particularly emphasizes engineering systems and scientific applications. In addition to research articles, the Transactions also includes a letters section featuring current information, comments, and rebuttals related to published papers.
期刊最新文献
LLM-Driven Multimodal Knowledge Graph Construction for Industrial Process With Prompt Optimization and Fuzzy RAG Granular-Ball Subspace-Based Fuzzy Neighborhood Anomaly Detector Neighborhood-Aware Fuzzy Graph Convolutional Networks for Improved Information Fusion Intrusion Detection in Industrial Internet of Things Based on Granular-Ball Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Fuzzy Advantage Granular Ball Rough Set for Feature Selection via Deep Reinforcement Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1