[Comparative double-blind evaluation of a new topical antibacterial agent, mupirocin, compared with placebo in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections].

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1988-01-01
M Colin, P Avon
{"title":"[Comparative double-blind evaluation of a new topical antibacterial agent, mupirocin, compared with placebo in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections].","authors":"M Colin,&nbsp;P Avon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ninety-eight patients suffering from skin and soft tissue infections in the Côte d'Ivoire were treated topically with a new antibiotic, mupirocine, or with placebo in a double-blind study. Patients were allocated at random to receive one or other treatment, applying the ointment, supplied in identical tubes and of similar colour base, to the lesions 3 times a day for 5 days. Overall evaluation of clinical response to treatment showed that the results with mupirocine were significantly superior to those with placebo. No unwanted effects of treatment were observed in either treatment group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"5 3","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ninety-eight patients suffering from skin and soft tissue infections in the Côte d'Ivoire were treated topically with a new antibiotic, mupirocine, or with placebo in a double-blind study. Patients were allocated at random to receive one or other treatment, applying the ointment, supplied in identical tubes and of similar colour base, to the lesions 3 times a day for 5 days. Overall evaluation of clinical response to treatment showed that the results with mupirocine were significantly superior to those with placebo. No unwanted effects of treatment were observed in either treatment group.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[一种新的局部抗菌剂莫匹罗星与安慰剂治疗皮肤和软组织感染的比较双盲评价]。
在一项双盲研究中,Côte科特迪瓦的98名皮肤和软组织感染患者接受了一种新的抗生素莫匹罗辛或安慰剂的局部治疗。随机分配患者接受一种或另一种治疗,将药膏涂在相同的管中,颜色基础相似,每天3次,持续5天。对治疗的临床反应的总体评价表明,莫匹罗辛的结果明显优于安慰剂。两组治疗均未见不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1